1 / 26

PUBLIC DEBT and the EU Objectives

PUBLIC DEBT and the EU Objectives. By the end of this lecture students should: Be aware of the significance of the intertemporal budget constraint Understand why and how a country can stabilise it’s debt Be able to apply the above to monetary union in the EU REF: Eufiscalteach nov09

akiko
Télécharger la présentation

PUBLIC DEBT and the EU Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PUBLIC DEBT and the EUObjectives By the end of this lecture students should: • Be aware of the significance of the intertemporal budget constraint • Understand why and how a country can stabilise it’s debt • Be able to apply the above to monetary union in the EU REF: Eufiscalteach nov09 Incl formulae

  2. PUBLIC DEBT and the EU Section 1

  3. What is the government deficit? • Assumptions • Ms constant • lump sum tax autonomous • Government debt (D) (1) D = D-1 + rD-1 + G - T where: D-1 = Govt. debt at the end of the previous period rD-1 = interest paid on this debt G = Govt. spending T = Taxes

  4. Thus, budget deficit (BD) = (2) D – D-1 = G + rD-1 - T change in debt = Budget deficit Rearrange D – D-1 = G - T + rD-1 primary deficit debt service

  5. Intertemporal budget constraints Assume • 2 time periods • Yr1 = G1 T1 • Yr2 = G2 T2 • No initial debt • If G1 > T1 • Yr2 must cover G2 + debt service • T2 = G2+(G1 - T1) (1+r)

  6. PUBLIC DEBT and the EU Section 2

  7. DEBT STABILISATION • 1960’s - expanding debt no concern • 1970’s - explosive increase in debt • Debt stabilisation central to fiscal policy • See handout for EU data

  8. GOVERNMENT SOLVENCY • Real debt burden (ie;ratio of govt. debt to GDP) doesn’t grow without limit • Adjustment of primary budget balance required • total deficit = primary deficit + debt service D = G - T + rD-1 primary deficit debt service • Even if G=T for a year, debt rises (debt service) • Debt can be EXPLOSIVE! • Primary surplus may be required

  9. DEBT STABILISATION • Explosive if r > g debt accumulates faster than GDP grows (as 1970’s +) • If r < g ratio debt to GDP can be stabilised with budget deficit

  10. Now consider in relation to GDP • D = G - T + (r-g) D-1 Y Y Y • g= growth rate of econ • r= r% on debt • Debt Explosive if r > g

  11. p18 • Primary surplus required to stabilise total debt to GDP ratio ie: D = 0 Y when T-G = (r-g) D-1 Y Y primary budget surplusdebt service • Examples-see worksheet

  12. PUBLIC DEBT & INFLATION • Central bank can now monetise the debt • Seigniorage • No debt service - breaks link making debt explosive • Inflation tax • Introduce seigniorage into formula

  13. Now, smaller primary budget surplus required for stabilisation • Explosive nature of debt transferred to INFLATION eg. Brazil, Russia

  14. PUBLIC DEBT and the EU Section 3

  15. HOW TO STABILISE PUBLIC DEBT • DEFAULT Extreme • SEIGNIORAGE & INFLATION TAX Reduces value of M0 Reduces value of public debt • REDUCE DEFICIT

  16. REDUCE DEFICIT • Raise tax / cut Govt. expenditure • Politically/economically difficult Coalitions German unification dependency ratio tax problems eg. Distortions, ‘deadweight’ loss • Success?

  17. UK ‘NEW FISCAL FRAMEWORK’ • Deficit reduction plan • Transparency • Account for economic cycle • Two rules Golden Rule over cycle Public debt - ‘stable & prudent’ level • Adopted by EU?

  18. EU EXPERIENCE • Maastricht criteria • Stability & growth pact • Rationale • fiscal discipline - debt is ‘explosive’ • risk of ‘fiscal externalities’ • danger ECB monetising debt • See handout that links these arguments to earlier theory

  19. Euro area; Budget deficit deficit (-)/surplus (+) Selected countries (as a percentage of GDP) Source: Adapted from ECB Monthly Bulletin Nov 2007 & ECB Statistics Pocket book Oct 2009

  20. Euro area; Government debt (as a percentage of GDP) Source: ECB Statistics Pocket book Oct 2009

  21. SGP problems • Loss of ER & monetary policy - fiscal policy is only policy left to States • OCA analysis suggests centralised budget - not possible • Thus, fiscal policy must be flexible to deal with negative shocks • it is not under SGP • State budgets not automatic stabilisers in recession (national fiscal policy constrained)

  22. SGP problems • Can rules be enforced? • action against ‘offenders’ requires 2/3 maj in Council • Evidence suggests more flexibility would be ok • evidence (DE Grauwe) that States in monetary unions have lower budget deficits that individual States • risk of default in EU low (10yr bond yields have converged on German rates)

  23. SGP problems • France & Germany 2003/04 • SGP effectively suspended • 2004-08? • Future?

  24. SGP problems • Greece 2009

  25. CONCLUSION • Debt stabilisation central to fiscal policy • Debt can be explosive • Primary budget surplus important • Stability & Growth Pact • does it constrain national fiscal policy in EU? • will it stop fiscal externalities in EU?

  26. ADDITIONAL READING • Reading list, plus • Gros & Thygesen, ch8 • De Grauwe ch9 • Bohn H, ‘The Behaviour of US Public Debt and Deficits’, Quarterly Jnl of Economics, Aug 1998 • Weale M, ‘Monetary and Fiscal Policy in Euroland’, Jnl of Common Market Studies, March 1999 • Balsssone & Franco,’Public Investment, the Stability Pact and the ‘Golden rule’, Fiscal Studies (2000), vol. 21 • Buti, Franco & Ongena,’Fiscal Discipline and Flexibility in EMU: The Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact, Oxford Economic Review, vol.14, no.3

More Related