1 / 20

Computational design of protein function

Computational design of protein function. Loren Looger Hellinga lab. 1. Allowable structures for proteins, DNA, small molecules. Progesterone. 2. Pseudo-geometric potential. electrostatics. H-bonds. sterics. solvation. Pretty much like CHARMM. a ~ 1.1. E. r. Hydrogen bonds, too.

agalia
Télécharger la présentation

Computational design of protein function

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computational design of protein function Loren Looger Hellinga lab

  2. 1. Allowable structures for proteins, DNA, small molecules Progesterone

  3. 2. Pseudo-geometric potential electrostatics H-bonds sterics solvation

  4. Pretty much like CHARMM... a ~ 1.1 E r

  5. Hydrogen bonds, too... anchor r H A  D  { } -8 · · ·

  6. Area-based solvation energy P P P = polar H = hydrophobic H H H

  7. Electrostatic potential     is a function of atom-type pair & protein environment. Parameterized to fit experimental data.

  8. 3. Algorithm for choosing best structure(s) from all available

  9. Complementary Surface Construction: Protein coordinates Ligand coordinates Poly-alanine PCS Rotational ligand ensemble Docking grid Force field Placed ligand ensemble Fixed ligand ensemble Side-chain rotamers Evolved PCS ensemble Ranked PCS ensemble Experiments Periplasmic Binding Protein (PBP) scaffolds Molten zone Evolving zone Fixed zone

  10. Metabolites 1 F D-lactate & L-lactate Kd = 2 µM x 0.5 1 1 1 0 40 80 serotonin [L-lactate] (µM) F Kd = 6 µM x F 5-fluorouracil Kd = 4 nM x 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 52.5 100 0 [serotonin] (µM) 0 150 300 [5-fluorouracil] (nM) ibuprofen dopamine 1 F F x x Kd = 6 µM Kd = 2 nM 0.5 MTBE 1 F 0 x 50 100 12.5 25 RDX TNT [MTBE] (µM) Kd = 45 nM [TNT] (nM) 0.5 PMPA~soman 0.25 0.5 [PMPA] (µM) 0 Neurotransmitters Drugs Pollutants Explosives Chemical Threats

  11. QSAR Results for binding affinities for L-lactate & TNT Receptors -8 -6 log Kd (obs) -4 -2

  12. QBP 100mM 10 RBP 1 100µM 10 1 0.1 HBP ABP L-lactate designs GBP

  13. QBP 100mM 10 RBP 1 100µM 10 1 0.1 HBP ABP The use of QSARs in the predictions improves the designs: D-lactate GBP

  14. Construction of biological sentinels for chemical threats and pollutants binary modulation expression [inducer]

  15. Unicellular sentinels for chemical threats and pollutants - + - + TNT Ribose Lactate MTBE 5 Fluoro-uracil

  16. Dose Response of TNTa Signaling IPTG 0 mM TNT 100 mM 2,4-DNT 100 mM 2,6-DNT 100 mM 10 mM 1 mM 0.1 mM 0.01 mM 0.001 mM [TNT]

  17. Kdlactate Racemic mix D L none none 200µM 3µM 0.8µM 10µM Absorbance 210nm D L Optically pure enantiomers D L Wt Gbp Immobilized receptors L-Lac.G1 D-Lac.G1 Fraction #

  18. Calculation #2 Complementary surface construction (PCS + SCS) geometrical description of essential features in the complementary surface Calculation #1 Initial placement of PCS on scaffold backbone { l, w1, w2, q1, q2, q3 }n Combinatorial search (108 sequence 1012 rotamers) Complementary surface construction (1010-10200 rotamers) Site 1 Site 1 Design scaffold coordinates side-chain rotamer library Site 2 Site 2 +... +... Pairwise of atomic interactions Computational design of ligand-binding sitesStrategy #2: predefined geometries

  19. Triose phosphate isomerase chemistry

  20. Acknowledgements • Mary Dwyer • Jeff Smith • Shahir Rizk

More Related