380 likes | 610 Vues
Capital budgeting and valuation with leverage. Chapter 18. outline. Focus on constant debt to equity ratio Present WACC valuation method WACC/APV link Project based WACC Levering up and WACC. Capital budgeting procedure. Remember the steps we follow
E N D
outline Focus on constant debt to equity ratio • Present WACC valuation method • WACC/APV link • Project based WACC • Levering up and WACC
Capital budgeting procedure • Remember the steps we follow • Estimate the incremental cash flows generated by the project • Discount the free cash flow based on the project’s cost of capital to determine the NPV • How to estimate the appropriate cost of capital? • How does the financing decision affect the free cash flows and the project’s cost of capital?
Some simplifying assumptions • To lay out the method of valuation we require three simplifying assumptions • The project has average risk (same as the firm’s) • The firm’s debt-to-equity ratio is fixed over time • Corporate taxes are the only imperfection • We will simplify some assumptions later on
The WACC method To calculate project value • Calculate project’s (unlevered) FCFs • see chapter 7 • Discount using WACC • rwacc = E/(E+D) rE + D/(E+D) rD(1-τc) • VL = PV(FCF’s, rwacc)
Using WACC an Example • Example page 577 • Avco, Inc. is a manufacturer of custom packaging products and is considering a new line of packaging (RFX) that includes an embedded radio-frequency identification tag. This improved technology will become absolute after 4 years. In the meanwhile it is expected to increase sales by $60 million per year. Manufacturing costs and operating expenses are expected to be $25 million and $9 million respectively per year.
Using WACC an Example • Example continued • Developing the product will require upfront R&D and marketing expenses of $6.67 million together with an investment of $24 million in equipment. The equipment will be obsolete in four years and will depreciate via straight-line method over that period. Avco bills its customers in advance, and it expects no net working capital requirements for the project. Avco’s tax rate is 40%.
First step: predicting FCF’s • This implies the following steam of expected future cash flows
Calculating WACC • The market risk of RFX is expected to be similar to that for the company’s other lines of business. • We will use WACC to discount the cash flows generated from the project • We need information on the Avco’s capital structure • This can be found in the firm’s balance sheet
Using the APV method when D/E ratio is fixed • See chapter 15 for the case of fixed $D • Alternative method of valuation • First, calculate the unlevered value VU by discounting FCF’s using rU. With constant D/E ratio we can estimate rU by: • Second, calculate the value of the interest tax shield. With constant D/E ratio we discount the tax shield with rate rU • APV: VL = APV = VU + PV(int. tax shield) • rU= (D/(E+D))rD + (E/(D+E))rE
The unlevered value of the project • The RFX project has initial investment of $28 million and 4 annual FCF’s of $18 million • We discount FCF’s using Avco’s unlevered cost of capital (with target leverage ratio)
Financing the project with fixed D/E ratio • The value of leveraged project (in $millions): • To maintain the ratio D/E=1
Finding expected interest payments • Given debt levels (in $millions): • We calculate interest payments and tax shield with tax rate of 40% and interest of 6%
One more example • Example – Avco is considering an acquisition of another firm in the same industry. Expected FCF’s will increase by $3.8 million @ t=1, and will grow at annual rate of 3% from then on. The purchase price is $80 million will be financed with $50 million in new debt initially. Avco maintain a constant D/E ratio for the acquisition.
Project-based cost of capitalhow to find WACC of project? • Up to now we assumed that the project is in the same line of business as the rest of the firm and that it is financed while maintaining the same capital structure • This allowed us to assume that the cost of capital of the project equals the firm’s WACC • Sometimes these assumptions do not apply • Consider GE • GE Commercial Finance, GE Aviation, GE Healthcare, GE Energy, NBC Universal, among others
Project-based cost of capital Comparable firms Firm project rU (comp. firms) = rU (project)
Project-based cost of capital Calculating WACC for project • Identify comparable firms in the same industry of the project (comparable risk) • Calculate average unleveraged cost of capital of comparable firms • Use this as the project’s unleveraged cost of capital • Given debt cost of capital you can calculate the project equity cost of capital • Then, given tax rate and firm’s capital structure you can calculate WACC for the project
Project-based cost of capital Numerical example • Suppose now that Avco launches a new plastics manufacturing division with different market risk than its main packaging business • WACC of Avco is no longer relevant to us • Instead, we estimate the unlevered cost of capital (rU) of other plastic manufacturers • Remember this represents the underlying risk of the firm’s assets before we account for leverage effects
Step one: calculate unlevered cost of capital for comparable firms • You identify two single-division plastics firms that have similar business risk
Step two: calculate equity cost of capital for project • Back to our project • Remember, our project will be financed with debt and equity and therefore we will benefit from the interest tax shield • Suppose Avco maintains its capital structure (equal mix of debt and equity) when adopting the project, and that it will continue to borrow at 6% • Then, Avco’s equity cost of capital is
Step 3: calculate WACC for project • Once we have the equity cost of capital, the debt cost of capital, and marginal tax rate we can compute the project’s WACC
Levering up and WACC • What happens to WACC when the firm increases leverage? Example page 592 • Consider a firm with debt-to-equity ratio of 25%, debt cost of capital of 6.67%, equity cost of capital of 12%, and tax rate of 40% • Its current WACC is,
Levering up and WACC • Example continued • Now suppose that the firm changes its debt-to-equity ratio to 50% • What is wrong with the calculation: rWACC (new) = 0.5 x 12% + 0.5 x 6.67% x (0.6) = 9%
Levering up and WACC • Two things can happen when levering up • First with higher leverage payments to equity holders bear more risk • Second with higher leverage the required rate of return on the firm’s debt by investors might increase • Suppose that now debt holders require 7.34% instead of 6.67% • To recalculate the firm’s WACC lets go back and calculate the firm’s unlevered cost of capital
Assigned problems • Problems page 611-618 • 2, 5,14