1 / 12

UKSG 2005

UKSG 2005. All or Nothing: towards an Orderly Retreat from Big Deals?. Big Deals: what are we talking about?. Full Collection (Elsevier: Freedom Collection!) Subject Collections Cross-access arrangements E-access to Print collections E-only access to former Print collections.

amethyst-norton
Télécharger la présentation

UKSG 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UKSG 2005 All or Nothing: towards an Orderly Retreat from Big Deals?

  2. Big Deals: what are we talking about? • Full Collection (Elsevier: Freedom Collection!) • Subject Collections • Cross-access arrangements • E-access to Print collections • E-only access to former Print collections

  3. Publishers and Big Deals • Publishers have been remarkably flexible in defining new models, to ensure that: + Actual spending levels are not decreasing + Pricecaps are above inflation • Publishers mainly are defending existing cashflows

  4. Seduction and Addiction 1 • Big Deals are attractive for: + Users: never find a closed door + Librarians: easy to handle and no embarassment of choices + Publishers: no intermediairies; guaranteed turn over; broad visibility

  5. Seduction and Addiction 2 • Big Deals are addictive because: + It’s what users expect from Internetsources: always an answer, everything for free + Change is difficult to realise; optimal value for money; unattractiveness of alternatives from a value for money perspective

  6. Problems • Lack of Flexibility • Cost Sharing and Cost Division • Decisionmaking within Institutes & Consortia • No Entry for countries with no substantial subscription track

  7. The Netherlands • Negotiations with Wiley, Springer, Elsevier • Current Agreements: full package, pricecaps ± 5 % • Ambitions UKB: + decrease increase + more value for money + more flexibility

  8. Results 1 • Wiley and Springer: new full package deals, differnt combinations of lower pricecaps, more content, more participants - NB 1. Not more Flexibility!! - NB 2. Discussions with Wiley about pay per view

  9. Results 2 • Elsevier: no lower pricecap, but more flexibility: • pay more OR get less • Still negotiating on more content (back files) and more participants (Polytechnics)

  10. Other Remarks • Libraries (and Publishers!) find it difficult to walk away from Big Deals • As soon as publishers offer choices, consortia tend to disagree • Consortia show little awareness of the benefits of mutual behaviour

  11. Yet another Complication: getting your figures right • Important but hard to Perform, because: + different combinations of P and E + effects of E-only discounts + effects of higher VAT + effects of costdivision models • To be noticed: some publishers have different business units for P and E!!

  12. Thank you

More Related