1 / 18

*The Institute for Social Science Research ( ISSR )

Meta Data Standards for Managing and Archiving Longitudinal Data: Achieving Best Practice Melanie Spallek*, Michele Haynes* & Mark Western* presented by Steven McEachern. *The Institute for Social Science Research ( ISSR ). ASSDA – Queensland node. Brisbane.

akasma
Télécharger la présentation

*The Institute for Social Science Research ( ISSR )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Meta Data Standards for Managing and Archiving Longitudinal Data: Achieving Best Practice Melanie Spallek*, Michele Haynes* & Mark Western*presented by Steven McEachern *The Institute for Social Science Research (ISSR)

  2. ASSDA – Queensland node Brisbane Institute of Social Science Research at the University of Queensland

  3. WHY • Cross-sectional and longitudinal data structure is different • Current meta data standards not sufficient • Great need for international standard in best practice for archiving longitudinal data

  4. Overview • Cross-sectional studies versus longitudinal studies >different types of longitudinal studies • Major longitudinal studies archived with ASSDA • Challenges with documenting longitudinal studies • Compare meta data standards internationally • Future plans at ASSDA

  5. Cross- sectional Longitudinal Repeated observations over time Two or more dimensional Change over time, cause-effect, shifting attitudes • Multiple variables observed at a single point in time • One- dimensional

  6. Different types of longitudinal studies • Repeated cross-sectional studies > new sample at different points in time > represents snapshot of population at each time point > aspect of individual’s change not available • Cohort studies > group of individuals at a similar state in the life course, studied over time > problems with drop-outs • Household panels >Household as a study unit > Number of individuals can vary (move in, move out)

  7. Major longitudinal studies archived with ASSDA • Negotiating the Life Course (NLC) > 1500 participants at wave 1 in 1996 > five waves archived so far • Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) > three cohorts (younger, mid-aged, older) > 40,000 participants at wave 1 in 1996 > four waves archived for the younger and older cohorts and five for the mid-aged cohort

  8. Australian Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ALSA)> 2,087 participants at wave 1 in 1992 > seven waves archived so far • Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth (LSAY) > 13,613 participants at wave one in 1995 > all four waves have been archived • Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Australia (LSIA) >Phase 1 (three waves) and Phase 2 (two waves) have been archived Professor Mary Luszcz with the oldest ALSA participant who is 108 years old.

  9. Meta data standards used at ASSDA • DDI2 is used for describing cross-sec and longitudinal data • coverage of DDI2 is focused on single studies, single data files, simple surveys and aggregated data files • metadata requirements for longitudinal studies differ from that of cross-sectional studies and also across types of longitudinal studies • DDI3.1 supports the description of longitudinal data, but few archives have facilitated DDI3.1 yet

  10. Challenges • Combining Data on Same Individuals from Repeated Surveys • How do longitudinal studies name comparable variables at different surveys? • What tools are in place to easily identify variables and their comparability? • What makes a variable incomparable?

  11. Incomparability Survey 1: Marriage improves your health Agree Disagree Survey 2: Marriage improves your health Strongly Agree StronglyDisagree

  12. Challenges • Combining data on same individuals from repeated surveys • How do longitudinal studies name comparable variables at different surveys? • What tools are in place to easily identify variables and their comparability? • What makes a variable incomparable? • Updating longitudinal surveys

  13. Updating Longitudinal Surveys • Additional logic check within a study participant between surveys across time • S1 S2 S3 • S1 Osteoporosis S2 Osteoporosis S3 Osteoporosis

  14. Comparisons among International Archives • UK Data Archive’s Survey Question Bank http://surveynet.ac.uk/sqb/introduction.asp • CentERdata uses some DDI3.1 http://www.lissdata.nl/dataarchive/concepts • Other archives have not been found to address issues relating meta data for longitudinal data archiving

  15. Future Plans at ASSDA • Website for longitudinal data archiving • Provide guidelines for data dictionary and • variable map development • Require data dictionary and variable map • with deposit of longitudinal data

  16. Website/ Contact Australian Social Science Data Archive18 Balmain CrescentThe Australian National UniversityACTON ACT 0200 Email: assda@anu.edu.au, m.spallek@uq.edu.au Website: www.assda.edu.auPhone: +61 2 6125 4400 Fax: +61 2 6125 0627

More Related