1 / 9

E(M)U Expansion: Is there life after EU referenda?

E(M)U Expansion: Is there life after EU referenda?. Piet Lammens, KBC Bank. Current context EU intergration. New member states (EU-10) Existing member states (EU-15) Economic dip Political elections Dissatisfaction with present EU Frictions with new members. Referenda as catalyst.

aline-osborn
Télécharger la présentation

E(M)U Expansion: Is there life after EU referenda?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. E(M)U Expansion: Is there life after EU referenda? Piet Lammens, KBC Bank

  2. Current context EU intergration • New member states (EU-10) • Existing member states (EU-15) • Economic dip • Political elections • Dissatisfaction with present EU • Frictions with new members

  3. Referenda as catalyst • Consequences of “no” vote • Nice treaty stays • Political • Short-term turmoil • Reducing speed reform • Slowing down further expansion • No EU disintegration though

  4. “No” doesn’t bar EMU accession • Art. 4 accession treaty (“ acquis communautaire”) • No opt-out clausule • So no political discussion • But “technical” discussion on criteria • With at worst: stricter interpretation

  5. Does change in GSP bring EMU closer? • Difference Maastricht- GSP criteria • GSP criteria: 3%- 60% • Exception: extra pension costs due to reform • From 2005 onwards • Although degressive: 100%, 80%, …..20% • Applicable on deliberation EMU accession?

  6. EMU: key in hands of the new member states (1) • Important: Is there deep politicam commitment? • Make distinction: 7 - 3 countries • 7 Small countries: deep political commitment and fullfillment criteria within reach • No need for flexible interpretation of criteria • 2007: Slovenia, Lithuania, Estonia • 2008: Latvia, Cyprus, Malta • 2009: Slovakia

  7. EMU: key in hands of new members (2) • But is the political commitment deep enough in: • Tchech republic: wil tot toetreding? • Hongary, Poland: will to accession is wel routed, but will to fullfill all criteria is sub par • 2010 is still realistic, but action now needed

  8. Bulgaria and Romania • EU accession 1 january 2007, unless… • “no” to referenda of no consequence • Bulgaria wants EMU accession in 2009! • Positive surprise is possible

  9. Turkey, Croatia, etc…. • No short-term impact • potential hindrance longer term • EU accession = political decision

More Related