150 likes | 279 Vues
Bureau of Fire. Organization
E N D
1. Comprehensive Reviews of Pittsburghs Fire and EMS Bureaus June 26, 2008
7. Response Time Analysis (2002-06) Dispatch times for fire incidents are too long
Turnout times decreased to a 90th percentile low of 02:10 in 2006, but are still 1-minute longer than recommended
20022006: 90th percentile travel time of 05:05; exceeds the NFPA standard by one-minute, but is good for a large city
Only a very slight increase in travel time from the closure of six stations in 2005
Improvements to call processing/ dispatch and turnout times can improve total response time
11. Major Findings Good clinical care and organizational efficiency
Poor response times
Inefficient use of Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire for First Responder EMS
Cultural clash between PEMS and PBF
12. Clinical Care and Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency EMS care meets or exceeds national guidelines
Rescue personnel are well trained; only two rescues with minimal staffing is a problem
Excellent medical oversight and physician participation
PEMS is 80% financially self-sufficient
13. EMS Response Times Overall response times for all calls are poor
70th percentile= 12 min, 19 sec
90th percentile = 17 min, 48 sec
Meet 8 min 59 second response time goal in 66% of cases
Need to improve EMS dispatching
14. Cultural Differences/ PBEMS and PBF Differences in salary, retirement, and benefits are creating problems between fire and EMS
Cultural clash has been going on for years; both organizations are culpable
EMS personnel concerns about losing jobs (unfounded) if fire is given more responsibility
EMS leadership and senior personnel need to lead a cultural change
15. Recommendations Cooperative agreement between agencies to increase efficiency (Increase PBF participation in EMS and Rescue)
PBF staff four peak-load BLS ambulances
PEMS to assist with EMT-B and rescue training. Merge fire and EMS training
Leadership training where both organizations participate
16. Questions&Discussion? ? ?