SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

6.3 Interpretations

alaura avatar
7 diapositives · 212 Views · Aug 22, 2014

This chapter explores the foundational aspects of interpretations in sentential logic, emphasizing the significance of truth semantics prior to constructing truth trees. It introduces the concept of models in quantified logic, detailing the components necessary for assigning truth values and establishing truth conditions. The discussion includes the relationship between truth values, domains, and predicates, while addressing the undecidability challenge in first-order logic. Lastly, it outlines the steps for constructing interpretations from logic trees by analyzing finished and open branches.

6.3 Interpretations - slide 1
01 / 76.3 Interpretations
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

6.3 Interpretations
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. 6.3 Interpretations • In Sentential logic, truth semantics comes first, truth trees later. Good order! • In this chapter, quantified trees come first, the value-assignment semantics comes later. Bad order! • Disadvantage: Undecidability of first-order logic.

  2. Definitions • An interpretationmaking a set of formulas true is a model of the set. • An interpretation M of a set S of formulas of QL is an ordered set < D, [] >, where D is M’s nonempty domain , and [] is a function assigning: • truth values to sentential letters in S • elements of D to constants in S • sets of n-tuples of elements of D to n-ary predicates in S

  3. Two Semantic Components • D: General individual domain for x (not quantifier) to range over. • []: Value-assignment function: • Sentential letter truth value • constant object in D • unitary predicate subset of D • binary predicate subset of pairs in DxD • n-ary predicate subset of n-tuples Dn

  4. Truth Conditions by M • [p]m = T iff p] = T • [Ra1 …an]m=T iff <[a1], …, [an]> is in [R] • [¬A]m = T iff [A]m = F • [(A&B)]m = T iff [A]m=[B]m=T • [(AVB)]m = T iff [A]m=T or [B]m=T • [(A→B)]m = T iff [A]m=F or [B]m=T • [(A↔B)]m = T iff [A]m=[B]m

  5. Truth Conditions for Quantifiers • c-variant M’ of M, just like M but [ ]’may assign different object to c • [uA]m = T iff [Ac/u]m’ = T for some c-variant M’ of M (there is some [a] in D s.t. A(a) = T) • [uA]m = T iff [Ac/u]m’ = T for every c-variant M’ of M (every [a] in D s.t. A(a) = T)

  6. 6.4 Constructing Interpretations from Trees • Consider only a finished, open tree • Consider an open branch including nodes: Fab, Fbb, Ga, ¬Gb, ¬Faa The model M = < D, [ ] > is [F]={<a, b>, <b, b>}, [G]={<a>}, D = {a, b}

  7. Rules • D = {a1, …, an, …}, where a1, an, … are the constants appearing in atomics on the open branch. • [p] = T if p is on the branch; F, otherwise. • [R] = {<a1, …, an>, <b1, …, bn>, …}, where R(a1, …an), R(b1, …,bn), and so on, appear on the branch.