1 / 14

Elements for the second Assessment of transboundary waters in South-Eastern Europe

This article discusses the legal, policy, and institutional frameworks, monitoring, main problems and responses, and the way forward for transboundary water management in South-Eastern Europe.

ahebert
Télécharger la présentation

Elements for the second Assessment of transboundary waters in South-Eastern Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Elements for the second Assessment of transboundary waters in South-Eastern Europe Tenth Meeting of the Working Group on Monitoring and Assessment, Bratislava 10-11 June 2009 Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  2. Basis • International Workshop on Transboundary Water Resources Management in South-Eastern Europe (Sarajevo, 18-20 May) • Jointly organized with RCC, Sava Commission and GWP-Med Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  3. Sarajevo workshop • General part on cross-cutting issues • Specific part on the second assessment: work in groups of riparian countries Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  4. SEE assessment of transboundary waters • Sub-regional summary (according to agreed outline): highlighting specificities of the region • Fact and figures on transboundary waters based on the datasheets • A number of Ramsar sites included/assessed Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  5. Elements of the sub-regional summary • Current draft (inf.2) based on Sarajevo workshop • To do: • Correct innacuracies • Enrich (more issues highlighted) • Specify (more examples both positive and negative) • Political message (the way forward) • Complement with datasheets • Agree on process until MOP5 Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  6. 1. Legal, policy and institutional frameworks - challenges • Obstacle: conflicting water uses • Differing institutional and legal frameworks and interests • Water cooperation not always high in the political agenda • Difficult political relationships in certain areas Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  7. 1. Legal, policy and institutional frameworks - advantages • Progress in several basins – but slow • Many supportive actors • EU Stabilisation and Association as well as the EU Accession • Ratification of Water Convention • Complementarity Water Convention/EU WFD … but different levels of advancement Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  8. 2. Monitoring • Weakness of national monitoring systems • Transboundary level: lack of information exchange, information non-harmonized, joint M&A almost non-existing • Few positive examples Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  9. 3. Main problems, impact and status • Water pollution from industrial facilities, mines, urban wastewater and agriculture, groundwater pollution, water scarcity and destructive floods (not detailed enough) • Climate change impacts • Development plans, competing uses/demands • Vulnerability of karst aquifer systems Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  10. 4. Responses • Reform of the water sector • Efforts towards IWRM and EU WFD implementation (but not enough at the transboundary level) • International projects Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  11. 5. Way forward • Potential to share benefits but not underpinned by appropriate cooperation • Strengthen cooperation (at the legal and institutional levels) • Improve understanding of climate change impacts and prepare adaptation • Reduce and prevent pollution • Protect aquifers (in particular karstic) • Strengthen political will and clear roadmap to improve cooperation • Not only rely on international projects Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  12. Where are we with datasheets? • Only Greece, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia have clearly nominated involved experts • No preliminary datasheet received Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  13. Annexes • Annex 1 Inventory • Based on first assessment: is it correct? • Are those the transboundary waters to be assessed (tributaries?) • Annex 2 Inventory of legal and institutional frameworks for cooperation: to be based on datasheets Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

  14. Finalization by MOP 5 • 26 June: submission of datasheets and comments to the sub-regional summary (work with riparian countries, work with UNECE secretariat and GWP-Med) • 31 July: finalization of the assessment (summary, facts and figures) GWP • August: work in the secretariat to finalize, edit and format documents for submission to the MOP • [End of August-beginning of September: two weeks for comments by SEE countries.] • 21 September: Finalization of documents for MOP • 10-12 November: discussion and endorsement at MOP5 Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

More Related