1 / 13

Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders

Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders. Developments Dutch PIN Community for the CIM user group meeting Prague 2011. Subjects. Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance. PIN membership and associations. Goal. 2010 Milan 5 Organizations. 2011 Prague

acton-pruitt
Télécharger la présentation

Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders Developments Dutch PIN Community for the CIM user group meeting Prague 2011

  2. Subjects • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Ourambitionsfor 2011 • CIM governance

  3. PIN membership and associations Goal 2010 Milan • 5 Organizations • 2011 Prague • 7 Organizations Talks with:

  4. Subjects • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Ourambitionsfor 2011 • CIM governance

  5. Developments 2011 (1/2) Regulators Covering vision, standards, governance SECTOR Standards Vision Taskforce Intelligent Grids National Main issue Standards & Interoperability Together, Dutch Grid Operators Connect Re-use Share Regional EU Taskforce SG International FERC Organize & prioritize Make & harmonize Regulate

  6. Developments 2011 (2/2) • 2010-07 Final document Dutch TF Smart Grid • 2011-01 Final public consultation document Dutch TF Smart Grid • PIN input was used for future steps on standards and interoperability • 2011-02/06 AgentschapNL is forming SG platform. Forseen tasks: • Dutch Conceptual model.(similar to NIST) • Selection criteria for standards and determine priorities • Shortlist of relevant standards for the Netherlands • Ensuring contribution on international standards (Based on comply or explain on int. standards and best practices) • DSO’s and TSO are no competitors, we seek synergy Taskforce Intelligent Grids

  7. Subjects • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Ourambitionsfor 2011 • CIM governance

  8. Our ambitions for 2011 • Support the Dutch SG platform on: • Delivering a set of standards with core and high relevance for the Netherlands (incl. E-Govermental standards) • Deliver a set of business issues which can be supported by those standards. Examples of data exchange: • between gridoperator and regulator (CODATA) • between TSO an DSO • between DSO and Serviceproviders(= Project DURF digital exchange of revision data of grid components and topology) • Delivering a set of selection-criteria for adopting standards • Delivering a development-proces description that can be used by the dutch grid operators.

  9. Subjects • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Ourambitionsfor 2011 • CIM governance

  10. CIM Governance (1/4) Applying CIM… Before: Project Non-standard interface Time, knowledge and otherconstraints Current: Project Architecture: usestandard Non-standard interface Time, knowledge and otherconstraints Desired: Project Architecture: usestandard Knowledgeavailable Standardsreused Standardized interface

  11. CIM Governance (2/4) Common Information Model Experts organized Formal representation Managed by IEC CIM CIM model manager CIMug IEC 57 International standardization Regional CIM Profile Regional profile manager ENTSO-E Data expert group ENTSO-E SDC/SOC/MC Regional standardization National CIM profiles National model manager PIN NEC 57 (NEN working group) National standardization Local CIM Local data manager Local CIM experts Participation in groups Local standardization * CIM represents CIM and otherstandardslike 61850, BAG (Dutch), GBKN (Dutch), KVK (Dutch), etc.

  12. CIM Governance (3/4) The idea… National standardization committee TC 57 PIN Subject representative Organized knowledge Organized knowledge Companies

  13. CIM Governance (4/4) • Challenges to the PIN Group and to company standardization coordinators: • How to unite the CIM (and other standards) knowledge in a kind of competence center? How do you organize that? • How to ascertain that CIM interpretations are the same within all parts of the company / group of companies? • How to organize business and IT stakeholders around the CIM? How do you prevent ‘islands’ to be formed? I wouldlike to come back fromPraguewith a set of working (or best) practices.

More Related