1 / 25

Different Ways of Looking at the World

Different Ways of Looking at the World. Different Ways of Looking at the World. Difficult to keep track of - social, political, economic characteristics of each country in the world ⁂ easier to group countries using common characteristics examples include: “ First World ”

Télécharger la présentation

Different Ways of Looking at the World

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Different Ways of Looking at the World

  2. Different Ways of Looking at the World • Difficult to keep track of - social, political, economic characteristics of each country in the world • ⁂ easier to group countries using common characteristics • examples include: • “First World” • “Developing Nation” • “North/South Split

  3. Developed - Developing Countries • Economic development used to group countries – not the only characteristic that determines development • Popular because its simple • Criticism - imprecise - groups too large • Not static - allows for countries to move from undeveloped to developing

  4. Developed and Developing

  5. North - South • Most developed nations located north of equator • Most developing nations located south of the equator • Some countries do not fit pattern - New Zealand, Argentina and Australia • ⁂ terms Temperate and Tropical may be more accurate

  6. North & South Split

  7. First/Second/Third World • 3 world model developed in 1950’s • Based on development (economic) & on political alignment • Countries like Cuba, China & Vietnam did not fit • Had characteristics of 2nd World & some of 3rd world

  8. First World - Third World

  9. Five World • A compromise between accuracy and simplicity • 3rd-5th Worlds describe developing countries in different stages of development • 2nd World countries disappeared (with fall of communism) - some moved to 1st world and others to 3rd-5th worlds • No longer fits in a world increasingly influenced by the forces of globalization

  10. Five Worlds

  11. New Way of Grouping Countries • Core/Periphery Country Classification • Consider the degree to which each country is an active participant in a globalized world

  12. Economic Development For Grouping Countries • A community’s material wealth and trade • Determined by such things as: per-captia GDP, ratio of cars to people, and per-capita electrical power capacity,

  13. Social Characteristics For Grouping Countries • Level of education, healthcare, life expectancy, and rate of infant mortality in a society

  14. Political Characteristics For Grouping Countries • Determined by whether country is democratic • Level of corruption • Presence of functional and established electoral system and rule of law • Freedom House rankings - measure political rights and civil liberties • Rating 2-5 - considered free • Rating 6-10 - considered partly free • Rating 11-14 - considered not free

  15. Globalized Core (Core) • Countries that have contributed significantly to and benefited greatly from globalization • Countries in this group are relatively wealthy, comfortable lifestyles, advanced economies • Good healthcare, live in secure environment • High degree of freedom, gov’ts are generally free of corruption • Eg. Canada, US, Germany, Australia, UK

  16. Less Globalized Periphery (Periphery) • Poorer than the “Core” countries • People have less personal security • Limited political freedom and civil liberties • Corruption is almost always a serious problem • Eg. Bangladesh, Zambia, Congo, Kenya

  17. In Between Countries • Most countries are somewhere in between the core and periphery • Makes more sense to divide the in between nations into 2 groups - lots of variation between these countries

  18. Countries in Between • Countries like Poland & Malaysia are generally members of the Core but are not at the same level as countries like Canada & Germany • Not as wealthy, gov’t not as democratic • As years pass becoming more like Canada and Germany • ⁂ need to divide “Core” into 2 groups • Old Core and New Core

  19. Countries in Between • Periphery can be divided into 2 groups as well • Iran and Philippines are more advanced than countries like Bangladesh and Zambia • With continued economic, social & political growth - have potential to join Core in future • These countries can be called Near-Core Periphery (Periphery)

  20. Countries in Between • Countries like Bangladesh & Zambia it will take longer for these countries to become fully functioning members of the global world • These countries are part of the Far Periphery

  21. Grouping the World’s Nations

  22. Grouping the World’s Nations

More Related