1 / 23

Chile Observatories Earthquake Readiness Workshop

Chile Observatories Earthquake Readiness Workshop. La Serena, Chile • December 3-4 2007. Why Retrofit an Existing Observatory. Change in Code Requirements Change in Facility Requirements Seismic Performance Requirements Earthquake Damage.

aglaia
Télécharger la présentation

Chile Observatories Earthquake Readiness Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chile Observatories Earthquake Readiness Workshop La Serena, Chile • December 3-4 2007

  2. Why Retrofit an Existing Observatory • Change in Code Requirements • Change in Facility Requirements • Seismic Performance Requirements • Earthquake Damage

  3. Existing Building Seismic Performance Objectives • Building codes are designed for Life Safety and not meant to withstand an Earthquake • An Observatory is designed to protect the Telescope and Instruments • What performance objectives was your Observatory designed to?

  4. Seismic Retrofit Performance Objectives • Immediate Occupancy: Minor damage and functionality remains. Damage is easily and rapidly repaired • Damage Control: Damage is localized reducing the cost of recovery • Observations resume within 24-hours after an Earthquake? • One of a kind, critical equipment that has a long lead time to replace must sustain only minor damage

  5. Seismic Retrofit Process • Preliminary Study; How vulnerable is the Observatory and Support Facilities? • Identify the structural characteristics of the building • Site seismic hazard analysis • Site characteristics • Occupancy requirements • Building seismic performance goals • Rehabilitation method • Prioritize retrofit to budget constraints What does it cost to do nothing?

  6. Seismic Retrofit Publications: ATC-14 • Published 1987 • First attempt at creating a seismic evaluation tool • Catalog of weak links • Historic performance data and observations • Analysis based on ductility of elements

  7. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 178 • Published 1992 • Addition of nationwide consensus methodology (NEHRP strength design) • Development of checklists • Consensus process as a guideline

  8. Additional Performance Based Procedures • “FEMA 74: Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage, A Practical Guide, September 1994 • “FEMA 156 and 157: Typical Costs for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings”, December 1994 • “FEMA 276: Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitations of Buildings: Example Applications”, April 1999 • “FEMA 154: Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards, July 2005

  9. Nonstructural Earthquake Damage: (FEMA 74) • Nonstructural: Everything in a building except for columns, floors, beams, etc. • Building Utility Systems • Architectural Components • Furniture and Contents

  10. Earthquake Damage and Upgrade Details (FEMA 74) • Diesel Fuel Tank

  11. Earthquake Damage and Upgrade Details (FEMA 74) • HVAC Equipment

  12. Earthquake Damage and Upgrade Details (FEMA 74) • Built-in Partial Height Partition

  13. Earthquake Damage and Upgrade Details (FEMA 74) • Suspended T-Bar Ceilings

  14. Earthquake Damage and Upgrade Details (FEMA 74) • Large Computers and Access Floors

  15. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356 • Published 2000 • Result of joint ASCE/FEMA effort • Performance-based methodology • Multiple performance and seismicity levels • Expanded commentary

  16. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356

  17. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356

  18. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356

  19. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356

  20. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356

  21. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356

  22. Seismic Retrofit Publications: FEMA 356

  23. Conclusions • State-of-the-practice seismic standards and procedures that are: • Founded in the latest engineering principles • Generally applicable to all buildings • Complete and consistent • Written in mandatory code language • Validated through extensive research, testing and the consensus process

More Related