1 / 40

Corrections

Corrections. Carrying out the sentence of the decreed by the judicial system History of Corrections Community Corrections Intermediate Sanctions Institutional Corrections . Colonial America (1600s-1750s). Punishment was public Punishment was corporal or capital

alaula
Télécharger la présentation

Corrections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Corrections • Carrying out the sentence of the decreed by the judicial system • History of Corrections • Community Corrections • Intermediate Sanctions • Institutional Corrections

  2. Colonial America (1600s-1750s) • Punishment was public • Punishment was corporal or capital • Prison-like institutions existed, but were not used as “punishment”

  3. COPORAL PUNISHMENTS

  4. The Rise of the Penitentiary (1750-1800) • William Penn • Revised criminal code in Pennsylvania to forbid torture and mutilation; ordered new “houses of correction” • Walnut Street Prison (1790) • Other states (New Jersey, New York) followed

  5. Walnut Street Jail and Eastern Penitentiary

  6. Pennsylvania vs. Auburn System • Pennsylvania • Western Penitentiary, Eastern Penitentiary • Silent System • New York • Auburn Prison • Congregate System • Only difference? • Isolation of inmates during the day

  7. Corrections in the 1800s • Auburn System wins debate • Easier to perform labor; the only way to perform factory labor • But, prison brutal, corporal punishment prevalent • Prison building boom (1850s) • Prison Industry • Contract system, convict-lease, state account

  8. The Progressive Era (early 1900s) to the 1960s • The Progressives attacked many social ills (working conditions, poverty….) • In Criminal Justice • Rehabilitation (not punishment, penance) should be the goal of corrections • Psychology/Sociology “Causes” • Platform of indeterminate sentences, probation, parole…

  9. Corrections from 1970 to present • 1960s-1970 • Faith in rehabilitation crushed • Liberals = justice model, Conservatives = punish • 1970s = deterrence • 1980s-2000s: deterrence/incapacitation • Return to determinate sentencing • 3 strikes legislation, mandatory minimums, harsh sentencing guidelines… • Chain gangs, “strip-down” prisons • Currently: Evidence based corrections?

  10. Conscience and Convenience • Why were the first prison built? • Revulsion of Gallows  “Penitentiaries” • Then, “Correctional Facilities” • Why do we still build prisons if we no longer believe in rehabilitation? • Incapacitation as the “default” goal of prisons….or “convenience”

  11. The Corrections Continuum • Probation • Intermediate Sanctions • Jails • Prisons

  12. Probation • Father of Probation is John Augustus • Formally adopted in progressive era • Suspend sentence, in return, offender abides by “conditions of probation” • Conditions set and enforced by judicial system • Offenders who “fail” may have probation revoked, and original sentence imposed

  13. Functions of Probation Departments • Pre-sentence Investigation (PSI) • Interview offender, case history, tied to rehabilitation • Includes recommendation for sentence • Supervision of Offenders • Counseling, meet with offenders • Help with job, broker community resources • Supervise (house visits, drug testing)

  14. Use of Probation • 65% (almost 2/3) of the total corrections population is on probation • Roughly 4.2 million offenders are on probation • Average Caseload = 120 • Goal has shifted • Rehabilitation (1920-60s) to supervision/zero tolerance (1980s-1990s) to “balanced” (?)

  15. Parole • Parole as release from prison • Discretionary release • Parole board = appointed by governor • Related to rehabilitation and intermediate sentences • Parole as supervision • Similar to probation supervision • Early release a privilege, therefore must follow conditions of release • Many states abolished parole release in 1980s, but now retain supervision • “Post-custody supervision” or “Community Control”

  16. How “effective” are probation and parole supervision? • Cost savings • Probation and parole are much less expensive than prison • Recidivism • Large differences in “recidivism” across jurisdictions • For felons on probation, as high as 65% (California felons), as low as 17% get arrested within 3 years • Depends upon “risk” of clients • Failure rates higher for parolees • 40% return to prison within 3 years, arrest rates much higher

  17. Intermediate Sanctions Probation Prison Death ISP EM Boot Camp

  18. WHY do these critters exist? • Prison crowding in 1980s • Probation viewed as failure • Need for “continuum” of sanctions

  19. What is the goal of these critters? • Divert offenders from prison (save money) • Reduce recidivism (through deterrence) • Provide an option to judges that fits between prison and probation

  20. Intensive Probation or Parole Supervision (IPS) • Idea is to “soup up” traditional supervision • Reduce Caseloads (15 to 40 offenders) • Daily contact with offender • Routine drug testing • Curfews, home and employment visits

  21. Do ISP’s work? • Do ISP’s divert from prison? • NO, judges are reluctant to send “prison-bound” offenders to ISP (Net Widening) • Do ISP’s reduce recidivism? • NO, when compared to similar group of offenders, they actually do worse (fishbowl effect) • Movement over past decade to use ISP as a way to punish probationers, to enforce treatment, or to incorporate effective treatment within the ISP framework

  22. Shock Incarceration (boot camps) • Short, intense incarceration to “shock” the offender into his/her senses • military drill and discipline, physical exercise, hard physical labor • typically reserved for young, non-violent, first-time offenders • short time-span, typically 6 months

  23. Do boot camps work? • Reduce Recidivism? • Overall, boot camp graduates have similar recidivism rates as similar offenders who receive different sanctions • Divert Offenders? • Depends upon where in the system they are diverted • Very small numbers compared to prisons, so not a lot of “diversion”

  24. Home Confinement and Electronic Monitoring • Home confinement is an old practice • Electronic Monitoring is used to enforce home confinement • Technology emerged in the 1980s • Most are bracelets that work like invisible dog fences • Newer GPS devices • Key issue = what is done when violate confinement

  25. Residential Community Corrections • Traditional “Half-way house” • Used to reintegrate prison inmates into society • Now • Traditional functions • Sanction for probation violators • Day reporting centers • Split sentences (probation + RCC time)

  26. How do RCC’s Work? • Typically, they are house-like structures (not prison-like) • Inmates (clients) are usually free to leave during the day (job, classes), and return at night • Progression from little freedom to more freedom • RCC as primary way to provide correctional treatment

  27. IMS and Recidivism • None of these sanctions have demonstrated recidivism reductions. • Why not? All of them are based on the principle of specific deterrence. Example of boot camp--why would this reduce recidivism? • Exception: some incorporate intervention programs grounded in good theory

  28. Institutional Corrections Go to jail, go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200

  29. JAILS • County Level Institutions • Usually run by Sheriff and deputies • House inmates (less than 1 year) and pre-trial detainees • Conditions notoriously poor • Little programming, no medical facilities • Violence, shifting population, suicide rates high

  30. Prisons • Hold individuals sentence to at least 1 year • Operated by the executive branch

  31. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) • 98 Facilities • 126,000 inmates • Most inmates (60%) are serving time for drug offense • Clear product of “War on Drugs” • Prisons ranked on a 1 to 6 scale (1 = FCI in Colorado)

  32. State Prisons • Over 500 prisons, and 1.5 million offenders • Governor typically appoints warden • Organization • Maximum (razor wire, guard towers…) • Medium (similar to max, but less serious offenders) • Minimum (typically campus style)

  33. Since the late 1970s, the total number of inmates in custody has increased dramatically

  34. Why the dramatic increase? • Change in public opinion, and political emphasis • Three strikes laws, “truth in sentencing” • Longer sentences in “guidelines” • Drug Policy • Increase in felony convictions • Factors that do not clearly influence incarceration • Crime rates, Economy

  35. Profile of Prison and Jail Inmates • Racial Profile • 35% White, 44% Black, 11%, Hispanic • 11% of black males in 20s and 30s • Most (98%) are male • Most are poor, with less than a high school education • Majority (60%) have been in prison before

  36. What type of offenders go to prison?

  37. Does (did) incapacitation “work?” • Yes and No • Yes: small to moderate reductions in crime levels for certain offenses (burglary, theft, robbery). • Doubling the prison population (200,000 to 400,000) reduced these crimes by 18% over a decade • But, doubling again, will have less of an effect!! • NO: Little if any effect on murder, rape, simple or aggravated assault…. • Zero effect on drug crimes (replacement) • “Does it work” as wrong question

  38. The Inmate Economy • A black market exists in almost all prisons • Sex, drugs, alcohol, food, better living conditions… • What is the currency of the prison economy?Used to be cigarettes…now stamps… • Why not “stamp out” the prison economy? • Guards are pragmatic • Some guards are part of the economy

  39. Does Rehabilitation Work? • Martinson (1975) “nothing works” • He later recanted his position, and argued that some things do “work,” but nobody listened • Don Andrews (Canadian Psychologist) • Much “rehabilitation” is “correctional quackery” • What works? Evidence-Based Corrections • Cognitive/Behavioral based programs • Intensive intervention with follow-ups

More Related