1 / 26

North Mason School District 2009-2010 Academic Performance and Improvement Plan

In the 2009-2010 academic year, North Mason School District showed significant achievements in reading, writing, mathematics, and science. 4th and 5th grade reading scores surpassed statewide averages, and 7th grade reading proficiency jumped by 45%. However, challenges remain in math and science curricula, highlighting the need for continuous improvements despite implementation dips. The district is dedicated to addressing these issues, enhancing literacy programs, and ensuring compliance with Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements, while fostering a culture of collaboration and effective leadership for lasting success.

africa
Télécharger la présentation

North Mason School District 2009-2010 Academic Performance and Improvement Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MSP/ HSPE and AYP Results – 2009-2010 North Mason School District September 2, 2010

  2. Improvement & Growth– Reading & Writing • District 4th and 5th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores. • District 4th grade Writing scores are also above the statewide scores. • District 7th grade Reading proficiency rates increased 45% over last year, compared to statewide increase of 7%.

  3. Improvement & Growths – Mathematics & Science • 7th grade Math proficiency rates increased by 24% over last year, compared to a statewide increase of 8% • 10th grade Science proficiency rates increased by 46% over last year, compared to a statewide increase of 14%

  4. Areas of Concern • Math & Science • New Math Curriculum • “Implementation dip” • Science Curriculum Review • Reading • Inconsistently delivered Literacy • Program

  5. The Scores… Reading

  6. The Scores… Math

  7. The Scores… Writing

  8. The Scores… Science

  9. WASL/ MSP/ HSPE Comparison • New Tests • New Standards • New Format • Hard to compare • Can compare how we tracked with the state results.

  10. State Trend Comparison WR 10

  11. 10th Grade Writing Students by Level No Score Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

  12. State Trend Comparison SC 10

  13. 10th Grade Science Students by Level No Score Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

  14. State Trend Comparison RD 7

  15. 7thGrade Reading Students by Level No Score Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

  16. State Trend Comparison RD 4

  17. 4thGrade Reading Students by Level No Score Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

  18. State Trend Comparison WR 4

  19. 4thGrade Writing Students by Level No Score Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

  20. The Data • Are simply not acceptable • Teams from all schools attended • Leadership Team Retreat and demonstrated commitment to focus on activities that get results. • Administrative support from the Leadership Academy will help us with the hard work ahead.

  21. Other Data to Consider • MAP Reports • Given in 42 states to 2.5 million students • NMSD in Grades 2 – 8 Reading and Math • Growth beyond the National Average • BERC Evaluations • Identify research-based critical elements of effective teaching and learning (PTL) • 60% Alignment in NMSD Classrooms • Recommendations (Thinking, Application & Relationships)

  22. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • Requirements: • Percentage Proficient requirement for Reading & Math • 95% Test Participation Rate • 9 Groups are disaggregated = 37 categories • One missed cell means school/ district does not make AYP • 100% proficient by 2014

  23. AYP Cells

  24. School Improvement • What is it? • Sanctions for districts and schools receiving Federal Title I dollars. • Who is in it? • District – Year 2 • Belfair ES – Year 2 • Sand Hill – Year 3 Secondary schools in NMSD do not receive Title I

  25. Our Work • We Know enough and we Know better. • We must respond to the brutal facts with optimism and action. • We know from Results NOW, by Mike Schmoker, that - • Regular, purposeful collaboration • Closing the “Knowing-Doing Gap”

  26. We know about the Importance of Leadership that . . . • Provides a clear vision, and • Equips and supports teams • Ensures Guaranteed & Viable Curriculum • Monitors PLC’s & Instruction for results

More Related