1 / 14

TRANSPARENCY – Why, for whom, how? Sabine Prem TU Graz Office of International Relations

TRANSPARENCY – Why, for whom, how? Sabine Prem TU Graz Office of International Relations. Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZ ie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005. What do we understand by transparency? Do we want transparency? Why do we want transparency? ↓

amaris
Télécharger la présentation

TRANSPARENCY – Why, for whom, how? Sabine Prem TU Graz Office of International Relations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TRANSPARENCY – Why, for whom, how? Sabine Prem TU Graz Office of International Relations Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  2. What do we understand by transparency? Do we want transparency? Why do we want transparency? ↓ How do we achieve transparency? Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  3. What do we understand by transparency? Measures: • to make studies readable, understandable and comparable • inside and outside the university • in Austria and from abroad Do we want transparency? • certain unwillingness to change habits, to give up traditional methods of teaching, to update course contents Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  4. Why do we want transparency? Because we (different persona) want to: • participate in EU programmes? • apply for the ECTS / DS Label? • implement Bologna goals? • attract more students? • enable our graduates to continue their studies abroad? • be competitive? • internationalise our campus? • get accredited by a foreign accreditation board? Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  5. How do we achieve transparency? • ECTS • Diploma Supplement • other instruments: e.g. accreditation by non-European boards, individual explanations (course contents, hours), „Studienverlaufsanalyse“, handbook on quality assurance Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  6. ECTS What are the transparency instruments? • ECTS Information Package • General information on the university • Description of study programmes and courses • Information about academic and administrative matters • ECTS forms • Transcript of Records • Learning Agreement, Application Form • ECTS Coordinators • ECTS Grading Scale • ECTS Credits Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  7. ECTS Information Package Problem areas: • not enough information, information is not structured, it cannot be found, is not updated, cannot be understood as outsider • not considered important, too time-consuming • fear of giving too much away when describing courses in detail What is necessary? • information has to be structured according to needs of (possible future) students, it no longer concerns only students in mobility programmes • course descriptions are requirement for teaching • printed and electronic information, German & English • easy to read for outsiders (outside of the institution) What has proved to be useful? • course information: simple semester plans, good quality course descriptions, description of learning outcomes, competences, levels • model for course descriptions • general information: keep in mind who the information is for Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  8. ECTS forms: Transcript of Records, Learning Agreement, Application form Problem areas: • often adaptions of the forms are used → cause unnecessary work • credit allocation • learning agreement: not binding, does not guarantee recognition as such, course information is often not available / incomplete when needed What is necessary? • use of standardised forms • credit allocation has to work within the institution in all cases What has proved to be useful? • curricula only in ECTS credits (instead of semester hours), model semester plans (course structure diagrams) as part of the curriculum • acceptance of ECTS- and similar forms for incoming students Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  9. ECTS Coordinators Problem areas: • responsibilities not clear • ECTS departmental coordinators not involved in curriculum development What is necessary? • shift responsibility from international office to faculty level / study programmes → appoint one or two ECTS departmental coordinators (students, ECTS) with specific responsibilities • departmental coordinators have to be included in curriculum development ECTS Grading Scale Problem areas: • Austria has an absolute grading system • no statistical data • failure rates are not compared • small groups, better grades in higher semesters Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  10. ECTS Credits Problem areas: • official length of programme vs. average length • credit allocation (30 / 60) • amount of workload in hours resembling 60 ECTS credits (Austria: 1500 hours per year) • 1 ECTS credit at TU Graz ≠ 1 ECTS credit at xxx • different amount of ECTS credits for the same course in different study programmes • amount of workload outside of Europe is often restricted to contact hours What is necessary? • be flexible, take small steps • find one study programme in which credit allocation is correct → use it as model • investigate why average length of studies is longer than official length → take necessary measures to reduce length Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  11. Diploma Supplement • additional information on the degree • extremely important outside of Europe, but does it then provide sufficient information? • negotiations between Europe and Third Countries necessary • workload outside of Europe is often restricted to contact hours Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  12. Recognition Recognition of ECTS Credits • ECTS credits do not have an absolute value • recognition should be based on • content and • learning outcomes and competences • in reality recognition also depends on • type of institution, reputation of institution • person responsible for recognition Recognition of Degrees • within Europe: 2 cycle system favours recognition • outside of Europe: problematic because of different lenghts and requirements of the programmes • necessary to provide information on entrance requirements to the university and on the programme structure Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  13. Conclusions • ECTS and Diploma Supplement are valuable and indispensable tools for transparency • theory has to be put into a practice that works for the institutions • ECTS often evokes unpleasant connotations but it is time for a change • flexibility is needed in some cases whereas fixed structures are needed in others • honesty is transparency • ??? Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

  14. http://www.international.TUGraz.at http://www.international.tugraz.at/en/ECTSeng.htm http://www.international.tugraz.at/en/Bologna_TUGrazeng.htm Transparency instruments and recognition (ECTS & DS), GRAZie BOLOGNA, April 29-30, 2005

More Related