1 / 27

Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers

Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. 2006/11/9 Taylor ,Ruby ,Sain. About Miguel Nussbaum. System of information. About Gustavo Zurita. Science of Computation. CL v.s MCSCL. Abstract. Where are used collaborative learning?

alma
Télécharger la présentation

Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers 2006/11/9 Taylor ,Ruby ,Sain

  2. About Miguel Nussbaum System of information

  3. About Gustavo Zurita Science of Computation

  4. CL v.s MCSCL

  5. Abstract • Where are used collaborative learning? • How weaknesses will happen and be solved? • What device will be used ?

  6. introduction • What the goal of CL • Vygotsky said • Social interactions and collaborative efforts • Handhelds & Mobility

  7. Background and related work • Why collaborative learning has been frequently seen as a stimulus for cognitive development • Piagetian • Vygotskian • children’s use of technology • Modify the nature and the efficacy of the interaction • Paradigms • One or multiple peripherals • Side-by-side computers

  8. The relationships between communication , negotiation , coordination and interactivity in CSCL • Communication in three different ways • Verbal • Physical • graphical • Teamwork is vital for a successful CSCL environment • The lack of visual contact and body language • Collaboration around computers vs. collaboration through computers

  9. Children as users of face-to-face CSCL • Children enjoy playing together • Existing technological infrastructure available in schools

  10. Handhelds as support to collaborative learning activities • As computers get smaller and more personal • Mobility , flexibility and instant access of handhelds • Beam information • WILDs • Core concepts • Students need to become owners of their computing environment • Information needs to seek out for the student • The tools used in the computer environment need to naturally extend a student’s computer use • Computing facilities need to empower a student to naturally become part a larger community • despite the apparent restricting aspect of limited size

  11. Evaluation of CL activity for children without technology • Method • Understand children’s social interactions and shared learning • Videotapes • Coordination • Communication • Organization • Negotiation • Interaction • Mobility • Quantitative and qualitative data was gathered form Video ,field notes , interviews

  12. Description of math and language CL activities • The materials used in both activities are • A considerable number of cards • Envelopes containing cards • A cardborad was use for the language activity

  13. Subjects and settings • In low-income elementary school of Santiago de Chile • 20 days,35-to45 min activities • 48 students(21 girls and 21 boys) • Ranging 6-7 years • Language activity • Seven groups • Three members • Math activity • Four groups • Three members • Plus three groups of five member • None of the students had previously worked on CL activities

  14. Procedure • Instructions • Roles , rules , tasks and objective description • Video recorded and closely observed • Interrupted when help was needed • 15-to 20-min interview

  15. Results (1) • Coordination • Others are left aside • The amount of members in a group is higher • Communication • administration of material • Affinity reasons • Need to be very close

  16. Results (2) • organization • Manage a considerable amount of material • Uncomfortable • Delays their tasks • Loses visibility • Negotiation • Impose their point of view • Causing others to be left aside • Interactivity • A CL activity must be interactive • Do not respond • Breaking the collaboration • Mobility • Require a physically close approach

  17. Solving weaknesses of CL activities with Handhelds: MCSCL • What can Handhelds offer? (table2) • Mobility • Ubiquitous • Transparency of computer network • A model of MCSCL • 8 taxonomy factors • Appropriate teacher behavior • Appropriate member behavior • Nature of learning tasks • Member roles • Task materials that enable execution of task • CL goal definition • Formative evaluation with feedback from peers or from educators • Additive evaluation and reward structure • CL components plus mobility and organization of material

  18. Solving weaknesses of CL activities with Handhelds: MCSCL

  19. Evaluation of two MCSCL activities • Math and language MCSCL • Language • Each handheld shows a syllable that to be combined with the syllables of the other two children to form as many words as possible • Each member contribute s with her/his ideas, promoting a discussion with the others, to perform their word formation • Once members agree upon the word to be formed, they have two buttons available to form the word in a sequence

  20. Evaluation of two MCSCL activities • Math and language MCSCL • Language (con.) • The "cloud" button: to choose the syllable • The "face" button: allow child to indicate that she/he is not considering the syllable to form a word • Once the word is formed, a voice message played, two options can be chosen, if someone disagree, another voice message will be played • “si” button: continue forming new words with the same syllables • “no” button: provide all members agree on the same action

  21. Evaluation of two MCSCL activities

  22. Evaluation of two MCSCL activities • Math and language MCSCL • Math • Each group member having a set of given objects and achieving the specified number for each of the objects by sending and receiving these from another member of group • Each member is identified by given color, used as the main background • The child select the button that corresponds to the group member from whom she/he wants to receive an object

  23. Evaluation of two MCSCL activities • Subjects and settings • 48 students (25 girls, 23 boys) • Language: 7 groups 21 students • Math: 4 groups 3 students & 3 groups 5 students • Procedure • The main difference with CL • The possibility for the children to take a handheld anywhere • Target • Analyze the children’s behavior • Analyze user’s behavior toward other children • Analyze user’s behavior toward machine

  24. Evaluation of two MCSCL activities • Results

  25. Conclusions • Usability problem • MCSCL V.S CSCL • Possibility to mediate the interactivity • Encouraging of the members mobility • MCSCL • Organization of information • Enabling students to collaborate in groups • Monitoring real-time progress • Controlling the interaction, negotiation, portable ability

  26. Reference • http://www2.ing.puc.cl/ipaq/

More Related