1 / 12

Ed Miller Business Development Project Manager

2. Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Statements. This presentation includes forward-looking statements and projections, made in reliance on the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the

abe
Télécharger la présentation

Ed Miller Business Development Project Manager

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Ed Miller Business Development Project Manager El Paso Rockies Export Project August 30, 2005

    2. 2 Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Statements This presentation includes forward-looking statements and projections, made in reliance on the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and assumptions on which these statements and projections are based are current, reasonable, and complete. However, a variety of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this presentation, including, without limitation, the ability to implement and achieve our objectives in the long-range plan; changes in commodity prices for oil, natural gas, and power; inability to realize anticipated synergies and cost savings associated with restructurings and divestitures on a timely basis; our ability to obtain necessary governmental approvals for proposed pipeline projects and our ability to successfully construct and operate such projects; the risks associated with recontracting of transportation commitments by our pipelines; regulatory uncertainties associated with pipeline rate cases; general economic and weather conditions in geographic regions or markets served by El Paso Corporation and its affiliates, or where operations of the company and its affiliates are located; the uncertainties associated with governmental regulation; difficulty in integration of the operations of previously acquired companies, competition, and other factors described in the companys (and its affiliates) Securities and Exchange Commission filings. While the company makes these statements and projections in good faith, neither the company nor its management can guarantee that anticipated future results will be achieved. Reference must be made to those filings for additional important factors that may affect actual results. The company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any other forward-looking statements made by the company, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Id like to remind you that we will be making a number of forward-looking statements during this presentation and that a variety of factors apply to our ability to achieve future results.Id like to remind you that we will be making a number of forward-looking statements during this presentation and that a variety of factors apply to our ability to achieve future results.

    3. 3

    4. 4 Cheyenne Plains Throughput vs. Midcontinent

    5. 5 Projected Demand Growth

    6. 6 Connectivity / Liquidity (MMcf/d)

    7. 7 Cost of Capacity Shortage Out of Rockies Estimated Revenue Lost per Bcf/d of Rockies Production

    8. 8 Overview Two alternatives Opal to Campbellsville, Kentucky Opal to Perryville, Louisiana

    9. 9 Rockies Export Project Route Schematic Propose as seamless Downstream transport with rate certainty available as part of projects

    10. 10 Perryville Can be constructed economically for smaller volumes; minimal risk of delay; shortest and cheapest route Range of rates from $1.10 to $1.40/Dth from Opal to Perryville depending upon commitments (includes $7 fuel) Range of Rockies commitments required from 600 MDth/d up Additional seamless rates to Pugh (SNG Zone 1; TGP 500 Leg / 800 Leg; Transco Z3, Z4; PGT Z2, Z3; Tetco M-1); Lebanon, Cornell (DTI), Joliet Hub, and others Rates become more attractive as commitments increase Accesses highest demand growth area in the U.S. in southeast Recent Florida basis is $1.00 to Henry Late 2008 in-service Also directly accesses east coast pipelines and existing shippers Interim capacity available to Greensburg by March 2007 as part of project

    11. 11 Campbellsville Balances gaining close proximity to Northeast markets while minimizing risk of delays Avoids construction through Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio Based upon previous proposed projects, building through those states will cause 2-year delay or more to in-service Range of rates from $1.30 to $1.45/Dth from Opal (includes $7 fuel) Range of Rockies commitments required from 1.5 to 2 Bcf/d 500 MDth/d of downstream capacity available to Ellsworth (near Leidy area) on Tennessee More expensive than Perryville Late 2008 in-service Interim capacity available to Greensburg by March 2007 as part of project

    12. 12 Development Schedule One-on-one meetings with potential shippers through September to present detailed rates, route info, etc. Precedent Agreements September and October 2005 Begin NEPA work November 2005 Anticipated in-service late 2008 on either project

    13. 13 Contacts Contact myself or Laine Lobban to schedule detailed proposal presentation Ed Miller (719) 520-4305 Laine Lobban (719) 520-4344

More Related