1 / 25

Using corpora to define target-language use in translation

UCCTS 2010 Edge Hill University 27-29 July 2010. Using corpora to define target-language use in translation. Rudy Loock Université de Lille 3, France & CNRS UMR 8163 STL. 1. Introduction. Starting point : teaching considerations Literal translation belongs to an ideal world

alphonse-meller
Télécharger la présentation

Using corpora to define target-language use in translation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UCCTS 2010 Edge Hill University 27-29 July 2010 Using corpora to define target-language use in translation Rudy Loock Université de Lille 3, France & CNRS UMR 8163 STL

  2. 1. Introduction • Starting point : teaching considerations • Literal translation belongs to an ideal world • Translators have to face several types of constraints when translating from source-language (SL) to target-language (TL) : • Morphological • Syntactic • Stylistic

  3. 1. Introduction • Morphological constraints : some morpheme associations are possible in SL but not in TL (1) Adj + -ly : slow>slowly / lent>lentement ; quick>quickly / rapide>rapidement ; clever>cleverly / intelligent>intelligemment fervent>fervently / fervent>*fervemment (avec ferveur) ; interesting>interestingly / intéressant>*intéressamment (de façon intéressante) (2) success>successful / succès>*successeux (avec succès) (3) compounding : white-teethed ; leather-bound ; gay-friendly = lexical gaps

  4. 1. Introduction • Syntactic constraints : Some syntactic organizations are possible in SL but not in TL (4) dative passive: Lily was given flowers. >*Lily a été donnée des fleurs. (Lily a reçu des fleurs.) (5) satellite-framed vs. verb-framed language (cf. Talmy, Slobin): Mary swam across the river. > *Mary a nagé à travers la rivière. (Mary a traversé la rivière à la nage.) (6) stranded prepositions: The article which I referred to > *L’article que j’ai référé à (l’article auquel j’ai référé)

  5. 1. Introduction • Stylistic constraints Some literal translations are impossible because the result would be long, complex or clumsy sentences that do not combine together properly (7) The reason I don't have him thrown out is because I find all this curiously thrilling. => Si je ne le fais pas jeter dehors, c'est que je trouve toute cette histoire curieusement excitante.

  6. 1. Introduction • But not sufficient : need to explain why one translation sounds ‘better’, ‘more natural’ twhile another ‘sounds like translation’ : « That’s not what native speakers usually say… » « Your translation is fine, but does not sound completely natural… » • =Usage/langue use constraint that takes into account the way real people really use the language

  7. 1. Introduction • Problem: how to determine language use/usage? Some is codified/lexicalized and listed in dictionaries: table leg vs. pied de table cast-iron case vs. dossier en béton But what about non-codified usage? • Intuition of native speakers? (What if you’re not?) • General conceptions based on personal experience (talent)? • More scientific way of determining the usage constraint? => Corpora investigation

  8. 2. Determining usage • Lexical usage Expressions to refer to ‘influenza endemic to birds’ : E : bird flu | avian (in)flu(enza) | H5N1 virus/strain F : grippe du poulet | grippe aviaire | virus/souche H5N1 The different terms seem to suggest a series of equivalences : (e.g. bird flu = grippe du poulet) But speakers do not use these terms in the same way/with the same frequency in English and in French => Search on Google

  9. 2. Determining usage Google search July 2010

  10. 2. Determining usage • Expression of periodicity : weekly vs. hebdomadairement Google search July 2010

  11. 2. 2. Determining usage • Syntactic usage : more difficult to evaluate e.g. relative clauses : • not always translated ‘literally’, i.e. using the same structure • seems to be some systematicity independently of syntactic constraints • Corpus search • But Google impossible to use

  12. 2. Determining usage • Corpus-based study on the translation of RCs from English to French and from French to English (Loock 2009) • Corpus: first 25,000 words taken from: • 2 novels originally written in French and translated into English (N. Hornby’s How to be Good and D. Lodge’s Thinks…) • 2 novels originally written in English and translated into French (F. Beigbeder’s Windows on the world and B. Werber’s Les Fourmis) • Search for some systematic differences/patterns

  13. 2. Determining usage • Global results : RCs not systematically maintained * Participle clauses, independent clauses, adjectives, noun phrases, parentheticals, ellipsis…

  14. 2. Determining usage • Systematic non-literal translations (ceteris paribus): • (Much) more frequent use of cleft structures (it is [X] that…/c’est [X] qui…) in F than in E: (8) Et tout d'un coup c'est David qui prend la parole, en fixant les marches de l'escalier au milieu desquelles coule une rivière. (Beigbeder 99) => Then, suddenly, David starts to speak, staring at the river running down the steps. (9) C'est une antenne anonyme qui vient d'émettre cette phéromone phrase. (Werber 71) • An anonymous antenna had just emitted this pheromone sentence. (10) Ce sont tout d'abord les murs qui subissent une grande secousse latérale. (Werber 110) => First the walls were shaken by a big lateral tremor.

  15. 2. Determining usage • In general, RCs are often reformulated when translated from E to F with prepositional phrases: (11) He had a glass of white wine in his hand and I guess it wasn't the first one he'd imbibed that evening. (Lodge 51) => Il tenait à la main un verre de vin blanc et ce n'était sûrement pas pour lui le premier de la soirée. (12) Or we may develop computers that are carbon-based, like biological organisms, instead of silicon-based ones.' (Lodge 90) => Nous pourrions aussi élaborer des ordinateurs à base de carbone comme les organismes biologiques, au lieu qu'ils soient à base de silicone.  (13) David's only steady income derives from a newspaper column he contributes to our local paper. (Hornby 15) => David tire son seul revenu régulier d'une rubrique dans notre journal local. 

  16. 2. Determining usage • Frenchs RCs, when they are reformulated, are often replaced with –ing clauses (25% in our corpus): (14) Si un Boeing entrait sous mes pieds, je saurais enfin ce qui me torture depuis un an : je saurais la fumée noire qui monte du sol, la chaleur qui fait fondre les murs, les fenêtres explosées… (Beigbeder 21) => If a Boeing were to crash below my feet, I would finally know what it is that has tortured me for a year now: the black smoke seeping from the floor, the heat melting the walls, the exploded windows... (15) L'écrivain est comme la cavalerie, qui arrive toujours trop tard. (Beigbeder 25) => The writer is like the cavalry, always arriving too late.

  17. 2. Determining usage • Some general tendencies can be defined for syntactic usage and help translation learners to provide translations that respect such usage. N.B. : small corpus (4x25,000 words) no hard rules

  18. 3. Questions and issues • Whyisthis important? Cf. study by Cappelle on translation from E to F, specifically on VPsexpressing direction : Mary [swam] [across] the river. Mary [traversa] la rivière [à la nage]/[en nageant]. What happens when translators translate from a verb-framed (F)to a satellite(E)-framed language (or vice-versa)? Do theyreframe or do theyotherwiserephrase?

  19. 3. Questions and issues Comparisonbetween 3 corpora : • A corpus of translatedtextsfrom SL to TL (e.g. Victor Hugo in English) • A corpus of SL texts (e.g. Victor Hugo in French) • A corpus of TL texts (e.g. Charles Dickens in English) • Cappelle’sresults show thattranslatedtexts and original textsclearlydiffer: “under-representation of manner-of-motion verbs (typical of Germanic languages) in English translated from French as compared with original English” => What does this mean about the quality of the translations?

  20. 3. Questions and issues • Isn’t there a danger of trying to reduce a language to a stereotypical series of linguistic properties? e.g. The fact that grippe du poulet (bird flu) is hardly ever used in F does not mean it is *never* used. • Rigidify language use and personification of language (E uses bird flu while F used grippe aviaire). • Should not be considered as hard rules but tendencies translators should be aware of.

  21. 3. Questions and issues • Languages change with time, so usage changes with time • can corpora show such evolution?

  22. 3. Questions and issues

  23. Conclusion • At a time when usage-based linguistics/grammar is becoming more and more popular, one might also consider usage-based translation. • Permits the discovery of systematic tendencies that are characteristic of specific languages. • Final aim : Taking usage into account improves the quality (fluency, natural character) of translations.

  24. References • Cappelle, B. 2010. Reframing and rephrasing in translation, Talk given at the Verbes et complexités verbales Symposium, Paris 7, France, May 31-June 1. • Loock, R. 2009. ‘Parce qu’en plus il faut traduire la syntaxe ?!’ : contraintes et stratégies dans la traduction de la structuration d’un texte , in D'Amélio (ed.), Actes du colloque international « La forme comme paradigme du traduire » Mons; CIPA : 173-190. • Slobin, D. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology & the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven eds. Relating Events in Narrative. Vol 2, 219-257. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. • Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring, vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Relative clauses corpus: - Hornby, N. 2001. How to Be Good. Viking Airside Ed. Translated by I. Chapman. La Bonté mode d’emploi. 10-18.  - Lodge, D. 2002. Thinks. Penguin New Ed. Translated by S. Mayoux. Pensées secrètes. Rivages Poche.  - Beigbeder, F. 2005. Windows on the World. Gallimard. Translated by F. Wynne. Windows on the World. Harper Perennial.  - Werber, B. 1991. Les Fourmis. Livre de poche. Translated by M. Rocques. The Empire of the Ants. Bantam books.

  25. Thank you for your attention! Contact: rudy.loock@univ-lille3.fr http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/sitespersonnels/loock/index.htm

More Related