1 / 24

UKSG

Collaborative e-journals project in the NHS East of England. Lyn Edmonds, Papworth Hospital & Carolyn Alderson, JISC Collections. UKSG. Introductions. Lyn Edmonds, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Library, Heritage & Knowledge Services Manager

buthainah-feroze
Télécharger la présentation

UKSG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collaborative e-journals project in the NHS East of England Lyn Edmonds, Papworth Hospital & Carolyn Alderson, JISC Collections UKSG

  2. Introductions • Lyn Edmonds, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust • Library, Heritage & Knowledge Services Manager • Co-ordinator of EoE Health Libraries Group • E-journals Project Group Chair • Carolyn Alderson, JISC Collections • Licensing Manager • Previously Content Negotiator, Content Complete Ltd • Acquired by JISC Collections from Jan 1st

  3. Who is the room? • Publishers • Librarians • Subscription agents • Others

  4. Getting started • Journals Project Group: early 2007 • Representation and users • More content • Equitable access • Point-of-need access • Better value for money

  5. Early issues considered • Separate libraries in an informal network • How would we decide what to purchase? • How would we fund it? • Would everyone embrace e-only? • Avoid duplication with national work

  6. First steps undertaken • Data collection and analysis • Print: duplication and total spend • Scoring system • Funding options

  7. Moving forward • How to manage the e-journals? • Could anyone help us? • National developments • Quality not quantity • Enlisted help of Content Complete Ltd

  8. Ready to start • Plans finalising late 2007 • Funding solutions • Business case to Strategic Health Authority (SHA) • Project breakthrough

  9. Role of CCL • 2007: • Central funding model • Request for quotations from many publishers (one print copy free) • Explain structure and technical requirements of ECLaKSA • Provide information to the group in a standard format • Check publisher’s licences

  10. How publishers responded • Small scale • 70 titles in total • From 1 to 28 journals per publisher

  11. 2008 publishers involved • “Society Publishers” • American Academy of Pediatrics • American Roentgen Ray Society • Royal College of General Practitioners • Royal College of Psychiatrists • NEJM

  12. 2008 publishers involved • “Major Publishers” • Elsevier • LWW/OVID • Oxford University Press • SAGE Publications • Springer • Wiley and Blackwell - Wiley Blackwell

  13. Remit and role of CCL • During 2008 for 2009 agreements: • Take the 11 agreements and negotiate renewal for 2009 • Free print - issues • Multi-year • Consider usage with negotiations to some extent • Regular reporting and meetings • Decision with ECLaKSA • Modify NHS England licence to work at regional level • Negotiate use of the licence with various publishers • SHA for signature

  14. Unexpected situation • Budget difficulty at SHA • Chair of the e-project group steps down • Report: “From project to service” • Survey • External review • New structure and approach

  15. Remit and role of CCL • For 2010 renewals • Take the 11 agreements and renew for 2010 in consideration of the SHA/budget situation • Revisit multi-year agreements • Objectives agreed with group • Reporting to Lyn Edmonds and Rachel Cooke, Acting SHA Lead for Libraries & Knowledge Management at East of England  • Timing critical

  16. Negotiation approach • 30 November – publishers contacted • Consistent approach • Consider usage with negotiations in context of it being the third year of agreements • Licence the same content • Decision with SHA / EoE journals project group

  17. Reporting • Current status with each publisher • Compare 2009 price in publisher currency with 2010 price offered – show % increase • Show VAT separately • Cost avoidance • Show all prices in a common currency £ using prevailing exchange rate

  18. Benchmarks used • Publishers’ standard price increases • Swets Serials Price Index 2010 • Average cost per download • What would it have cost on pay per view? • Average cost per title per library • How does usage relate to share of budget? • Willingness to use the NHS Model Licence (adapted)

  19. NHS EoE Model Licence Willingness to use licence as basis of the agreement

  20. Were objectives achieved? • More content • Equitable access • Point-of-need access • Better value for money

  21. Lessons learned? • Valuable experience for Librarians • Learnt from colleagues at Content Complete • Need more favourable funding models • Uncertainty • Not optimistic

  22. What next? • Continue monitoring • Continue marketing and publicity • Work with Project Board • Work with other SHAs • Start our bid for 2011

  23. Questions or comments?

  24. Thank you for listening • Lyn Edmonds: Lyn.Edmonds@papworth.nhs.uk • Carolyn Alderson: C.alderson@jisc.ac.uk

More Related