1 / 19

Cost Effectiveness

Cost Effectiveness. Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D. Viersprong Institute for studies on Personality Disorders VISPD Jan.Busschbach@deviersprong.nl Erasmus MC Institute for Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy. (Health) Economics. Comparing different allocations

andrew
Télécharger la présentation

Cost Effectiveness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cost Effectiveness • Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D. • Viersprong Institute for studies on Personality Disorders VISPD • Jan.Busschbach@deviersprong.nl • Erasmus MC • Institute for Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy

  2. (Health) Economics • Comparing different allocations • In health care: Should we spent our money on • Wheel chairs • Screening for cancer • Intervention in youth • Jail • Cure • Prevention

  3. Assumptions • Agreement on the budget • Assumption of scarcity • Agreement on outcome • What are the intended effects • Possible to moves between budgets

  4. Economics in policy • Economics in policy are often • Only Better effects for the same (or less) money • “Doelmatigheid” • Efficiency improvement • Budget impact

  5. Car economics • Should we spend our money on a • Suzuki Alto 1.0 • BMW 316

  6. Car economics • Cost effectiveness • Comparing costs • Comparing outcome • Relate costs to outcome • Cost per outcome • Cost per kilometer

  7. League Table

  8. Assumptions • Agreement on the budget • Assumption of scarcity • Possible to moves between budgets • We can buy a Suzkie or a BMW • Agreement on outcome • What are the intended effects • The effects is restricted to ‘movement’

  9. Which costs included in CE youth intervention? • Costs of intervention • Costs of alternatives • Jail • Other treatment • Costs of crime • Material costs • Cost of law enforcement • Other savings • Broken education • Intangible costs

  10. Intangible costs • What are the costs of • Death • Suffering • Rape • Fear • No clear methodology • Willingness to pay

  11. Which outcomes in youth interventions? • What is the aim of youth interventions? • Costs per avoided crime • Costs per contact • Prevention

  12. Effects expressed as costs • Cost Benefit analysis • Effects can now be subtracted from costs

  13. Drivers in health economics • The effect of the intervention • The cost of the intervention • Intangible costs • Discounting

  14. Changes of economics in youth interventions • The effect of the intervention • The cost of the intervention • Alternative is expensive: Jail • Intangible costs • The effects are warranted • Broken education • Discounting • Sometime immediate effects

  15. Threats of economics in youth interventions • The effect of the intervention • Low quality evidence on the effectiveness • A randomized trials is now the standard • The cost of the intervention • Expensive labour-intensive • Intangible costs • No consensus about these costs • Discounting • Often effect are in the further: prevention

  16. Examples • The Washington State Institute for Public Policy • Steve Aos, 2004 • Taxpayer perspective: cost benefit analysis • Intangible costs used as effects (sexual abuse = $ 94,506) • The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth • Cohen, 1998 • Intangible costs: lifetime costs criminal career

  17. Little studies • Welsh & Farrington, 2000 • “[…] little is known about the economic efficiency of correctional intervention strategies. A review of the literature revealed only seven published studies that have presented information on monetary costs and benefits”. • Swaray et al, 2005 • Found only 10 studies • The norm ‘evidence based’ is not near • Research dominated by aetiology and epidemiology

  18. Encouraging results • Reviews show favorable results • Cure is more cost effective than prevention • Targeted prevention works better • Cure more cost effective than incarceration • No Dutch evidence • Although The Netherlands is leading in health economics

  19. Conclusion • Economics are lacking • Main obstacles • Convincible effect studies • The odds are favorable

More Related