1 / 43

PURE – India Overview

PURE – India Overview. Dubai – Jan 2006. PURE-India: Investigators and sites. Chandigarh Prof. Rajesh Kumar. Jaipur : Prof. Rajeev Gupta. Bangalore Mario Vaz Anura V Kurpad. Chennai Prof V Mohan. Trivandrum Prof. Soman. TIME LINE OF PURE-India. Dec2005 ~ 22,000. Dec 2002 ~5000

africa
Télécharger la présentation

PURE – India Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PURE – IndiaOverview Dubai – Jan 2006

  2. PURE-India: Investigators and sites Chandigarh Prof. Rajesh Kumar Jaipur: Prof. Rajeev Gupta Bangalore Mario Vaz Anura V Kurpad Chennai Prof V Mohan Trivandrum Prof. Soman

  3. TIME LINE OF PURE-India Dec2005 ~ 22,000 Dec 2002 ~5000 Other centres start data Dec 2001 ~ 2500 subjects Jan 2001 Data starts-B’lore PURE-India Mtg Identification of Other centres (3) July 2000 Conceptualisation Chandigarh As 5th centre

  4. Recruitment Status – PURE India Centers

  5. PURE – INDIA Recruitment Status

  6. The PURE-India Study is carried out in states with very diverse characteristics s N

  7. Present analysis: numbers

  8. The PURE-India Study is carried out in states with very diverse characteristics

  9. Household income (Rs/month) by location ~ $ 235 ~ $ 45

  10. Education level below high school (%): Urban-Rural - males

  11. Education level below high school (%): Urban-Rural - females

  12. TV ownership (%) by location

  13. 2-wheeler ownership (%) by location

  14. Kitchen mixer ownership (%) by location

  15. Current tobacco use (%): Urban-Rural - males

  16. Current tobacco use (%): Urban-Rural - females

  17. Current alcohol use (%): Urban-Rural - males

  18. % of males who are sedentaryby location

  19. % of females who are sedentaryby location

  20. Daily dietary intakes in urban and rural populations: Bangalore centre

  21. % of males who are overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25)by location

  22. % females who are overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25)by location

  23. Mean Waist-hip ratio: Males by location

  24. Mean Waist-hip ratio: Femalesby location

  25. Serum total cholesterol (mg/dl): Males - by location

  26. Serum total cholesterol (mg/dl): Females - by location

  27. Prevalence of hypertension (%): Males - by location

  28. Prevalence of hypertension (%): Females - by location

  29. Hypertension: known, treated and controlled(%): - by location

  30. Prevalence of diabetes (%):Males - by location

  31. Prevalence of diabetes (%):Females - by location

  32. Prevalence of CHD (%):Males - by location

  33. Prevalence of CHD (%):Females - by location

  34. Daily dietary intakes in urban slums relative to other urban and rural populations a Age and gender adjusted means,

  35. Anthropometric profiles in urban and rural populations a Age and gender adjusted

  36. Prevalence: diabetes and hypertension in urban slums relative to other urban and rural areas

  37. Summary • There is considerable heterogeneity in the variables that we have studied and in disease outcomes, across locations (urban-rural-urban slum), gender and region (centre) • Urban-rural risk transitions generally follow patterns of development. In Kerala, there is evidence of a reversal of the transition with the rural population. • Dietary data needs to analysed in most centres – this when available will help us understand some of the changes that we have observed across centres and locations • Non responder data and issues of response bias are being analysed

  38. CHALLENGES / ISSUES OF THE STUDY • Subjects in rural areas / slums unwilling to participate due to loss of daily wages • Responder burden due to the length of questionnaires • Working men unavailable during the day / particular seasons. • No perceived benefits in some groups slums / urban areas. • Takes 45 mins to enter one subjects data in the data entry system.

  39. % use of wood as cooking fuel by location

  40. % use of LPG (gas) as cooking fuel by location

  41. Mean Waist circ (cm) : Males by location

  42. Mean Waist circ (cm) : Femalesby location

More Related