110 likes | 208 Vues
Below the Belt Working Group Report. C. C. H. Jui April 29, 2005. General Discussion on Apr.27. Working group discussed in general terms the potential capabilities of the proposed non-imaging Cerenkov Array
E N D
Below the Belt Working Group Report C. C. H. Jui April 29, 2005
General Discussion on Apr.27 • Working group discussed in general terms the potential capabilities of the proposed non-imaging Cerenkov Array • Some discussions to alternatives (e.g. “Dice”-like imaging Cerenkov detectors, using timing of Cerenkov light…etc…possible applcations to Below-the Knee
Some BLANCA information(Joe Fowler) • There are ~5-6 orders ofm magnitude more Cerenkov photons than gammas and electrons in a shower • The lateral distributions is flatter than electrons: comparable to muons
Basics of the Technique • Light near the core are emitted deeper in the atmosphere
CASA BLANCA and MIA • CASA array: 500m 500m • 144 BLANCA units deployed in pairs • Typical distance between units ~40 m • Energy Range 1014.510 16.5 eV
Typical BLANCAEvent • Shows BLANCA has very dense (overkill) sampling: • Probably light composition: Energy ~5 PeV
Lateral Profile Fitting • Fitted to exponential (inside 120m) + power law (beyond 200m) curve • C120energy • Inner slope s Xmax • Outer power index b not used
BLANCA Composition Analysis • Composition is fitted in 5 energy bins in the range 1014.510 16.5 eV • Data appeared to require at least p, He, CNO and Fe for reasonable fit.
Proposed Design Schematic • Combination fluorescence + Cerenkov + muon array • 3km 3km • Can probably sparsify the Cerenkov spacing from BLANCA • May need larger light collectors to reach down to 1014 eV