1 / 22

Text

Text. Data. Simulated data AMSREA, MODIS A-T Cross-validation approach Full fields as input data and truth 15 day sliding data window Remove 3 or 5 days of data Calculate error for middle day. 2-D Bi-cubic Smoothing Spline. Inoue (1986): tension parameter, roughness parameter

Télécharger la présentation

Text

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Text

  2. Data • Simulated data • AMSREA, MODIS A-T • Cross-validation approach • Full fields as input data and truth • 15 day sliding data window • Remove 3 or 5 days of data • Calculate error for middle day

  3. 2-D Bi-cubic Smoothing Spline • Inoue (1986): tension parameter, roughness parameter • Tense splines (> 0.9) because of extrapolation • Very smooth splines can’t interpolate over large gaps • Interpolating splines whiten residuals & overfitting • .1 < rho (roughness parameter) < 1.0

  4. Objective Analysis

  5. Influential Data Points (IDP): • O(1,000,000) data pts to O(10) IDP at each OA location • Computationally intensive part of OA code • IDP should be the data most correlated with OA location • PMOA algorithm was designed to efficiently find IDP • New algorithm is finding IDP in local polar coordinates • Goal: Find IDP most correlated that surround OA location •  reduce bias

  6. Optical flow method • DT/dt=0  δT/δt=-(uδT/δx + vδT/δy) • Trend Field is used for input • Moore-Penrose Inverse Solution • Time derivative calculated with δt=2 days • Spatial derivatives weighted (1/4,1/2,1/4) • FDVs outliers are removed (large & near-zero) • Spline smoothing of FDV estimates

  7. Cross-validation error estimates:Remove 3 input days of data insliding 15 day data windowCalculate estimation error for the middle day for 3 months FDV-based estimates were 10%better, RMS of .51 vs .56

  8. Input test Data

  9. OA with FDV & zero FDV

  10. 3 days removed

  11. 5 days of data removed

  12. Future Work • Tune some parameters • Influential Data Point Selection • Estimation variance vs resolution/bias • Merge FDV with MUR: FDV(scale)

More Related