1 / 3

THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM

The California Supreme Court ruled that an employer will be liable for injuries sustained by individuals due to the negligent driving of one of its employees, stating the following:

albert0070
Télécharger la présentation

THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM

  2. THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM The California Supreme Court FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.tutorialoutlet.com The California Supreme Court ruled that an employer will be liable for injuries sustained by individuals due to the negligent driving of one of its employees, stating the following: A person injured by someone driving a car in the course of employment may sue not only the driver but that driver's employer. The employer can be sued on two legal theories based on tort principles: respondeat superior and negligent entrustment. Respondeatsuperior, a form of vicarious liability, makes an employer liable, irrespective of fault, for negligent driving by its employee in the scope of employment. The theory of negligent entrustment makes an employer liable for its own negligence in choosing an employee to drive a vehicle. Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper, written in the third-person voice, that addresses the following: Explore types of principal-agency relationships and determine what type of relationship exists in this case between the driver, Jose Carcamo, and the company, Sugar Transport of the Northwest, LLC. What course of action do you recommend with respect to the lawsuit and Carcamo's employment?

  3. THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT / TUTORIALOUTLET DOT COM Thank you

More Related