1 / 39

Q C D : The Theory of the Strong Interaction

Ted Barnes Physics Div. ORNL+UT (+DOE). Q C D : The Theory of the Strong Interaction. Q C D = quantum chromodynamics , ca. 1973 Theory of the strong interaction, including “nuclear ” forces. It’s due to the exchange of spin-1 particles “ gluons ” g between spin-1/2 matter

anevay
Télécharger la présentation

Q C D : The Theory of the Strong Interaction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ted Barnes Physics Div. ORNL+UT (+DOE) QCD: The Theory of the Strong Interaction QCD= quantum chromodynamics, ca. 1973 Theory of the strong interaction, including “nuclear” forces. It’s due to the exchange of spin-1 particles “gluons”gbetween spin-1/2 matter particles,“quarks”qandantiquarksq. Similar toQED (quantum electrodynamics), spin-1photons gare exchanged between spin-1/2electrons e- andpositrons e+. The basic rules of interaction “Feynman vertices” in this “non-Abelian quantum field theory” are that quarks and antiquarks can emit/absorb gluons, and [novel]gluons interact with gluons.

  2. basic physics of QCD Small qq separation Large qq separation

  3. Comparing QED and QCD. (lagrangians) “It’s déjà vu all over again.” -Y.Berra

  4. LGT simulation showing the QCD flux tube Q Q R = 1.2 [fm] “funnel-shaped” VQQ(R) Coul. (OGE) linear conft. (str. tens. = 16 T) The QCD flux tube (LGT, G.Bali et al; hep-ph/010032)

  5. g2, g3,… qqg, q3g,… q2q2, q4q,… glueballs hybrids multiquarks maybe 1 e.g. maybe 1-3 e.g.s “Naïve” physically allowed hadrons (color singlets) _ Conventional quark model mesons and baryons. qq q3 100s of e.g.s “exotica” :

  6. Quarks Minimal solution for quarks needed to explain the known light hadrons: (1964, Gell-Mann, Zweig; Ne’eman): All JP = ½ + (fermions) u Q = +2/3 e (u,d very similar in mass) d Q = -1/3 e s Q = -1/3 e (somewhat heavier) Thus p = uud, n = udd, D++ = uuu, L = uds, p+ = ud, K+ = us, etc.

  7. qqq baryons The lightest qqq baryon octet. (SU(3) symmetry.) 3 x 3 x 3 = 10 + 8 + 8 + 1

  8. qq meson The lightest qq meson octet. (SU(3) symmetry.) 3 x 3 = 8 + 1

  9. The six types or “flavors” of quarks : Gens. I,II,III. LabelNameQ/|e| IIzca.“mass” habitat . u up +2/3 ½ +½ 5 MeV p(938)=uud, n(940)=udd,… d down -1/3 ½ -½ 10 MeV p+(135)=udp-(135)=du,… s strange -1/3 0 (etc) 150 MeV strange hadrons; L=uds,K+=us,… c charm +2/3 1500 MeV y family (cc); opencharm hadrons; Do =cu, D+=cd; Ds+=csLc+=udc, … b bottom -1/3 5 GeV Ufamily (bb); open b hadrons t top +2/3 175 GeV t decays too quickly to hadronize

  10. qq mesonsstates First, some conventional hadrons (qq mesons) to illustrate forces. The quark model treats conventional mesons as qq bound states. Since each quark has spin-1/2, the total spin is Sqq tot = ½ x ½ = 1 + 0 Combining this with orbital angular momentum Lqqgives states of total Jqq = Lqqspin singlets Jqq = Lqq+1, Lqq, Lqq-1spin triplets

  11. qq mesonsquantum numbers ParityPqq = (-1)(L+1) C-parity Cqq = (-1)(L+S) The resulting qq NL states N2S+1LJ have JPC= 1S: 3S11-- ; 1S00 -+ 2S: 23S11-- ; 21S00 -+ … 1P: 3P22+ + ; 3P11+ + ; 3P00+ + ; 1P11+-2P … 1D: 3D33- - ; 3D22- - ; 3D11- - ; 1D22-+2D … JPC forbidden to qq are called “JPC-exotic quantum numbers” : 0- - ; 0+ - ; 1- + ; 2+ - ; 3- + … Plausible JPC-exotic candidates = hybrids, glueballs (high mass), maybe multiquarks (fall-apart decays).

  12. How to make new hadrons (strongly int. particles): Hit things together. A + B -> final state You may see evidence for a new resonance in the decay products. J/y and other 1-- cc Some reactions are “clean”, like e+e- -> hadrons. e.g.s SLAC, DESY 1970s Now: CLEO-c, BES cc B-factories bb (SLAC, KEK) W,Z machines (LEP@CERN)

  13. Charmonium (cc) • A nice example of a QQ spectrum. • Expt. states (blue) are shown with the usual L classification. Above 3.73 GeV: Open charm strong decays (DD, DD* …): broader states except 1D2 2- +, 2- - 3.73 GeV Below 3.73 GeV: Annihilation and EM decays. (rp, KK* , gcc, gg, l+l-..): narrow states.

  14. Fitted and predicted cc spectrum Coulomb (OGE) + linear scalar conft. potential model blue = expt, red = theory. L*S OGE – L*S conft, T OGE as = 0.5538 b = 0.1422 [GeV2] mc = 1.4834 [GeV] s = 1.0222 [GeV] S*S OGE

  15. What about LGT??? An e.g.: X.Liao and T.Manke, hep-lat/0210030 (quenched – no decay loops) Broadly consistent with the cc potential model. cc from LGT <-1- + exotic cc-H at 4.4 GeV Small L=2 hfs.

  16. Sector of the 1st shocking new discovery: cs S P

  17. LGT 0+: 2.44 - 2.47 GeV. S P

  18. Where it all started. BABAR: D*sJ(2317)+ in Ds+p0 D.Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.), PRL90, 242001 (2003). M = 2317 MeV (2 Ds channels), G < 9 MeV (expt. resolution) “Who ordered that !?” - I.I.Rabi (about the m-) Since confirmed by CLEO, Belle and FOCUS. (Theorists expected L=1 cs states, e.g. JP=0+, but with a LARGE width and at a much higher mass.) …

  19. And another! CLEO: D*sJ(2463)+ in Ds*+p0 D.Besson et al. (CLEO Collab.), PRD68, 032002 (2003). M = 2463 MeV, G < 7 MeV (expt. resolution) Since confirmed by BABAR and Belle. M = 2457 MeV. A JP=1+partner of the possibly 0+ D*sJ(2317)+cs ?

  20. (Godfrey and Isgur potential model.) Prev. (narrow) expt. states in gray. DK threshold

  21. Theorists’ responses to the BaBar states Approx. 100 theoretical papers have been published since the discovery. There are two general schools of thought: 1) They are cs quark model mesons, albeit at a much lower mass than expected by the usual NRQPMs. [Fermilab] 2) They are “multiquark” states. (DK molecules) [UT,Oxon,Weiz.] 3) They are somewhere between 1) and 2). [reality]

  22. 2. They are multiquark states (DK molecules)[UT,Oxon,Weiz.] T.Barnes, F.E.Close, H.J.Lipkin, hep-ph/0305025, PRD68, 054006 (2003). 3. reality Recall Weinstein and Isgur’s “KKbar molecules”.

  23. X(3872) Another recent shock to the system: BelleCollab. K.Abe et al, hep-ex/0308029; S.-K.Choi et al, hep-ex/0309032, PRL91 (2003) 262001. B+ / - -> K+ / -p+p-J /Y (From e+e- collisions at KEK.) cc sector y(3770) = 3D1 cc. If the X(3872)is 1D cc, an L-multiplet is split much more than expected assuming scalar conft. G < 2.3MeV M = 3872.0 +- 0.6 +- 0.5 MeV

  24. Fitted and predicted cc spectrum Coulomb (OGE) + linear scalar conft. potential model blue = expt, red = theory. X(3872) not cc ???

  25. CDF II Collab. D.Acosta et al, hep-ex/0312021, PRL to appear X(3872) confirmation (from Fermilab) G.Bauer, QWG presentation, 20 Sept. 2003. n.b. most recent CDF II: M = 3871.3 pm 0.7 pm 0.4 MeV X(3872) also confirmed by D0Collab. at Fermilab. Perhaps also seen by BaBar OK, it’s real…

  26. M = 3872.0 +- 0.6 +- 0.5 MeV Accidental agreement? If not cc 2- + or 2- - or …, a molecular (DD*) state? M( Do + D*o) = 3871.5 +- 0.5 MeV X(3872) n.b. M( D+ + D*-) = 3879.5 +- 0.7MeV Charm in nuclear physics???

  27. Glueballs: Theor. masses (LGT) The glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study Colin Morningstar, Mike Peardon Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 034509 The spectrum of glueballs below 4 GeV in the SU(3) pure-gauge theory is investigated using Monte Carlo simulations of gluons on several anisotropic lattices with spatial grid separations ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 fm.

  28. How to make new hadrons (strongly int. particles) (II): Hit more things together. A + B -> final state You may see evidence for a new resonance in the decay products. Reactions between hadrons (traditional approach) are “rich” but usually poorly understood. All light-q and g mesons, incl. qq, glueballs, hybrids, multiquarks. e.g.s BNL p-p -> mesons + baryon LEAR (CERN) pp annih.

  29. Glueball discovery? Crystal Barrel expt. (LEAR@CERN, ca. 1995) pp-> p0 p0p0 Evidence for a scalar resonance, f0(1500)-> p0 p0 n.b. Some prefer a different scalar, f0(1710) -> hh, KK. PROBLEM: Neither f0 decays in a naïve glueball flavor-symmetric way to pp, hh, KK. qq <-> G mixing?

  30. Hybrid meson?JPC = 1-+ exotic. (Can’t be qq.) E852@BNL, ca. 1996 p-p -> (p-h’) p (Current best of several reactions and claimed exotics.) p1(1600) Follow up expts planned at a new meson facility at CEBAF; “HallD” or GlueX. a2(1320) qq exotic

  31. (Too?) exciting news: the pentaquark at CLAS (CEBAF). nK+ = (udd)(us) = u2d2s. Can’t be a 3 quark baryon! A “flavor exotic” multiquark (if it exists). ( > 200 papers)

  32. The multiquark fiasco “These are very serious charges you’re making, and all the more painful to us, your elders, because we still have nightmares from five times before.” -village elder, “Young Frankenstein”

  33. Upper Limit on the Q+ Yield (p) Q+(1540) ? • the nK+ mass spectrum is smooth • no structure is observed at a mass of ~1540 MeV Counts/4 MeV Counts/4 MeV -0.8 < cosqCM < -0.6 preliminary M(nK+)(GeV) Counts/4 MeV 0.6 < cosqCM < 0.8 M(nK+)(GeV) M(nK+)(GeV)

  34. The dangerous 1970s multiquark logic: (which led to the multiquark fiasco) The known hadron resonances, qq and qqq (and qqq) exist because they are color singlets. Therefore all higher Fock space “multiquark” color singlet sectors will also possess hadron resonances. q2q2 “baryonia” q6 “dibaryons” q4q “Z*” for q = s … now “pentaquarks” MANY theoretical predictions of avery rich spectrumof multiquark resonances followed in the 1970s/early 1980s. (Bag model, potential models, QCD_SRs, color chemistry,…)

  35. The simplest e.g. of had-had scat: I=2pp. (A flavor-exotic 27 channel, no s-channel qq resonances, so no qq annihilation. Similar to the NN and BB’ problems.) Q = +2 channel No qq states. u2d2? I=2 pp S-wave d 0I=2[deg] No I=2 q2q2 resonance at 1.2 GeV. (Bag model prediction, would give Dd = + 180 [deg] there.) Expt sees only repulsive ppscat. Mpp [GeV]

  36. Why are there no multiquark resonances? “Fall-Apart Decay” (actually not a decay at all: no HI ) Most multiquark models found that most channels showed short distance repulsion: E(cluster) > M1 + M2. Thus no bound states. Only 1+2 repulsive scattering. Exceptions: 2) E(cluster) < M1 + M2, bag model: u2d2s2 H-dibaryon, MH - MLL = - 80 MeV. n.b. LLhypernuclei exist, so this H was wrong. 1) nuclei and hypernuclei weak int-R attraction allows “molecules” “VLL(R)” VNN(R) -2mN -2mL 3) Heavy-light R R Q2q2 (Q=b, c?)

  37. (q2q2),(q4q),… (q3)n, (qq)(qq),(qq)(q3),… multiquark clusters ??? nuclei / molecules controversial e.g.the ex-pentaquarkQ(1542) ca. 106 e.g.s of (q3)n, maybe 1-3 others g2, g3,… qqg, q3g,… q2q2, q4q,… glueballs hybrids multiquarks maybe 1 e.g. maybe 1-3 e.g.s Post-fiasco physically allowed hadrons (color singlets) “Naïve” physically allowed hadrons (color singlets) _ Conventional quark model mesons and baryons. qq q3 100s of e.g.s Basis state mixing may be very important in some sectors. ”exotica” :

  38. Summary and conclusions: The strong interaction is described by QCD, a gauge theory of quarks and gluons, which possesses the remarkable property of “confinement”. This implies that a rich spectrum of qq mesons, qqq baryons, glueballs and hybrids, and possibly multiquarks, should exist and be observable experimentally. This theory should also predict the nuclear forces that underlie NP. Techniques used by theorists to study these states include models (esp. the NR quark model), and most recently lattice QCD. Recent developments are concerned with the possible existence of the “exotica” - glueballs, hybrids and multiquarks, charmed mesons found at much lower masses than expected, and an assortment of charmed quark hadrons, esp. cc “charmonia”. Derivation of nuclear forces (e.g. NN) from QCD is an interesting, open topic.

More Related