1 / 10

Workgroup #98 Address Accuracy Address Quality tools Move Update

Workgroup #98 Address Accuracy Address Quality tools Move Update.

amory
Télécharger la présentation

Workgroup #98 Address Accuracy Address Quality tools Move Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workgroup #98Address AccuracyAddress Quality toolsMove Update

  2. MTAC Work Group #98Address Quality ToolsSponsors:Industry: Jim Schemmel, Joe LubenowUSPS: Charles Bravo, Nick BarrancaWork Group Leaders:Industry: Carole Morrow, BMG Columbia HouseUSPS: Ruth Jones, Charles Hunt

  3. Summary of Activities:Steering Committee met on July 19, 2005Workgroup Meetings: September 21, 2005 – Determine Barriers November 3, 2005 - Refine and Prioritize February 3, 2006 – Agree on Sunset

  4. MTAC Work Group #98 Overarching Issues • Manual Return Volumes on ACS mailings • ACS Returns to Rental List Owner • Expense of “weighted fee” Manual Returns

  5. MTAC Work Group #98 Area of Focus – Address Accuracy Evaluate how the Address Change Service (ACS) can be made more useful for Standard Mail Identify Potential New “Electronic Only” ACS Options

  6. MTAC Work Group #98 Proposed Policy/Procedural Changes • One Code ACS will be a viable solution for all mailers in the near future • Eliminate the cost for hard copy returns for mailers participating: • in One Code ACS • Electronic Only endorsement • Revisit the weighted Fee - Does it still make sense? • Un-bundle the weighted Fee - Forwarding vs UAA

  7. MTAC Work Group #98 Proposed Policy/Procedural Changes Contd • Reduce the number of UAA reasons as recommended by the MITF • Provide incentives for electronic use of ACS – Certified Mailing List

  8. MTAC Work Group #98 Additionally: • Promote ACS as a viable Move Update solution to Standard Mailers, Banking and Financial institutions • Prepare a presentation to DMA List Leaders • Propose a follow up workgroup within the PARS and One – Code environment

  9. MTAC Work Group #98 Desired Result A list of proposed changes designed to eliminate the negative effects of manual returns that are believed to be limiting the use of ACS as a Standard Mail AQ tool. Sunset - – March 31, 2006

  10. Thank You

More Related