1 / 19

The self-annihilation cross section

Upper Bound on the Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section Gregory Mack CCAPP/The Ohio State University. The self-annihilation cross section. How large can the self-annihilation cross section be? That’s the question to ask Most often assumed – “natural scale” 3 x 10 -26 cm 3 /s.

aelan
Télécharger la présentation

The self-annihilation cross section

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Upper Bound on the Dark Matter Annihilation Cross SectionGregory MackCCAPP/The Ohio State University

  2. The self-annihilation cross section • How large can the self-annihilation cross section be? • That’s the question to ask • Most often assumed – “natural scale” • 3 x 10-26 cm3/s

  3. Early playing field • First: Unitarity • Limit from Q.M. • The probabilities for elastic and inelastic scattering must sum to 1 • Unitarity of the scattering matrix

  4. Early playing field • Second: KKT • Take a cuspy profile and turn it into a core • KKT would need a BR of about 10-10 to not be seen in monoenergetic photons • Say it must be “invisible particles”

  5. No invisible products: essentially two classes of annihilation products • Photons (direct or eventual) • Hadrons  pions  photons • Charged leptons  radiative loss/internal brehmsstrahlung • Gauge bosons  charged leptons • Monoenergetic Photons • Neutrinos • Sum of probabilities = 100% • Compare background fluxes to theoretical signals

  6. Theoretical Signals • Depends on if you’re looking at: • diffuse contribution from all galaxies • Need to integrate over redshift and include the fact that dark matter is clumped in galaxies • Galactic halo (at some angle from GC) • External galaxy (M 31) • DM halo line-of-sight int. • DEPENDS ON PROFILE

  7. Regardless, divide background into energy bins to look Neutrinos Atmospheric neutrino background. Photons INTEGRAL, COMPTEL, EGRET, CELESTE, HESS, HEGRA

  8. Combined constraint for 2 photons • Results for Kravtsov profile (NFW = lighter) • Wide range of masses • Limit takes the most stringent value at each mass

  9. TOTAL cross section limits • Wide-ranging model-indep. limit • Conservative, comprehensive • Gamma limit is comparable to Neutrino Mack, Beacom, Bell, Jacques, Yüksel Astro-ph/0803.0157v2 (PRD)

  10. More cross section limits • New limits on photons coming from internal brehmsstrahlung from charged leptons • Bell and Jacques • Astro-ph/0811.0821v1

  11. More cross section limits

  12. Conclusions • We have the capability to make statements about the amount of annihilation dark matter experiences • General, comprehensive limits • Better data means tighter constraints

  13. Extra Slides

  14. Distribution Moore NFW • Different profiles  different inner behavior • Moore ρ ~ 1/r1.5 • NFW 1/r1.0 • Kravtsov 1/r0.4 Kravtsov

  15. Integral over redshift. The spectrum of neutrinos depends on the redshift n2

  16. Theoretical flux calculations – Analysis Methods • Line of sight integral – angular radius ψ • Average over a cone of half-angle ψ • Note: This was done by Yüksel, Horiuchi, Beacom, and Ando to modify our neutrino bound for the Milky Way

  17. Atmospheric Neutrino Background • AMANDA and SK data support the non-existence of a signal from DM annih. Ashie, et al (Super-K) PRD 71, 112005 (2005), Fully-contained events Munich (AMANDA), astro-ph/0509330

  18. J dependence on profile • YHBA figure Moore NFW Kravtsov

  19. Background subtraction • J delta’s minus specific J(psi) • HESS • INTEGRAL

More Related