1 / 12

LASZLO GYERKO Competition Councillor, Member of the Board Romanian Competition Council

Sofia Competition Forum November 12th, 2012. Bringing benefits of competition to low-income groups -priorities for NCAs-. LASZLO GYERKO Competition Councillor, Member of the Board Romanian Competition Council. C ompetition and poverty reduction. Direct relationship

alka
Télécharger la présentation

LASZLO GYERKO Competition Councillor, Member of the Board Romanian Competition Council

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sofia Competition Forum November 12th, 2012 Bringing benefits of competition to low-income groups -priorities for NCAs- LASZLO GYERKO Competition Councillor, Member of the Board Romanian Competition Council

  2. Competition and poverty reduction • Direct relationship • Lower prices for basic necessities • Lower costs for businesses • Incentives for innovation and investment Developing and transition economies – more vulnerable to anticompetitive practices

  3. Areas of intervention • Advocacy initiatives • Competition policy – priority area for reform • Promote wider understanding in all levels of government • Remove regulations that create barriers to entry and prevent benefits from reaching targets • Effective enforcement actions • Focus on unnecessary distortions (cartels, abuse of dominance) 3

  4. Advocacy tools Need of appropriate operational tools • RIA – competition filter • Attending Gvt preparatory meeting • Screening draft normative acts • Concluding cooperation protocols with Gvt authorities • Setting up common working groups (e.g. Bid Rigging Module)

  5. Setting priorities – key sectors with outstanding impact on overall population • 2004 – 13 key sectors (energy, telecomm, postal services, food retail etc) • List reviewed regularly • Market studies and sector inquiries • Results and recommendations – enforcement actions and specific advocacy initiatives

  6. Advocacy actions - Retail banking Harmonization with EU Directive on consumer credit (2010) – extension of scope in RO Proposal of RCC -elimination/reduction of the early reimbursement fee to all types of consumer loans Impact analysis (2011): increased client mobility, lower switching costs higher competition on the retail banking market 6

  7. Advocacy actions - Retail banking 7

  8. Advocacy actions – public procurement Organizational changes – dedicated unit for PP Cooperation protocols Implementation of international best practices – OECD Guidelines on Bid Rigging, introduction of CIBDs Enforcement actions – 3x no. of investigations on bid rigging in 2011 and 2012 8

  9. Liberal professions Enforcement actions – taxi services, dental technicians, bailiffs, accountants Issues for intervention (ex-ante - advocacy or ex-post - enforcement) Setting min/max fees and tariffs Barriers to entry Consultations in professional associations – facilitator of cartels 9

  10. Sector inquiry – milk market Asymmetry in bargaining power between supply and demand Role of contracts Price transparency Impact of EU agricultural policy Codes of best practices Recommendations: Amendments of the legislative framework Market mechanisms Correction of asymmetries (i.e. framework contracts) 10

  11. Conclusions Benefits may only be generated by: Setting priorities Effective enforcement Supporting policies Advocating for Gvt support Raising awareness 11

  12. Thank you for your attention!

More Related