1 / 18

OEDSA Conference Ohio eSIS Project

OEDSA Conference Ohio eSIS Project. Kimmberly Ratcliff, ODE Kimmberly.Ratcliff@ode.state.oh.us March 18, 2004. Topics. Project Overview Statewide Benefits History Budget Strategic Priorities Next Steps. Project Overview. Goals: Provide districts with a tool for “doing school.”

alice
Télécharger la présentation

OEDSA Conference Ohio eSIS Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OEDSA ConferenceOhio eSIS Project Kimmberly Ratcliff, ODE Kimmberly.Ratcliff@ode.state.oh.us March 18, 2004

  2. Topics • Project Overview • Statewide Benefits • History • Budget • Strategic Priorities • Next Steps

  3. Project Overview • Goals: • Provide districts with a tool for “doing school.” • Improve quality of EMIS data by easing burden on districts. • 1998: Project Team began working with Battelle to implement the Administrative Assistants Limited (AAL) brand of SMRS called “eSIS.” • Today: ODE and Battelle have implemented eSIS for numerous districts across the state.

  4. Statewide Benefits • Reduce long-term operating costs • ODE pays annual maintenance cost of eSIS • Offer Master Schedule Builder functionality to member organizations • Provide seamless EMIS integration to eliminate redundant EMIS data entry • Minimize compliance issues arising from changing EMIS data requirements • Maximize data quality by leveraging closely-coupled communications between ODE, Battelle, and AAL • Take advantage of AAL’s international economies-of-scale for R&D of new modules • Save labor costs from eSIS export capabilities (minimize re-keying of data which improves data accuracy)

  5. History • eSIS Installations – Completed: • Fall 1999 • LGCA and LEECA (~50 districts) • Columbus City • 2002-2004 School Years • NEOMIN (4 districts) & SEOVEC (1 district)

  6. History – Cont’d • eSIS Installations – In process: • Completed by Summer 2004 • South-Western City • TRECA (consortium-wide) • More NEOMIN (27) & SEOVEC (9) districts

  7. Budget • FY98-99: ODE committed $3.2M for initial development • Annual ODE commitment ($315K) covers maintenance charges for statewide project • Shared costs for training, with step-down from first year of implementation

  8. Budget – Cont’d • Site costs • Hardware investment • Oracle costs • Modules not funded by state • Staff costs for training and support

  9. Strategic Priorities • Grow user base • Provide product & support stability • Deliver value-added product enhancements • Create a long-term support framework

  10. 1. Grow User Base • See following graph: “eSIS ADM & Percent Trend – Market Share” • Shows user base growth from FY99 to estimate for FY05

  11. 2. Provide Product & Support Stability • Battelle “Model Office” • Support on-site conversions from legacy systems • Site Assessments, Configuration Identification, Data Conversion, Installation Support • Customer Training & Support • Release Testing

  12. 2. Product & Support Stability – Cont’d • Battelle “Model Office” • Software Quality Control • Site Standards, Application Standards, Version Control, Configuration Management • Define & Document User Requirements • Database Technical Assistance

  13. 3. Deliver Value-Added Product Enhancements • ODE committed $250,000 to pilot the AAL Special Education (SPED) Module • Pilot began December 2003 • More than 50 entities involved, including DA-Sites, ESCs, and districts • Excellent feedback from Alpha testing • Beta testing started on 3/8/04

  14. 4. Create Long-Term Support Framework • Formed Statewide Steering Committee • Meets bi-monthly to discuss Best Practices, Lessons Learned, etc. • Committee will issue competitive bid for this support • Will favor DA-Sites in selection process (similar to process for SSDT)

  15. Next Steps • Points to remember • Action items

More Related