1 / 14

Effectiveness of BWC’s SafetyGrant $ Program

Effectiveness of BWC’s SafetyGrant $ Program. July 1999 – June 2003 results. No claim required to complete an application until November 2001 Employers reported OSHA recordable information, turnover, and risk factor scores Ergonomic interventions only

amie
Télécharger la présentation

Effectiveness of BWC’s SafetyGrant $ Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effectiveness of BWC’sSafetyGrant$ Program

  2. July 1999 – June 2003 results • No claim required to complete an application until November 2001 • Employers reported OSHA recordable information, turnover, and risk factor scores • Ergonomic interventions only • Baseline data: one year for early recipients; two years for later recipients • Follow-up data: two years

  3. Effect of SafetyGrant$ interventions on risk factor scores N = 892 applications 41-percent improvement Time period:July 1999 – June 2003

  4. Effect of SafetyGrant$ interventions on CTD incidence rate N = 892 applications, Standardized per 100 full-time employees 14-percent improvement Time period:July 1999 – June 2003

  5. Effect of SafetyGrant$ interventions on lost days due to CTDs N = 892 applications, Standardized per 100 full-time employees 56-percent improvement Time period:July 1999 – June 2003

  6. Effect of SafetyGrant$ interventions on restricted days due to CTDs N = 892 applications, Standardized per 100 full-time employees 42-percent improvement Time period:July 1999 – June 2003

  7. Effect of SafetyGrant$ interventions on turnover N = 892 applications, Standardized per 100 full-time employees 62 percent of companies improved in turnover or stayed at 0 percent Time period:July 1999 – June 2003

  8. Cost benefit information (injury prevention) July 1999 – June 2003 • $37,012,176 was spent on the interventions (including the employer contribution). • The average amount spent was $41,493. • The most spent was $565,000. The least spent was $530. • 3,374 OSHA recordable injuries per year occurred in the baseline period (average 422 days baseline period). • 2,170 OSHA recordable injuries per year occurred in the follow-up period (two years) • Average workers’ comp claim cost for year 1999 = $10,610 (National Safety Council)

  9. Cost benefit calculation (injury prevention) • ROI (years) = $ spent / [average claim cost X (# claims in baseline per year - # claims in follow-up per year • ROI (years) = $ 37,012,176 / [$10,610 X [(3,901(365/409) – 4,340(365/730)] • ROI (years) = $37,012,176 / $13,913,238 per year • ROI = 2.7 years

  10. July 2003 – April 2009 results • A workers’ compensation claim was required to complete an application. • All types of safety interventions (no longer exclusively for ergonomics) • Baseline data: two years • Follow-up data: 584 days average • Some of the companies have not completed the program • Employers are required to report workers’ compensation claims related to the intervention. • Those employers that have not yet reported any follow-up data are not included in the results. • Data is from 419 applications reported through April 20, 2009.

  11. Effect of SafetyGrant$ interventions on incidence rate N = 419 applications Adjusted per 200,000 hours 56-percent improvement Time period:July 2003 – April 2009

  12. Cost benefit information (injury prevention) July 2003 – April 2009 • $16,460,656 was spent on the interventions (including the employer contribution). • The average amount spent was $39,285. • The most spent was $228,923. The least spent was $509. • 996 claims per year occurred in the baseline period (two-year reporting). • 451 claims per year occurred in the follow-up period (with the average reporting being 584 days).

  13. Cost benefit information (injury prevention) July 2003 – April 2009 • The medical costs for the two-year period before the intervention was $8,239,891. • The indemnity costs for the two-year period before the intervention was $6,283,845. • The total claims costs for the two-year period before the intervention was $14,523,736. • The medical costs for the 584-day follow-up period after the intervention was $1,551,875. • The indemnity costs for the 584-day follow-up period after the intervention was $878,938. • The total claims costs for the 584-day follow-up period after the intervention was $2,430,813.

  14. Cost benefit calculation (injury prevention) • ROI (years) = $ spent / (claims cost in baseline per year – claims cost in follow-up per year) • ROI (years) = $16,460,656 / [$14,523,736(365 days per year/730 reporting days) - $2,430,813(365 days per year/584 reporting days)] • ROI (years) = $16,460,656 / $ 5,742,609 per year • ROI = 2.9 years* * Does not include any future claims costs, so ROI should improve some over time

More Related