1 / 62

Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France, September 26, 2011

UPDATE ON SMOS LONG-TERM BIASES OVER THE OCEAN AND ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING OF CELESTIAL SKY NOISE. Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France, September 26, 2011. SMOS PASSES USED IN THIS ANALYSIS. DRIFT IN 2010 ONLY. NO LOSS MODEL. ONE-SLOPE LOSS MODEL.

melora
Télécharger la présentation

Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France, September 26, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UPDATE ON SMOS LONG-TERM BIASES OVER THE OCEAN AND ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING OF CELESTIAL SKY NOISE Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France, September 26, 2011

  2. SMOS PASSES USED IN THIS ANALYSIS

  3. DRIFT IN 2010 ONLY

  4. NO LOSS MODEL

  5. ONE-SLOPE LOSS MODEL

  6. TWO-SLOPE LOSS MODEL

  7. EXTENSION THROUGH JUNE 2011

  8. NO LOSS MODEL

  9. ONE-SLOPE LOSS MODEL Notice the significantdesc-ascbiasnowappearingwithboth one and twoslopelossmodelsbetweenNov 2010 and April 2011. It is of opposite sign to thatbetween Sep and Dec 2010 observedwith no loss model. It appearsthat the loss correction istoostrong in thisperiod.

  10. TWO-SLOPE LOSS MODEL The two-slope model seems to degradedesc-ascbias relative to the one-slope model.

  11. ONE-SLOPE LOSS MODEL: IMPACT OF GALACTIC REFLECTION MODEL It turns out that, for the metricsusedhere, the impact of the formulation of galactic noise scatteringat the surface on desc-ascbiasisquitesmalleven for descending passes in September. Kirchhoff scatteringmodel for galactic noise

  12. ONE-SLOPE LOSS MODEL: IMPACT OF GALACTIC REFLECTION MODEL It turns out that, for the metricsusedhere, the impact of the formulation of galactic noise scatteringat the surface on desc-ascbiasisquitesmalleven for descending passes in September. Flat surface reflection model for galactic noise

  13. DRIFT METRICS

  14. LONG TERM DRIFT JAN-DEC 2010

  15. LONG TERM DRIFT JUN-DEC 2010

  16. LONG TERM DRIFT JUNE 2010 – JUNE 2011 Considering the June 2010 to June 2011 period, thereisverylittle net drift in the AF and EAF FoVs In the ascending passes.

  17. SHORT TERM DRIFT IN 2010 AND 2011 The two-slope model seems to degradedesc-ascbias relative to the one-slope model. Two-slopedegradesdesc-ascconsistency

  18. LATEST OPERATIONAL BIAS CURVES

  19. The following are biascurves for operational DPGS Level 1B data:

  20. The following are biascurves for operational DPGS Level 1A data and using JRECON with no direct sun correction:

  21. Comparing Original DPGS with L1PP

  22. NO LOSS MODEL

  23. LATEST OPERATIONAL BIAS CURVES

  24. UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE MODEL

  25. UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE MODEL

  26. UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE MODEL

  27. UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE MODEL

  28. UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE MODEL

  29. CELESTIAL SKY NOISE MAPS

  30. HOVMOLLER PLOTS OF REFLECTED SKY NOISE

  31. SMOS RESIDUALS BASED ON COMMISSIONING REPROCESSING DATA

  32. SMOS RESIDUALS BASED ON COMMISSIONING REPROCESSING DATA

  33. FITTING A GEOMETRIC OPTICS MODEL TO THE RESIDUALS

  34. FITTING A GEOMETRIC OPTICS MODEL TO THE RESIDUALS

  35. FITTING A GEOMETRIC OPTICS MODEL TO THE RESIDUALS

  36. FITTING A GEOMETRIC OPTICS MODEL TO THE RESIDUALS

  37. FITTING A GEOMETRIC OPTICS MODEL TO THE RESIDUALS

  38. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS

  39. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS

  40. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS

  41. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS

  42. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS NEW SEMI-EMPIRICAL MODEL

  43. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS ORIGINAL KIRCHHOFF MODEL

  44. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS NEW SEMI-EMPIRICAL MODEL: Ascending Passes

  45. CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE CELESTIAL SKY MAPS NEW SEMI-EMPIRICAL MODEL: Descending passes

  46. IMPACT ON CELESTIAL SKY BIASES

  47. BIAS: ORIGINAL KIRCHHOFF MODEL

  48. BIAS: KIRCHHOFF MODEL EVALUATED AT 3 M/S WIND SPEED

  49. BIAS: EMPIRICAL GEOMETRIC OPTIC

  50. NEW SEMI-EMPIRICAL GO MODEL SWATH RESULTS

More Related