1 / 5

Clinical Research Methodology Course “Databases and Registries in Rheumatology:

Clinical Research Methodology Course “Databases and Registries in Rheumatology: Complementing Randomized Clinical Trials” Friday, December 15, 2006 NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Loeb Auditorium 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003. Why?. RCT What is it good for?

angus
Télécharger la présentation

Clinical Research Methodology Course “Databases and Registries in Rheumatology:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clinical Research Methodology Course “Databases and Registries in Rheumatology: Complementing Randomized Clinical Trials” Friday, December 15, 2006 NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Loeb Auditorium 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003

  2. Why? • RCT • What is it good for? • What are its shortcomings? • Databases and registries • What kind of information • Which patients? • How to collect the information • How to use the information

  3. Why? • What kind of tools do we have? • How can the tools we have help us make treatment decisions? • How can all this be applied to everyday, routine care of arthritis patients?

  4. Enduring materials • Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases – special issue • Podcast • Please hold questions until the end of the talk • Centocor & Genentech

  5. “We become confident in our educated guesswork to the point where it is easy to confuse personal opinion with evidence, or personal ignorance with scientific uncertainty” David Naylor

More Related