80 likes | 226 Vues
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map?. screen resolution (96 dpi). harder to underline and write notes on a screen. portability. familiarity. paper has weight, texture, and feel. Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map?. computers require constant updates.
E N D
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map? screen resolution (96 dpi) harder to underline and write notes on a screen portability familiarity paper has weight, texture, and feel
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map? computers require constant updates screen resolution (96 dpi) computers require Comp skills familiarity harder to underline and write notes on a screen paper has weight, texture, and feel portability with paper, easier to multi-task
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map? computer to communicate, paper to study easy to underline and write notes on paper with paper, easier to multi-task paper more portable easier to make good-looking slides and copies about drafts with computer working options/possiblities and requirements computer to store, paper to read several paperpages simultanosly viewed and compared paper has weight, texture, and feel computers require Comp skills paper has better contrast manual dexterity of child and adult computers require constant updates feelings/perceptions familiarity screen resolution (96 dpi) comp screen is smaller than paper appearance
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map? familiarity feeling paper has weight, texture, and feel computers require constant updates computers require Comp skills commonication with short messages despite of distance circumstances easy to underline and write notes on paper portability with paper, easier to multi-task working options several paper pages simultanosly viewed and compared easier to make good-looking slides and copies about drafts with computer What is smart copy? would that seem better? screen resolution (96 dpi) paper has better contrast computer to store, paper to read comp screen is smaller than paper appearance
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map? manual dexterity of child and adult computers require constant updates computers require Comp skills circumstances easy to underline and write notes on paper portability communication with short messages despite the distance with paper, easier to multi-task working options several paperpages simultanosly viewed and compared easier to make good-looking slides and copies about drafts with computer comp screen is smaller than paper computer to store, paper to read appearance screen resolution (96 dpi) paper has better contrast feelings/perceptions paper has weight, texture, and feel familiarity
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map? manual dexterity of child and adult computers require constant updates computers require Comp skills I am unclear on this one circumstances easy to underline and write notes on paper paper more portable communication with short messages despite the distance with paper, easier to multi-task working options several paperpages simultanosly viewed and compared easier to make good-looking slides and copies about drafts with computer comp screen is smaller than paper computer to store, paper to read appearance screen resolution (96 dpi) paper has better contrast feelings/perceptions familiarity paper has weight, texture, and feel
Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map? computer to communicate, paper to study easy to underline and write notes on paper paper more portable computer to store, paper to read with paper, easier to multi-task easier to make good-looking slides and copies about drafts with computer several paper pages simultanosly viewed and compared working options/possiblities and requirements comp screen is smaller than paper appearance Computer screens Poor screen resolution (96 dpi) computers require paper has better contrast computers require constant updates manual dexterity of child and adult feelings/perceptions computers skills paper has weight, texture, and feel familiarity Group: Tanja, Henna & Roy
Group: • Tanja Lamminmäki-Kärkkäinen, email: tanja.lamminmaki-karkkainen@oulu.fi • Henna Ijäs, email: henna.ijas@tyrnava.fi • Roy Clariana, email: RClariana@psu.edu Rules • Ok to add or modify 5 to 7 components (terms, links, etc.) • Ok to sort item • Not ok to delete without asking first (add an annotation to the component asking the originator to delete it.