1 / 8

Presenters: Bill Speirs – President Terry Martinuk – Director Bob Mackenzie - Director

STAC Recommendations to CSA NI 54-101 Committee. Presenters: Bill Speirs – President Terry Martinuk – Director Bob Mackenzie - Director. January 24, 2008. NI 54-101 Objective: Reasonable Cost. Issue: Mandatory receipt of complete non-objecting beneficial owner (NOBO) files Challenges:

andrew
Télécharger la présentation

Presenters: Bill Speirs – President Terry Martinuk – Director Bob Mackenzie - Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STAC Recommendations to CSA NI 54-101 Committee Presenters: Bill Speirs – President Terry Martinuk – Director Bob Mackenzie - Director January 24, 2008

  2. NI 54-101 Objective: Reasonable Cost • Issue: • Mandatory receipt of complete non-objecting beneficial owner (NOBO) files • Challenges: • Average NOBO file: • 50% want all material • 40% want special meeting material • 10% do not want any material • Impact: • 100% average increase in data costs for annual general meetings (AGMs) • Solution: • Require intermediaries to supply data as per search request • Benefits: • Immediate reduction in file cost • Purchase of non-material data no longer required • Enhanced flexibility as issuers can select data as required • Possibility of Broadridge being able to reduce suppression fees • Reduced fees for non-useful information and move towards reasonable costs

  3. NI 54-101 Objective: Equitable treatment for all shareholders • Issue: • Legal proxy • Challenges: • Complex process • Not fully understood by beneficial owners • Unduly lengthy process • Legal proxies usually received after proxy cut-off – or not at all • Impact: • Makes it difficult for shareholders to vote their shares • Solution: • Eliminate the legal proxy concept • Benefits: • Existing proxy appointee process is more efficient and provides identical rights to legal proxy • Proxy appointee process mirrors process for registered shareholders and is more equitable • Decreases chance of disenfranchisement due to logistics of paper movement for OBOs and NOBOs

  4. NI 54-101 Objective: Reasonable cost and efficiency • Issue: • Voting Instruction Form (VIF) • Challenges • Multiple forms • Lack of clarity of voting process • Complex process for shareholders who want to attend and vote at AGMs • Impact: • Increased cost • Does not meet the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance (CCGG) goals • Disenfranchisement at AGM • Solution: • Implement use of Omnibus Legal Proxy • Benefits: • Reduction in costs • Enhanced clarity – easier to read, understand and tabulate • Improved opportunity for issuer branding • Enables NOBOs to effectively become proxy holders with the same status and rights as registered holders • Standard process for large groups of beneficial and registered holders • More efficient and timely process

  5. NI 54-101 Objective: Reasonable cost and efficiency • Issue: • Increased objecting beneficial owner (OBO) delivery charges by Broadridge of issuer mailings directed to non-objecting beneficial owners (NOBOs) • Challenge: • 25% increase in cost per OBO to about $1.25 • Impact: • Discourages issuers from mailing directly to NOBOs • Material waste if Broadridge refuses to mail to OBOs • Increase in number of issuers who refuse to pay for delivery to OBOs • In 2007, about 800 issuers refused to pay for delivery to OBOs • Disenfranchisement of a group of holders • Irritation and dissatisfaction among issuers over Broadridge pricing • Solution: • Beneficial holder data should be available to all service providers at the same cost regardless of issuer elections • Benefits: • Increased delivery to OBOs • Additional retail voting • More efficient marketplace and reasonable costs

  6. NI 54-101 Objective: Reasonable cost • Issue: • Lack of control over Broadridge fees • Challenge: • 81% average increase in Broadridge fees since 2004 • Impact: • Issuers feel forced to use Broadridge to control costs • Rising fees act as a barrier to entry • Makes it uneconomical for some providers to invest in the necessary technology • Solution: • Introduce price controls or make data available to all issuers and their service providers at the same rate • Look to other jurisdictions for comparable rates • Benefits: • Enhanced control over fees and more reasonable costs • Improved marketplace efficiency through the addition of new vendors • Faster delivery times

  7. NI 54-101 Objective: Efficiency and reasonable cost • Issue: • NI 54-101 provides for the use of an Abridge Time feature to reduce effort and costs of two search processes • Challenge: • A "special handling" charge is applied by Broadridge to those issuers who choose to use the abridging feature • Impact: • Small issuers – who could use abridging to reduce costs – often do not use this feature as result of the "special handling" charge • Dissatisfaction with the process • Higher costs for small issuers • Solution: • Ensure issuers who are able to comply with the abridging requirements are not financially penalized for doing so • Benefits: • Reduced costs • Improved efficiency as only one search is required

  8. NI 54-101 Broadridge Price Increases: 2002 - 2006 Percentage price increase Number of beneficial holders for each issuer

More Related