1 / 15

Year in Review: Clean Air Act

Year in Review: Clean Air Act. Things Are Getting Really Complicated. Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8 , 2010. Clean Air Act & GHGs. That was this morning. Boiler MACT & CISWI. NESHAPs (aka MACT) = hazardous air pollutant (HAP) standards

alvis
Télécharger la présentation

Year in Review: Clean Air Act

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Year in Review: Clean Air Act Things Are Getting Really Complicated Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010

  2. Clean Air Act & GHGs • That was this morning

  3. Boiler MACT & CISWI • NESHAPs (aka MACT) = hazardous air pollutant (HAP) standards • Typically apply to major sources of HAP (10/25) • Section 129 incinerator standards • Apply to sources regardless of emission rate • Regulate much more than just HAP • By statute, same unit cannot be subject to both 129 standard and NESHAP • Boiler MACT issued in 2005

  4. Boiler MACT & CISWI • Boiler MACT issued in 2005 • CISWI definitions rule also issued in 2005 • Sierra Club challenged both rules • Claimed that EPA exceeded authority when it defined solid waste as material combusted at a facility that does not recover thermal energy for a useful purpose • DC Circuit agreed that solid waste definition too narrow • Vacated both rules in 2007

  5. Boiler MACT & CISWI • June 4, 2010 EPA proposed new CISWI and Boiler MACT rules • Proposed boiler standards for area and major sources • Area source standards referred to as GACT • Sources burning any solid waste subject to CISWI • EPA also proposed definition of solid waste rule • Subcategorized by fuel/boiler type • MACT regulates five different pollutants • CISWI regulates nine pollutants • Some (e.g., CO) serve as surrogates

  6. Boiler MACT & CISWI • Bottom line: • Standards are extraordinarily strict • Will be very expensive to comply with • Particularly brutal to biomass industry • Many manufacturers cannot produce a unit that complies with standards • Makes small units cost-prohibitive • Huge amount of testing required • Sad Irony: Biomass boilers savaged by standards and yet biomass boilers emit low levels of HAPs

  7. Boiler MACT & CISWI • Lisa Jackson stated in September 28, 2010 letter to U.S. Senators concerned about impact on biomass: • “the final standards will most assuredly differ from the proposed ones” • EPA must sign final rules by January 16, 2011 • Typically published 3 to 6 weeks later • MACT/GACT compliance date: 3 years later • CISWI compliance date: Up to 5 years later

  8. Other NESHAPs • Portland Cement MACT • Issued September 9, 2010 • EPA anticipated that Hg standards in rule could close Durkee, OR plant even though it is acknowledged as the best controlled plant in world • Litigation to start in early November • Utility MACT • EPA had issued mercury trading program (CAMR) • D.C. Circuit struck down • EPA now developing HAP standard for utility boilers • Separate and distinct from Boiler MACT

  9. Other NESHAPs • Area Source NESHAPs • Huge proliferation over past 18 months • Very poorly written • Very confusing as to applicability • DEQ declining to adopt RICE NESHAP and returning RICE NSPS to EPA • Unprecedented move by DEQ • Will do nothing to help Oregon sources determine applicability • SSM provisions

  10. New NAAQS • NO2 • Issued February 9, 2010 • New standard: • 1 hour: 100 ppb • 3 year average of annual 98th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations • EPA retaining annual NO2 standard • 53 ppb • PM2.5

  11. New NAAQS • SO2 • Issued June 22, 2010 • New standard: • 1 hour: 75 ppb • 3 year average of annual 99th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations • EPA revoking: • 24 hour SO2 standard • Annual SO2standard

  12. New NAAQS • PM2.5 • 1997: EPA established annual and 24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5 for the first time • 2006: EPA revised the 24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5 • Very difficult to implement • EPA issued PM10 surrogate policy • Allowed states to regulate PM2.5 by regulating PM10 • EPA now indicating that it will withdraw surrogate policy • Will require formal evaluation of PM2.5 • Problematic due to lack of data and difficulty testing • EQC adopted temporary rules regulating PM2.5 at August meeting

  13. Regional Haze • Statutory mandate to decrease visibility impacts to natural conditions by 2064 • First phase: BART • Applies to sources that pre-dated PSD • Only source in state subject to BART is Boardman • Initial BART requirements established by rule on June 19, 2009 • Comment period just closed on DEQ rework of Boardman BART requirements

  14. Regional Haze After BART • Reasonable Progress Goals • Visibility conditions expected to be achieved at the required milestone dates • First key milestone date is 2018 • BART gets State to 2018 • More controls may be required beyond that • EPA guidance: control requirements extend beyond BART sources

  15. Hell’s Canyon Trend Analysis

More Related