30 likes | 136 Vues
This essay critically evaluates the thought-provoking ideas about cities and the environmental debate presented in different passages. By closely examining the contrasts in perspectives, styles, and arguments, it explores the effectiveness of engaging with the complexity of urban and environmental issues.
E N D
15. Which passage do you think offers the more thought-provoking ideas aboutthe nature of cities?Justify your choice by close reference to the ideas of both passages 5 marks (2010)
12. Which passage is more effective in engaging your interest in aspects of the environmental debate? Justify your choice by referring to the ideas and style of both passages. 5 (2009)
13. In Passage 1 David Sinclair refers to the claims of conservationists as“palpablynonsensical” and in Passage 2 Richard Morrison states that their views are “hogwash”. Which writer is more successful in convincing you that these conservationists’ claims are seriously flawed? • Justify your choice by referring to the ideas and/or style of both passages. 5 (2008)