1 / 50

The ALICE Experiment at LHC: Detector & Physics

The ALICE Experiment at LHC: Detector & Physics. V. Manzari INFN & University of Bari - Italy. XI Frascati Spring School “Bruno Touschek” LNF, May 15th – 19th, 2006. Contents. Nucleus-nucleus collisions at the LHC The Alice experiment Overview of Alice subsystems Physics Examples

adonica
Télécharger la présentation

The ALICE Experiment at LHC: Detector & Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The ALICE Experiment at LHC:Detector & Physics V. Manzari INFN & University of Bari - Italy XI Frascati Spring School “Bruno Touschek” LNF, May 15th – 19th, 2006

  2. Contents • Nucleus-nucleus collisions at the LHC • The Alice experiment • Overview of Alice subsystems • Physics Examples • Jet quenching • Heavy flavours • Conclusions Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  3. QCD tells us… • Ultimate goal: understanding of the QCD phase diagram - QCD prediction  the existence of a new state of matter at high temperature, the quark Gluon Plasma • Tc173 MeV, mq0, Nf=2,3 • Order of the transition? • c 0.3-1.3 GeV/fm3 • LHC will allow to go much deeper into a QGP phase and to study the QGP equation of state. Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  4. Central collisions SPS RHIC LHC s1/2(GeV) 17 200 5500 dNch/dy 500 850 2–8 x 103 e (GeV/fm3) 2.5 4–5 15–40 Vf(fm3) 103 7x103 2x104 tQGP (fm/c) <1 1.5–4.0 4–10 t0 (fm/c) ~1 ~0.5 <0.2 SPS to RHIC to LHC • QGP is characterized by two qualitatives changes: deconfinement & chiral simmetry restoration • Both changes will certainly have consequences in the final state observed by the experimental apparatus  Energy per NN LHC ≈ 30 x RHIC  Initial energy density LHC ≈ 3  10 x RHIC  Volume LHC ≈ 3 x RHIC  QGP lifetime LHC ≈ 3 x RHIC  Formation time LHC ≈ 1/3 x RHIC • Initial condition at LHC different than at RHIC: “hotter – bigger – longer lived” Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  5. Novel aspects… soft processes • The energy increase at LHC will make accessible a novel range of Bjorken-x - solid lines  relevant x-M2 ranges for particle production • Probe initial partonic state in a “new” Bjorken-x range (10-3- 10-5): - nuclear shadowing • high-density saturated gluon distribution (CGC) Energy increase  lower x   RHIC forward region  LHC mid rapidity (easier detection) Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  6. Novel aspects… hard processes • Hard processes contribute significantly to total AA cross-section: (σhard/σtot = 98%) • Bulk properties dominated by hard processes • Hard probes abundantly produced • Hard processes are extremely useful tools: • Probe matter at very early times • Hard processes can be calculated by pQCD • Heavy quarks and Weakly interacting probes become accessible (Z0, W±) 5500 GeV Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  7. 5.5 1027 70-50 106 ** 7.7 LHC as Ion Collider • Running conditions: • Expected Pb-Pb luminosity  rather low minimum-bias interaction rate (≈8kHz): - LHC detectors in heavy ion mode  lower rates & higher particle density • + other collision systems: pA, lighter ions (Sn, Kr, Ar, O) & energies (pp @ 5.5 TeV) √sNN (TeV) L0 (cm-2s-1) <L>/L0 (%) Run time (s/year) sgeom (b) Collision system pp 14.0 1034 * 107 0.07 PbPb *Lmax (ALICE) = 1031 ** Lint (ALICE) ~ 0.7 nb-1/year Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  8. One dedicated HI experiment: ALICE Two pp experiments with HI program: ATLAS and CMS Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  9. ALICE Detector • Large acceptance • Good tracking capabilities • Selective triggering • Excellent granularity • Wide momentum coverage • PID of hadrons and leptons • Good secondary vertex reconstruction • Photon detection Adopted a variety of experimental techiniques AA Physics Menu at LHC • Global properties • Multiplicities, η distributions, zero degree energy • Event history • HBT • Resonance decays • Fluctuations and critical behaviour • Event-by-event particle composition & spectroscopy • Neutral to charged ratio • Degrees of Freedom vs Temperature • Hadron ratios and spectra • Dilepton continuum • Direct photons • Collective effects • Elliptic flow • Deconfinement, chiral simmetry restoration • Charmonium, bottonium spectroscopy • (Multi-)strange particles • Partonic energy loss in QGP • Jet quenching, high pT spectra • Open charm and beauty Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  10. ALICE: The dedicated HI experiment • ALICE is a general purpose experiment designed to study the physics of strongly interacting matter and the quark-gluon plasma in nucleus-nucleus collisions. • ALICE will meet the challenge to measure flavour content and phase-space distribution event-by-event at the highest particle multiplicities anticipated for Pb-Pb collisions: • Most (2p * 1.8 units h) of the hadrons (dE/dx + TOF), leptons (dE/dx, transition radiation, magnetic analysis) and photons (high resolution EM calorimetry). • Track and identify from very low pt (< 100 MeV/c; soft processes) up to very high pt (>100 GeV/c; hard processes). • Identify short lived particles (hyperons, D/B meson) through • secondary vertex detection. • Identify jets. Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  11. Solenoid magnet 0.5 T Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  12. Central Solenoid: from L3 (LEP) Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  13. Central tracking & PID system: • ITS • TPC • TRD • TOF Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  14. Central Tracking & PID |h|<0.9: B = 0.4 T TOF (3.7 – 4 m) TRD (2.9 - 3.7 m) TPC (85 - 250 cm) ITS (4 -45 cm) with: - Si pixel - Si drift - Si strip Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  15. Combined momentum resolution at low momentum dominated by - ionization-loss fluctuations - multiple scattering at high momentum determined by - point measurement precision - alignment & calibration (assumed ideal here) resolution ~ 7% at 100 GeV/c excellent performance in hard region! Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  16. Inner Tracking System (ITS) • longitudinal coverage: • |h| < 1 (tracking), |h|<2 (multiplicity) Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  17. Picture of a solder bump bond (courtesy of VTT) bump-bonded assembly Sensor Chip bump-bonded assembly Sensor (200 µm thickness) Chip (150 µm thickness) ITS: Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) • 2 layers, r = 3.9, 7.6 cm • sensitive length (in z): 28.6 cm (for both layers) • hybrid (bump-bonded) silicon pixel assemblies • Pb/Sn bumps • pixel size: 50 × 425 µm2 • binary r/o • module size: 12.8 × 69.6 mm2 • 240 modules • 9.8 M channels Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  18. The Half Cylinders and their tooling Front view Half-Barrel final assembly ITS: Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) • successful system beam test Oct. ’04 including full FEE and DAQ, DCS, ECS Combined with the other ITS detector systems • bump bonding at VTT (Finland) • series production started (e > 99%) • low-mass support/cooling sectors ready • assembly sites in Bari and Padova • Status • “ready for installation”: Nov ‘06 • viable schedule, but tight & little contingency Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  19. Sector 0 (mixed bus) Sector 1 (full Al bus) SPD Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  20. ITS: Silicon Drift Detector (SDD) • Hybrids : • 520 needed; production completed; done in industry • Modules: • 260 needed; assembly completed: June ‘06 • Ladders: • 36 needed; production ongoing assembly completed: July ‘07 • Mechanics • Components ready for assembly • Status: - ready for integration with SSD: Jul ‘06 View of modules with two hybrids; Was used in 2004 beam test Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  21. ITS: Silicon Strip Detector (SSD) Ramping of component delivery and assembly • Production: • sensors from three vendors under production • FEE electronics: all chips in production • micro-cables & hybrids (Ukraine): • very advanced technology • Assembly: • shared between 4 ( later 5) sites (Finland, France, Italy); pre-production validated • Status: • Ready for integration with SDD: Jul ’06 • SDD+SSD ready for installation: Sep. ‘06 p-Hybrid Sensor n-Hybrid Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  22. E E E E 88us 510 cm Time Projection Chamber (TPC) GAS VOLUME 88 m3 DRIFT GAS 90% Ne 10% CO2 Field cage finished FEE finished Read out chamber finished At present: pre-integration of field cage into experiment Readout plane segmentation 18 trapezoidal sectors each covering 20 degrees in azimuth Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  23. TPC Mounting the TPC Central Electrode With 10-4 parallelism to readout chambers Completed Readout chamber installation Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  24. Fully equipped TRD chamber Transition Radiation Detector (TRD) Pad chambers with a total of 1 200 000 channels Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  25. Time-Of-Flight (TOF) • Multi-gap RPC • high performance: 50 ps resolution achieved! Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  26. Testbeam Cosmic rays σ(TOF) ~ 60 ps TOF: performance and construction • Detector -Strip production: 20/week to increase to 40/week with 2nd automated assembly line -Finished : 11/06 -Module assembly : start 06/05; finish : 11/06 • Supermodules : installation test with mock-up done successfully • Start SuperModules installation July/August ‘06 Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  27. ITS/TPC/TRD/TOF Pre-Integration Pre-Integration of ITS/TPC/TRD/ TOF/vacuum chamber April 2005 Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  28. Specialized detectors: • HMPID • PHOS Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  29. High Momentum Particle Identification (HMPID) - Detector production (7 modules) finished -CsI-cathode 35/42 ready and performance better than specified - Ready for Installation: July ‘06 Sensitivity of cathodes Required: >12 clusters Measured: >18 clusters for relativistic particles Cathode uniformity ~ 5 % Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  30. single arm em calorimeter photons, g-jet tagging dense, high granularity (2x2x18cm3) crystals novel material: PbW04 ~18 k channels, ~ 8 m2 cooled to -25o PbW04 crystal Photon Spectrometer (PHOS) PbW04: Very dense: X0 < 0.9 cm Good energy resolution (after 6 years R&D): stochastic 2.7% / E1/2 noise 2.5% / E constant 1.3% Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  31. MUON Spectrometer: • absorbers • tracking stations • trigger chambers • dipole Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  32. Muon Magnet :world’s largest warm dipole Muon Filter Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  33. Muon Tracking System • Advanced ‘Pad-chamber’ system with • 1.2* 106 readout channels • Sagitta resolution of < 50 μm for • Mass resolution of ~ 80 MeV at Upsilon • Production of chambers in • France, India, Italy, Russia • Scheduled to be finished end 2005 Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  34. Cosmic rays trigger • Forward detectors: • PMD • FMD, T0, V0, ZDC Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  35. Trigger Counters T0/V0/FMD/Accorde Accorde: large area Scintillator + PM trigger on Cosmic rays V0: Scintillator + PM FMD: Si m-strips T0: Quartz-C + PM Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  36. Physics Examples: • Jet Quenching • Heavy Flavours Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  37. Jets in QCD: - Cascades of consecutive emissions of partons initiated by partons from an initial hard scattering; - Parton fragmentation  showering and hadronization. In-medium effects  modifications of the jet structure: Reduction of single inclusive high pt particles: - Parton specific (stronger for gluons than quarks) - Flavour specific (stronger for light quarks)  Measure identified hadrons (p, K, p, Λ, etc.) + heavy partons (charm, beauty) at high pT Change of fragmentation function for hard jets (pt>>10 GeV/c) - Transverse and longitudinal fragmentation functions of jets - Jet broadening  reduction of jet energy, dijets, g-jet pairs - Suppression of mini-jets: same-side/away-side correlations Jet quenching Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  38. Experimentally • Highest sensitivity to the medium properties: - modifications of the reconstructed jets - partonic energy loss  decrease particles carrying a high fraction of the jet energy and appearance of radiated energy via an increase of low-energy particles - broadening of the distribution of jet-particle momenta • Measurement of Jet Energy: • In present configuration Alice measures only charged particles ( and electromagnetic energy in PHOS) • The large EM Calorimeter will improve the jet energy resolution, increase the selection efficiency and further reduce the bias on the jet fragmentation + jet trigger capabilities needed to increase the statistics at high Et. • Measurement of Jet Structure very important: • Requires good momentum analysis from ~ 1 GeV/c to ~ 100 GeV/c • Alice excels in this domain • pp and pA measurements essential as reference! Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  39. Energy domains for jet reconstruction 2 GeV20 GeV 100 GeV 200 GeV Mini-Jets 100/event 1/event 100k/month • Event structure and properties • at p > 2 GeV/c • Correlation studies • Limit is given by underlying event • Reconstructed Jets • Event-by-event well • distinguishable objects Example : 100 GeV jet + underlying event Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  40. e.g.: for 100 GeV jet Reduced cone size... • Large underlaying hadron background  reduced cone size R • Central PbPb at √s=5.5 TeV • dNch/dy = 2000-8000 • dET/dh ~ 1.5-6 TeV • Energy in R < 0.7: 0.4 -1.5 TeV • Problems • Identification... • Energy resolution: background fluctuations comparable to jet energy • use smaller cone size, R ~ 0.3 Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  41. Jet quenching? • Excellent jet reconstruction… but challenging to measure global medium modification … • Et=100 GeV (reduced average jet energy fraction inside R): • Radiated energy ~20% • R=0.3 : dE/E=3% • Most of radiated energy stays within cone •  • Jet quenching rather means a medium-induced redistribution of the jet energy inside the jet cone Jet shape: average fraction of energy in a sub-cone of radius R Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  42. Low-pT tracking essential... Simple quenching model: The energy loss of a 100 GeV jet is simulated by reducing the energy of the jet by 20% and replacing the missing energy by: 1 x 20 GeV gluon 2 x 10 GeV gluons 4 x 5 GeV gluons (Jets simulated with Pythia) Summary: • ALICE combines low-pt tracking and PID  study of the jet-structure over a wide range of momenta and particle species. • Jet reconstruction restricted to relatively high-energy jets (Et>30-40 GeV) while leading particle correlation studies play an important role in the low-Et region. Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  43. Heavy Flavours • LHC is the first machine where heavy quarks will be produced abundantly in heavy-ion collisions. • Heavy flavour production in pp and AA collisions to pt ≈0: - open charm and open beauty: - mechanism of heavy-quark production, propagation and hadronisation (in-medium quenching compared to massless partons) - cross sections as a reference for quarkonia production  excellent impact parameter resolution (secondary vertex) and PID capability  wide pt range - quarkonia: - yields and pt spectra of J/Y, Y’, , ’ and ’:  e+e- in central region and m+m- in forward region Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  44. Heavy flavour energy loss? • Energy loss for heavy flavours is expected to be reduced  • harder pt spectra for heavy- wrt light-flavour mesons: i) Casimir factor • light hadrons originate predominantly from gluon jets, heavy flavoured hadrons originate from heavy quark jets • CR is 4/3 for quarks, 3 for gluons ii) dead-cone effect • gluon radiation expected to be suppressed for q < MQ/EQ (heavy quarks with momenta < 20-30 GeV/c  v << c) [Dokshitzer & Karzeev,Phys. Lett. B519 (2001) 199] [Armesto et al., Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 114003] average energy loss Casimir coupling factor distance travelled in the medium transport coefficient of the medium ( gluon density  probe the medium)  R.Baier et al., Nucl. Phys. B483 (1997) 291 (“BDMPS”) Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  45. RAA(D) in ALICE • The dead cone effect can be studied in the pt-dependence of the nuclear modification factor RAA ‘High’ pT (6–15 GeV/c) Energy loss can be studied (it is the only expected effect) Low pT (< 6–7 GeV/c) Nuclear shadowing Nuclear modification factor: production yield in AA collisions normalized to elementary pp collisions, scaled with the number of binary collisions  good sensitivity for measurement of c quenching Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  46. expected d0 resolution (s) Detection strategy for D0 K-p+ • Weak decay with mean proper length ct = 124 μm • Track Impact Parameter (distance of closest approach of a track to the primary vertex) of the decay products d0 ~ 100 μm • STRATEGY: invariant mass analysis of fully-reconstructed topologies originating from (displaced) secondary vertices - Measurement of Impact Parameters - Measurement of Momenta - Particle identification to tag the two decay products Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  47. statistical. systematic. D0 K-p+ • expected ALICE performance • S/B ≈ 10 % • S/(S+B) ≈ 40 (1 month Pb-Pb running)  similar performance in pp (wider primary vertex spread) pT - differential Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  48. Proposed ALICE EMCAL • To improve the capabilities in triggering and measurement of high energy jets • EM Sampling Calorimeter (STAR Design) • Pb-scintillator linear response • -0.7 < h < 0.7 • p/3 < F < p (opposite to PHOS) • Energy resolution ~15%/√E • Rails already installed • Support structure funded by DoE, • to be installed this summer • 10 +1/2+1/2 Supermodules (SM) • 1 SM = 24x12 modules • 1 module = 4 channels : • 1.2 x 104 total channels (granularity) Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  49. EMCAL • Single detector : 6x6x25 cm3 shashlik 1.44mm Pb/1.76mm scintillator sampling • 77 layers = 20 Xo • WLS fiber+APD readout • Front End Electronics mainly developed for TPC and PHOS • First SM to be ready for 2008 run • Full Calorimeter to be completed for 2010 run EMCAL Project: Italy (LNF, Ct) + France + US Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

  50. Conclusions • LHC • the next jump in heavy-ion physics “it is dangerous to make predictions, especially about the future” • significant extension of reach at both soft and hard frontiers • ALICE • dedicated heavy-ion experiment • address most relevant observables, from very soft to very hard • novel technologies! • production well under way • Busy months ahead  working detector well on track for the start-up of LHC (summer 2007) • Study collisions of lower-mass ions (varying energy density) and protons (pp and pA) as reference • pp data will also allow for a number of genuine pp physics studies we are looking forward towards exciting times! Frascati Spring School, May 15th -19th, 2006

More Related