80 likes | 194 Vues
This document discusses the experiences of the Scytl team in implementing EML v2 IEEE standards for electronic voting systems across 10 states. Notable achievements include onscreen marking, blank ballot delivery, and numerous standard interfaces for voter interaction, ballot definition, and tracking. The document highlights the diverse formats encountered, challenges in integrating with various election administration systems, and considerations for various voting methods, including straight party and federal ballots. Key takeaways include lessons learned and conclusions drawn from this extensive implementation experience.
E N D
Usage of EMLv2IEEE Standards Working Group P-1622 on Voting Systems Electronic Data InterchangeFebruary 9, 2011Aaron WilsonElection Operations Consultantaaron.wilson@scytl.com
2010 MOVE EVSW Implementation Experience • Scytl worked with 10 States • 9 Onscreen marking and blank ballot delivery • 1 Blank ballot only • Voter Interfaces – 13 (CSV, XML) • Ballot Definition Interfaces – 12 (CSV, XML) • EMS Vendor created file format • “home-grown” files format • Ballot Return Interfaces – 7 (CSV, XML, web-services) • Ballot tracking • Ballot duplication • Each format had multiple integrations • Formats represented many variations in election administration • Straight party voting • Candidate rotation • Federal only ballots • Latin and non-Latin languages • Formatting • Etc.