1 / 18

Absence from work A question of attitude? Results from the IPAW * study * Intervention Project on Absence and Well-bein

Absence from work A question of attitude? Results from the IPAW * study * Intervention Project on Absence and Well-being. T. S. Kristensen, L. Smith-Hansen & M. L. Nielsen National Institute of Occupational Health Copenhagen, Denmark. The normal model of absence from work. Work environment.

albert
Télécharger la présentation

Absence from work A question of attitude? Results from the IPAW * study * Intervention Project on Absence and Well-bein

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Absence from workA question of attitude?Results from the IPAW* study* Intervention Project on Absence and Well-being T. S. Kristensen, L. Smith-Hansen & M. L. Nielsen National Institute of Occupational HealthCopenhagen, Denmark

  2. The normal model of absence from work Work environment Non-work environment Sickness Sickness absence

  3. The simple model assumes: • that it is simple to distinguish between good health and sickness • that sickness (automatically) leads to absence from work Both of these assumptions are questionable

  4. When is a person sick? • Two problems: • where should we draw the line? • what about inconsistent patterns?

  5. Perhaps the person’s attitude plays a role when the person decides to have or not to have sickness absence? Attitude Health Absence

  6. How we measured attitude to absence:

  7. How we measured attitude to absence:

  8. How we measured attitude to absence:

  9. How we measured attitude to absence:

  10. How we measured attitude to absence:

  11. How we measured attitude to absence:

  12. How we measured attitude to absence:

  13. Example:You are getting the flue

  14. Results • With regard to absence days the expected pattern is found in 10 out of 14 comparisons (7 items, 2 years). One item shows the opposite pattern: “Children have a day off”. • With regard to absence periods the expected pattern is found in all 14 comparisons. • The average “excess risk” of absence is approx. 10% for absence days and 20% for absence periods among those with positive attitudes to absence.

  15. 1996 1997 Association between absence days and overall attitude to absence Days/year 16.0 16.0 16 14.5 15.2 14 13.4 14.2 12 12.2 11.7 10 8 Very Very negative positive N=1676

  16. 1996 1997 Association between absence periods and overall attitude to absence Periods/year 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.0 2.1 Very Very negative positive N=1676

  17. Conclusions • There is no clear consensus among employees about the issue of sickness and absence. This means that there is an element of choice in absence behaviour, and that attitude plays a role. • Those with a positive attitude to absence have slightly more absence days and clearly more absence periods.

  18. This presentationcan be seen at:www.ami.dk/presentations

More Related