1 / 13

Hints and Tips for Conducting Qualitative Research

Overview Stages of Qualitative Research 1998-2000 Research 2000-Ongoing Research Next Project; 2008-ongoing. Hints and Tips for Conducting Qualitative Research. Contact Info: Dr. Mary Jo Self, Associate Professor (405) 744-9191 maryjo.self@okstate.edu.

abdul-bolton
Télécharger la présentation

Hints and Tips for Conducting Qualitative Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview Stages of Qualitative Research 1998-2000 Research 2000-Ongoing Research Next Project; 2008-ongoing Hints and Tips for Conducting Qualitative Research Contact Info: Dr. Mary Jo Self, Associate Professor (405) 744-9191 maryjo.self@okstate.edu

  2. Overall epistemology of qualitative research • More than techniques; an approach to research • Phenomena should be viewed as a whole, • Complex phenomena can’t be divided into independent parts, • A natural setting is important • Maintain an openness about what will be observed and collected; • Flexible design; evolving design as the research proceeds.

  3. Overview cont. • Perceptions of the participants are captured to obtain an accurate measure of reality; • Meaning is not what it means to the researcher but what the participants perceive it to be; • Assumptions and conclusions are subject to change as the research proceeds; • Phenomena are perceived as a loosely constructed model, flexibility in prediction; not conducted in a rigid step by step process.

  4. Stage One:Working Design • Subjects (participants) to be studied • Site selection • Length of the study • Possible variables identified

  5. Stage Two:Working Hypotheses • Conceptual framework • Previous research • What is already known about a topic • Foreshadowed problems • Research questions

  6. Stage Three:Data Collection • Interview oral histories • Observation records – field notes • Document collection and review

  7. Stage Four:Data Analysis and Interpretation • Data reduction and coding • Data organization • Checking hypotheses and theories • Description

  8. 1998-2000 Research • Dissertation Study: • “On Retention of Oklahoma Secondary Trade and Industrial Education Teachers: Voices from the Field” • Recipient of NAITTE Graduate Student Research Award for Outstanding Dissertation in 2001

  9. 2000-Ongoing Research • CareerTech Teacher Induction Process • Fifth year of funded project • Renewable each year by consensus of career tech superintendents and Oklahoma Department of Career Tech • 2000- 2001 • Use of surveys for each group • 2001-2002 • Combined surveys and face-to-face interviews • Surveys; 70% of participants responded • 64 interviews • 2002-2003 • Surveys with all participants • 2003-ongoing • Surveys with all participants

  10. Hints • Use of color-coded files for each year • Organization of consent forms, etc. • Audit trail • Field notes – number lines • Schedule meetings as early as possible • References – use of End Notes Plus • Numbered, put in binders • Back up your back ups! • Use of transcriber; “Kay Porter” type individual • Use of colored markers; big sketch pads • Bind large documents; Kinko’s is your friend!

  11. Next Project: • Career Stages of Oklahoma’s career and technology education teachers • Timeline: • July – IRB, Proposal • August– Begin conducting research • August – December – conduct research • January and on – interviews, data coding, data interpretation • Purpose: • Predict retirement rates of different divisions with the Oklahoma career tech system, • Better understand the career stages of teachers, • Possible efforts to mitigate the results of teachers who are disillusioned and burned out.

  12. Next Project: Career Stages of Oklahoma’s career and technology education teachers • Mixed method • Surveys to all teachers currently teaching in Oklahoma • Use of Steffy’s career stages and Fessler and Christensen’s teacher career cycle • Use questionnaire based on their work as well as the following: • Teacher Efficacy in Classroom Management and Discipline Scale (Emmer and Hickman, 1991) • The Quality of Teacher Work Life (Pelsma, Richard, Harrington & Burry, 1989) • Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (Maslach, Jackson, & Schwab, 1996) • Hope Scale (Snyder, Harris, Anderson, Holleran, Irving, Sigmon, Yoshinobu, Gibb, Langelle, & Harney, 1991). • Interview a sample from each category

  13. Conclusion: • Simply put, know what you want to know • Be willing to look at all sides of the issue • Be aware that qualitative research is messy!

More Related