1 / 31

Nicolas Reul, Joe Tenerelli IFREMER Vincent Kerbaol, Fabrice Collard

COSMOS-OS campaign Analysis Status. Nicolas Reul, Joe Tenerelli IFREMER Vincent Kerbaol, Fabrice Collard BOOST Technologies, Brest, France Catherine Bouzinac ESA Niels Skou TUD Many Other Folks at ESA, TUD, HUT, IEEC…. SMOS SAG meeting, Villafranca, 2-3/11 2006.

aletha
Télécharger la présentation

Nicolas Reul, Joe Tenerelli IFREMER Vincent Kerbaol, Fabrice Collard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COSMOS-OS campaign Analysis Status Nicolas Reul, Joe Tenerelli IFREMER Vincent Kerbaol, Fabrice Collard BOOST Technologies, Brest, France Catherine Bouzinac ESA Niels Skou TUD Many Other Folks at ESA, TUD, HUT, IEEC… SMOS SAG meeting, Villafranca, 2-3/11 2006

  2. CoSMOS-OS Objectives • Support validation of the SMOS Level 2 prototype processor critical sub models: • Roughness impact corrections • Galactic and sun glint corrections • SSS Inversion methodology using NWP products • Investigate physical sources for observed wiggles in the previously measured Tb azimuthal signals (LOSAC, JPL, ..): • Hypothesis for the wiggles: • rough sea surface scattering of galactic reflections, • signature of spatial heterogeneities in surface roughness (internal wave signatures, mesoscale activity due to wave interaction with current or bathymetry, slicks,..)

  3. Campaign Site: North Sea

  4. O.5 K O.3 K O.5 K Relatively Homogeneous site

  5. Optimal Experiment AreaFree of fixed structures, near oil rig with MIROS wave radar, Ferry Box line

  6. Baseline Flight Plans • Focus on circle flights, performed over an area between Ekofisk and SleipnerA, which exhibits maximally uniform geophysical conditions. Good for galactic and sunglint impact studies. Also, Ekofisk and SleipnerA provides good wave and meteorological information • Make use of the numerous straight-line flight legs from Stavenger to circle flight site to tentatively retrieve the SSS front from averaging procedure • Sun glint flights: several flights dedicated to sunglint during morning • All Flight times were aligned with ENVISAT overpasses.

  7. Equipment and Auxilliary Data

  8. HUT Skyvan Specs • Typical airspeed range 170 - 290 km/h (92 - 160 knots). • Maximum/Cruising speed278 km/h (150 knots). • Max. range: 1200 km, (980 km + 45 min reserve). • Flight max. duration: 4 hours (3h 15 min + 45 min reserve). • Maximum altitude 3000 m standard, 6000 m with oxygen (5500 m recommended) • Max. take off weight 5670 kg. • Payload: 1800 kg (700 kg with full tank). • Max. payload on rear cargo ramp 180 kg. • Max. payload in rear cargo area 450 kg. • Navigation unit for measurement flights: DGPS, 2 m accuracy, independent recording. • GPS/INS Output rate 10hzAccuracy: 1 mrad (attitude), 1.5 mrad (heading).

  9. Aircraft Equipment Layout

  10. EMIRAD-2 (Niels Skou)

  11. Radiometer Footprint at Flight altitude (~3km) 1.5 km Aft-looking 40° antenna Aft-looking 0° antenna

  12. Auxilliary Data & Sources • IR radiometer on aircraft: provided by a non – imaging IR sensor used by the Finnish Institute of Marine Research (FIMR) for airborne sea surface temperature observations. The sensor was installed in the nose radome of the aircraft.=>SST • SleipnerA: MIROS wave radar. (scanning radar providing information on directional distribution of spectrum)+météorological station: wind, waves • Ekofisk: WaMoS radar, vertical radar, waverider buoy. wind, waves • FerryBox System: low-cost opportunity observations on commercial ships. Norwegian Institute for Water Research=> SSS, SST • ENVISAT/ASAR data – flights coordinates with overpasses: o, wind, waves, currents • GPS reflectometry system (PARIS) on aircraft. o, wind, mss • Met data from Norwegian Meteorological Institute (Hirlam, rain radar ) wind, rain • Hycom model daily data (SSS, SST & currents at 5x5 km) • Medspiration analysis (SST) • MERIS & MODIS (Ocean color) • Solar Fluxes at 1.4GHz (NODC)

  13. SSS Data Circle & sunglint flights

  14. SST Data Circle & sunglint flights IR radiometer data still under analysis

  15. ASAR Data Sea surface roughness and wind vector field.A western wind from 5 to 7 m/s (10 to 15 knots) is observed on the circle flight with higher winds coming from the west. The wind is rather calm (less than 4 m/s) between the circle flight area and the coast except within 10 miles from the coast where the wind is locally reaching 5 to 6 m/s. A strong North-Western swell of 310m wavelength is present in the circle flight area. Some signature of oceanic fronts are visible on the sea surface roughness map. From these modulations, the intersection of the main salinity front and the direct route from Stavanger to the circle flight area center is estimated to be about 58deg 17' N 4deg 19' E

  16. + données Hirlam

  17. GNSSR Data :mean square slopes of sea surface

  18. Rain Radar from Metno: 1mes every 1/4 hour

  19. Ocean Color MODIS/MERIS Hycom currents 4km res

  20. Analysis Methods • Calculation of observation geometry for each 3dB antenna lobe along track • Colocalisation with auxilliary data: (a priori sur la SSS) • Application of forward models at surface levels: • Dielectric constant • Emissivity of order 0 (flat sea) • Delta of emissivity due to roughness:SPM, Kirchhoff, SSA, 2-scale, LCA, RCA • Delta of emissivity due to foam • Transport surface-> antenna • Atmospheric attenuation • Celestial contributions : galactic & solar radiation scattering • Polarization mixing in antenna plane • Weigthing by antenna gain patterns • Comparison and Inversion/Minimization Tbmes-Tbmodel • Scientific Analysis

  21. Sunglint Flights Measured Sunglint signatures From aft looking 40° antenna 10 K

  22. Research on physical mechanisms • responsible for azimuthal • “wiggles” (LOSAC, JPL, ..): LOSAC: Residual azimuthal oscillations after galactic correction (specular reflection) of order Tb 1 K -uncorrelated with wind direction but correlated with wind speed. Typical persistence scale of order 1-15 km. Doesn’t disappear with increasing aircraft altitude from (1 to 4 km).

  23. Additional azimuthal harmonics  0 compared to the direct rough surface emissivity Development of the L2 galactic glint forward model Galactic glint formulation:

  24. Phase & amplitude of second azimuthal harmonics of the galactic glint

  25. Mathematical Formulation Tractable representation of the galactic glint contribution: Upper Hemisphere orientation angle [deg] with Relative angle between the direction towards which the 10 meter wind is blowing and the scattering direction towards the radiometer [deg]

  26. Not necessarily a pure second harmonic: • can reach 0.5 K azimuthal variation amplitude

  27. Impact of Wind Direction • Two issues arise: • Amplitude of wind second harmonic • Phase of wind second harmonic • In the emission problem, models typically imply reflectivity amplitudes on the order of .5 K with a cos(2*wd) phase of 0 deg for H-pol and 180 deg for V-pol (i.e., a 90 deg phase shift wrt wind direction).

  28. Wind Direction Harmonic Amplitudes At nadir and 3 m/s, amplitude of scattered signal harmonics peaks at around .25 K. A little less at 40 deg incidence angle and 7 m/s.

  29. But the Phase is varying All over the Place Wind direction harmonic phase for H-pol at nadir for 7 m/s wind speed. Here the phase is the same for both H and V pol! H-pol V-pol

  30. From theoretical point of view, Galactic glint is a very likely source for observed azimuthal wiggles, but with expected wiggles amplitudes slightly lower than those observed during LOSAC To be validated from on going CoSMOS data analysis

More Related