1 / 35

Coaching: The Art and Science

Coaching: The Art and Science. Hard work will overcome talent, especially if talent hardly works!. Ethical Decision-Making. Problem-Solving Apply a formal decision making process Solve a complex situation Valuing Differentiate between ethical and legal issues

ailsa
Télécharger la présentation

Coaching: The Art and Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coaching: The Art and Science Hard work will overcome talent, especially if talent hardly works!

  2. Ethical Decision-Making • Problem-Solving • Apply a formal decision making process • Solve a complex situation • Valuing • Differentiate between ethical and legal issues • Understand rationale for Code of Ethics and basis of values • Appreciate hierarchy of values in moral dilemma

  3. Ethical Decision-Making • Critical Thinking • Evaluate options for decisions and actions • Appreciate the influence of the Ethical Codes in decision making • Leadership • Make decisions that influence others • Assume responsibility for decisions and consequences • Interaction • Exchange of ideas and opinions • Explain rationale for decision

  4. Making Ethical Decisions • Wide range of situations • Touch on sensitive issues • Ethical issues when values compromised • Decisions sensitive and difficult • Understanding of facts • Awareness of values • Appropriate points of reference • Application of rigorous decision-making framework • What would you do? • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZmxirK9hWY

  5. Is it a Legal Situation? • Page 24 – 10.2.4 • Page 3-5 Reference Material • Criminal or quasi-criminal actions • Breach of Contract • Grounds child in need of protection • Discriminatory actions • Harassment • Negligence

  6. Actions in Legal Situations • Reporting to police • Reporting to child protection authorities • Reporting to employer or organization

  7. Dealing with an Ethical Situation • Workbook page 4 Read Over • The Shakespearean Dilemma • To Play Or Not To Play • What are the facts of the situation? • Use worksheet 1 at end of chapter – page 19

  8. Athlete is 13 years old Symptoms of injury Everyone agrees injury symptoms present Parents demand child take part – OK with GP No note from GP Research indicates long term consequences No medical examination Good athlete – provincial team Parents powerful in club Coach has final authority (policy) Documentation required to return from injury Athlete feels pain but prepared to play Provincial team coach present Ethical Situation – The Facts

  9. Ethical Issues (pg 6 Reference manual) • Health of the Athlete – long and short term • Reasonable doubt athlete injured • Respect policies and procedures of organization • Return policy in place • Responsibility of Coach, Obligations • Has authority to make decision • Appropriate use of power • Coach by organization, parents over child • Individual Goals • Appropriate use of information

  10. Ethical Decision Making Process • Establish the facts of the situation. • Determine what are the issues – legal implications? • Identify Potential Decisions/Actions. • Identify Pros and Cons of Decisions/Actions. • Select the Best Option. • Implement Decision • – Manage Consequences.

  11. Analysis And Decision - Making Process For Situations That Have Moral Implications Decision - Making 1 - Establish the - Is this a si tuation that has legal facts in the implications? situation - If the situation is not legal, what ethical issues might be involved? 2 - From the facts, determine what is at stake Have all 3 - Consider potential options for action or the facts been decision, and the identified? Analysis consequences of each How does each option promote a fair decision in relation to the: 4 - Assess the pros - - outcomes or and cons of each res ults option - - means used to achieve results - 5 - Select the best - Have I thought about option for decision factors that might influence me? - What values must be preserved in the situ ation? - Is this a just and reasonable decision? 6 - Implement the decision and manage the Implementation consequences What is the best course of action to follow? Who should be involved?

  12. Options for Decision or Actions • “What could I do in this situation?” • Identify the extremes of a continuum of options • Begin with “Make no decision/Take no action” • Coach makes no intervention • Parents proceed with registration of child for competition • Coach allows the athlete to compete • Coach does not allow the athlete to compete

  13. What Might Happen? • Coach makes no intervention –lets parents proceed with registration of child • Athlete competes and has chance to be selected • Risk of more damage to the body • Parents, not coach making decision • Coach abdicates responsibility of making decision • Conflict with parents likely avoided

  14. What Might Happen? • Coach decides to allow athlete to compete • Athlete competes and has chance to be selected • Risk of more damage to the body • Coach assumes authority and responsibility of making decision • Conflict with parents likely avoided • Breach of club policy?

  15. What Might Happen? • Coach decides not to allow athlete to compete • Athlete does not compete and chance to be selected may be compromised • Risk of more damage to the body is negated • Coach assumes authority and responsibility of making decision • Conflict with parents is likely • Provincial team coach may have come for nothing

  16. Assessing Pros and Cons for Decision or Action • Passing judgment on merit of each option • Points of reference needed • Values i.e. deep held beliefs • Core coaching values in • NCCP Code of Ethics • Fair Play Philosophy • Canadian Professional Coaches Association Statement of Values

  17. Assessing Pros and ConsOutcome Criteria • 1. Promotes positive outcome for majority • 2. Minimizes negative implications • 3. Potential negatives affect fewest people • 4. No risk for physical , intellectual, emotional, social development of person • 5. Does not represent obstacle to goal achievement • 6. Protects interests of vulnerable

  18. Assessing Pros and ConsMeans Criteria Worksheet 2 pg. 15 Workbook • 1. Fair and protects rights • 2. Consistent with established rules and principles • 3. Consistent with past actions • 4. Respects authority of people • 5. Based on credible information

  19. NCCP Code of Ethics Physical safety and health of athletes Coaching Responsibility Maintaining Integrity in Relations with others Respect for Athletes Honouring Sport Fair Play Principles Respect Rules of the game Respect Officials and accept their decisions Respect the Opponent Equal opportunities Maintain Dignity Values

  20. Selecting the Best Option Workbook pg. 6 - 2.1.4

  21. Selecting the Best Option Workbook pg. 6 - 2.1.4

  22. Impact on Coach’s Job • Athlete’s parents do performance appraisal of coach • Negative evaluation could terminate contract • Make promotion problematic in sport organization

  23. Development of Coach’s Career • Similar to “Coach’s job” • Provincial coach frustrated for non productive trip and could provide obstacles for opportunities within the sport

  24. Coach’s Reputation • Yes, regardless of decision • Athlete not authorized to compete: • Coach perceived as someone who acts according to convictions • Cares about well being of athlete • Athlete authorized to compete: • Vice versa to not authorized • Influenced by pressure or power groups

  25. Effect on Finances • Probably not

  26. Undermine Personal Relations • If athlete not authorized to compete • Conflict between parents and coach • Comfort level between coach and provincial team coach • Athlete frustration if not selected to provincial team

  27. Immediate decision • Must be made within the hour

  28. Detrimental to Delay • Yes; • If athlete authorized to play possibility injury could get worse

  29. Question Social Conventions • Organization has policy regarding authority of the coach • Parents have legal responsibility of their child • Coach does not allow athlete to compete, goes against wishes of parents

  30. Professional or Social Standards • Yes • Coach has moral obligations to make decisions in the best interests of the athlete (i.e. NCCP Code of Ethics, CPCA Statement of Values, Fair Play Principles) • Do No Harm Principle! Pg. 15 Reference Manual

  31. Your Decision? • Why it is the best decision? • Give rationale

  32. Action Plan – Implementing the Decision • Workbook page 18 • Who needs to know? • What may happen? • Ability to deal on your own? • Plan B – what next if resolution doesn’t work

  33. NCCP Core Competencies • Problem-Solving • Apply a formal decision making process • Solve a complex situation • Valuing • Differentiate between ethical and legal issues • Understand rationale for Code of Ethics and basis of values • Appreciate hierarchy of values in moral dilemma

  34. NCCP Core Competencies • Critical Thinking • Evaluate options for decisions and actions • Appreciate the influence of the Ethical Codes in decision making • Leadership • Make decisions that influence others • Assume responsibility for decisions and consequences • Interaction • Exchange of ideas and opinions • Explain rationale for decision

More Related