150 likes | 280 Vues
This presentation explores the 7Cs framework—Components, Engagement, Targets, Care, Confer, Captivate, Clarify, Consolidate, Challenge, Control, Trust, Cooperation, Ambitiousness, Diligence, and Satisfaction—as a means to improve student engagement in secondary schools across different deciles. We examine engagement indices based on national distribution, aligning with the Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching. Additionally, the analysis includes calculations on between-classroom consistency to guide school and district officials in identifying needs and prioritizing resources for improved educational outcomes.
E N D
7Cs Components Engagement Targets Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction
7Cs Components Engagement Targets Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction
7Cs Components Engagement Targets Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction
7Cs Components Engagement Targets Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction
Engagement and the Quality of Teaching Student engagement in this district’s secondary schools by deciles of the composite national 7Cs classroom distribution. Standard deviation units are defined on the national student level distribution for the listed engagement indices.
Alignment with other frameworks?E.g., Charlotte Danielson’sFramework for Teaching
*Presenter’s calculations. From Ferguson with Danielson, forthcoming early in 2014, in an edited volume that builds on the MET project. Between-Classroom Consistency Same-teacher between-classroom correlations are:* • 0.38 for value added • 0.61 for the Tripod 7Cs composite
Multiple levels of drill down for school and district officials looking to identify needs and set priorities for resource allocation.