1 / 44

Lead ( P b) R adius Ex periment : PREX

Lead ( P b) R adius Ex periment : PREX. 208. E = 850 MeV , electrons on lead. Elastic Scattering Parity Violating Asymmetry. 0. Z of Weak Interaction :. Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons. ( T.W. Donnelly, J. Dubach, I Sick ).

abel-oliver
Télécharger la présentation

Lead ( P b) R adius Ex periment : PREX

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lead( Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX 208 E = 850 MeV, electrons on lead Elastic Scattering Parity Violating Asymmetry 0 Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons ( T.W. Donnelly, J. Dubach, I Sick ) In PWIA (to illustrate) : 208Pb w/ Coulomb distortions (C. J. Horowitz) :

  2. Parity Violating Asymmetry 2 + Applications of PV at Jefferson Lab Applications of PV at Jefferson Lab • Nucleon Structure (strangeness) -- HAPPEX / G0 • Standard Model Tests ( ) -- e.g. Qweak • Nuclear Structure (neutron density): PREX

  3. Z of weak interaction : sees the neutrons 0 Analysis is clean, like electromagnetic scattering: 1. Probes the entire nuclear volume 2. Perturbation theory applies

  4. Reminder: Electromagnetic Scattering determines (charge distribution) 208 Pb 1 2 3

  5. Electron - Nucleus Potential axial electromagnetic is small, best observed by parity violation 208 Pb is spin 0 neutron weak charge >> proton weak charge Proton form factor Neutron form factor Parity Violating Asymmetry

  6. PREX: 2 Measurement at one Q is sufficient to measure R N ( R.J. Furnstahl ) Why only one parameter ? (next slide…) PREX error bar

  7. PREX: pins down the symmetry energy (1 parameter) energy cost for unequal # protons & neutrons PREX error bar ( R.J. Furnstahl ) 208 Pb PREX

  8. Nuclear Structure:Neutron density is a fundamental observable that remains elusive. Reflects poor understanding of symmetry energy of nuclear matter = the energy cost of ratio proton/neutrons n.m. density • Slope unconstrained by data • Adding R from Pb will eliminate the dispersion in plot. 208 N

  9. PREX & Neutron Stars ( C.J. Horowitz, J. Piekarweicz ) R calibrates EOS of Neutron Rich Matter N Crust Thickness Explain Glitches in Pulsar Frequency ? Combine PREX R with Obs. Neutron Star Radii N Phase Transition to “Exotic” Core ? Strange star ?Quark Star ? Some Neutron Stars seem too Cold Cooling by neutrino emission (URCA) 0.2 fm URCA probable, else not Crab Pulsar

  10. Liquid FP Solid TM1 Liquid/Solid Transition Density Neutron EOS and Neutron Star Crust ( C.J. Horowitz, J. Piekarweicz ) • Thicker neutron skin in Pb means energy rises rapidly with density  Quickly favors uniform phase. • Thick skin in Pb  low transition density in star. Fig. fromJ.M. Lattimer & M. Prakash, Science 304 (2004) 536.

  11. Pb Radius vs Neutron Star Radius ( C.J. Horowitz, J. Piekarweicz ) • The 208Pb radius constrains the pressure of neutron matter at subnuclear densities. • The NS radius depends on the pressure at nuclear density and above. • Most interested in density dependence of equation of state (EOS) from a possible phase transition. • Important to have both low density and high density measurements to constrain density dependence of EOS. • If Pb radius is relatively large: EOS at low density is stiff with high P. If NS radius is small than high density EOS soft. • This softening of EOS with density could strongly suggest a transition to an exotic high density phase such as quark matter, strange matter, color superconductor, kaon condensate…

  12. PREX Constrains Rapid Direct URCA Cooling of Neutron Stars • Proton fraction Yp for matter in beta equilibrium depends on symmetry energy S(n). • Rn in Pb determines density dependence of S(n). • The larger Rn in Pb the lower the threshold mass for direct URCA cooling. • If Rn-Rp<0.2 fm all EOS models do not have direct URCA in 1.4 M¯ stars. • If Rn-Rp>0.25 fm all models do have URCA in 1.4 M¯ stars. ( C.J. Horowitz, J. Piekarweicz ) Rn-Rp in 208Pb If Yp > red line NS cools quickly via direct URCA reaction n p+e+

  13. Impact onAtomic Parity Violation • Low Q test of Standard Model • Needs R to make further progress. 2 Isotope Chain Experiments e.g. Berkeley Yb N APV

  14. Corrections to the Asymmetry are Mostly Negligible • Coulomb Distortions ~20% = the biggest correction. • Transverse Asymmetry (to be measured) • Strangeness • Electric Form Factor of Neutron • Parity Admixtures • Dispersion Corrections • Meson Exchange Currents • Shape Dependence • Isospin Corrections • Radiative Corrections • Excited States • Target Impurities Horowitz, et.al. PRC 63 025501

  15. PREX: Experimental Issues Spokespersons: P.A. Souder, G.M. Urciuoli, R. Michaels Hall A Collaboration Experiment

  16. Pol. Source Hall A CEBAF PREX in Hall A at JLab Spectometers Lead Foil Target

  17. Polarized e- Source Hall A Hall A at Jefferson Lab

  18. High Resolution Spectrometers Spectrometer Concept: Resolve Elastic 1st excited state Pb 2.6 MeV Elastic detector Inelastic Quad Left-Right symmetry to control transverse polarization systematic target Dipole Q Q

  19. Polarized Electron Source Laser GaAs Crystal Pockel Cell flips helicity Halfwave plate (retractable, reverses helicity) Gun - e beam • Rapid, random helicity reversal • Electrical isolation from rest of lab • Feedback on Intensity Asymmetry

  20. P I T AEffect Important Systematic : Polarization Induced Transport Asymmetry Intensity Asymmetry Laser at Pol. Source where Transport Asymmetry drifts, but slope is ~ stable. Feedback on

  21. Intensity Feedback Adjustments for small phase shifts to make close to circular polarization HAPPEX Low jitter and high accuracy allows sub-ppm Cumulative charge asymmetry in ~ 1 hour ~ 2 hours In practice, aim for 0.1 ppm over duration of data-taking.

  22. X Angle BPM Beam Position Corrections (HAPPEX) Beam Asymmetry Results Energy: -0.25 ppb X Target: 1 nm X Angle: 2 nm Y Target : 1 nm Y Angle: <1 nm micron Corrected and Raw, Left spectrometer arm alone, Superimposed! Total correction for beam position asymmetry on Left, Right, or ALL detector:10 ppb ppm Spectacular results from HAPPEX-H show we can do PREX.

  23. Integrating Detection • Integrate in 30 msec helicity period. • Deadtime free. • 18 bit ADC with < 10 nonlinearity. • But must separate backgrounds & inelastics ( HRS). - 4 Integrator Calorimeter(for lead, fits in palm of hand) ADC PMT electrons

  24. Flux Integration Technique: HAPPEX: 2 MHz PREX: 850 MHz The Raw Asymmetry

  25. Application of Parity Violating Electron Scattering : HAPPEX & Strange Quarks Hall AProton Parity Experiment 4 Isolating the u, d, s quark structure in protons (and He) Electromagnetic Scattering: Parity Violation can Access:

  26. Asymmetry (ppm) Slug 1H Preliminary 2006 Results Raw Parity Violating Asymmetry Araw correction ~11 ppb Helicity Window Pair Asymmetry Q2 = 0.1089 ± 0.0011GeV2 Araw = -1.418 ppm 0.105 ppm (stat)

  27. Strange FF near ~0.1 GeV2 GMs = 0.28 +/- 0.20 GEs = -0.006 +/- 0.016 ~3% +/- 2.3% of proton magnetic moment ~0.2 +/- 0.5% of electric distribution Preliminary

  28. Hydrogen: 86.7% ± 2% Helium: 84.0% ± 2.5% PolarimetryAccuracy :2 % required, 1% desired Preliminary Møller : dPe/Pe ~ 3 %(limit: foil polarization) (a high field target ala Hall C being considered) Compton : 2% syst. at present Prelim. HAPPEX Results

  29. Upgrade of Compton Polarimeter electrons To reach 1% accuracy: • Green Laser (increased sensitivity at low E) •  laser on-hand, being tested • Integrating Method (removes some systematics of analyzing power) •  developed during HAPPEX & in 2006 • New Photon Detector

  30. Optimum Kinematics for Lead Parity: E = 850 MeV, <A> = 0.5 ppm. Accuracy in Asy 3% Fig. of merit Min. error in R maximize: n 1 month run 1% in R n

  31. Lead Target 208 Pb Liquid Helium Coolant 12 beam C Diamond Backing: • High Thermal Conductivity • Negligible Systematics Beam, rastered 4 x 4 mm

  32. PREX : Summary • Fundamental Nuclear Physics with many applications • HAPPEX & test runs have demonstrated technical aspects • Polarimetry Upgrade needed • Will run 1 month in 2008

  33. Extra Slides

  34. Measured Asymmetry PREX Physics Impact Correct for Coulomb Distortions 2 Weak Density at one Q Mean Field Small Corrections for s n & Other G MEC G Atomic Parity Violation E E Models 2 Neutron Density at one Q Assume Surface Thickness Good to 25% (MFT) Neutron Stars Heavy Ions R n

  35. Asymmetry (ppm) Slug 4He Preliminary 2006 Results Raw Parity Violating Asymmetry Araw correction ~ 0.12 ppm Helicity Window Pair Asymmetry Q2 = 0.07725 ± 0.0007 GeV2 Araw = 5.253 ppm 0.191 ppm (stat)

  36. Optimization for Barium -- of possible direct use for Atomic PV 1 GeV optimum

  37. 208 Pb Elastic Lead Target Tests Data taken Nov 2005 Detector Num. events 1st Excited State (2.6 MeV) • Check rates • Backgrounds (HRS is clean) • Sensitivity to beam parameters • Width of asymmetry • HRS resolution • Detector resolution Momentum (MeV) Num. events Y (m) X (dispersive coord) (m)

  38. Neutron Skin and Heavy – Ion Collisions • Impact on Heavy - Ion physics: constraints and predictions • Imprint of the EOS left in the flow and fragmentation distribution. Danielewicz, Lacey, and Lynch, Science 298 (2002) 1592.

  39. Example : Recent Pion Photoproduction B. Krusche arXiv:nucl-ex/0509003 Sept 2005 This paper obtains !! Proton – Nucleus Elastic: Mean Field Theory PREX accuracy

  40. Transverse Polarization Part I: Left/Right Asymmetry Transverse Asymmetry Systematic Error for Parity Theory est. (Afanasev) “Error in” Left-right apparatus asymmetry Transverse polarization Control w/ slow feedback on polarized source solenoids. measure in ~ 1 hr (+ 8 hr setup) HRS-Left HRS-Right < < Need correction syst. err.

  41. Transverse Polarization Part II: Up/Down Asymmetry Vertical misalignment Systematic Error for Parity Horizontal polarization e.g. from (g-2) • Measured in situ using 2-piece detector. • Study alignment with tracking & M.C. • Wien angle feedback ( ) up/down misalignment Need HRS-Left HRS-Right < < ) ( Note, beam width is very tiny

  42. Noise • Need 100 ppm per window pair • Position noise already good enough • New 18-bit ADCs  Will improve BCM noise. • Careful about cable runs, PMTs, grounds.  Will improve detector noise. • Plan: Tests with Luminosity Monitor to demonstrate capability.

  43. Warm Septum Existing superconducting septum won’t work at high L Warm low energy (1 GeV) magnet designed. Grant proposal in preparation (~100 k$) [Syracuse / Smith College] TOSCA design P resolution ok

  44. 2 Measurement at one Q is sufficient to measure R Pins down the symmetry energy (1 parameter) N PREX accuracy PREX accuracy ( R.J. Furnstahl )

More Related