1 / 7

Major Ethics Case Studies

Major Ethics Case Studies. Focus on the major technological disasters and catastrophes in engineering. Module 4 in the “Teaching Engineering Ethics” Series. Outline of Material. Major Ethical Impact = Macro-ethics Micro-ethics (the individual and the situation) Macro-ethics (systemic issues)

anila
Télécharger la présentation

Major Ethics Case Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Major Ethics Case Studies Focus on the major technological disasters and catastrophes in engineering Module 4 in the “Teaching Engineering Ethics” Series

  2. Outline of Material • Major Ethical Impact = Macro-ethics • Micro-ethics (the individual and the situation) • Macro-ethics (systemic issues) • Ethics as a “Design Problem” • Engineer as a Moral Agent • Analogies: Design and Ethics Decisions • Case: The Space Shuttle Challenger

  3. Macro-Ethical Issues • Safety, Loss of Life, Catastrophic Failures • Typically Newsworthy Items • The Space Shuttle Challenger* • Bhopal—Union Carbide* • The Ford Pinto • Firestone and Ford Explorer tires • Three Mile Island / Chernobyl Nuclear Reactors • Kansas City Hyatt Suspended Walkway • Boston Molasses Tank Accident* • Indicative of systemic problems (beyond simple engineering and day-to-day ethics)

  4. Ethics as a Design Problem • The engineer as a moral agent • Moral problems • …are practical problems (they demand a response) • …are not multiple-choice problems • Design Process • Recognize and Evaluate the Problem • Devise solutions • Evaluate solutions • Choose from the alternatives • The “devise solutions” phase is typically shortchanged in the ethics judgment process or artificially constrained to a limited set of alternatives

  5. Ethics as a Design Problem • How ethics “sound bites” oversimplify the ethical reasoning process: • “Do the right thing” • Portrays the problem as having an exclusive solution set • “Should [the agent] do X or Y” • Portrays the problem as a binary multiple-choice solution set with no latitude for creating alternatives • Exploits a limited “win-lose” or “lose-win” paradigm • “There are no right or wrong answers” • Indicative of a “moral relativism” philosophy or simply that there is no uniquely correct solution • In reality, there can be solutions that are better than others and which can be prioritized • Also, solutions can each comprise a unique and special advantage

  6. Ethics as a Design Problem • What solutions sets exist for a given set of specifications or ethical constraints?

  7. Ethics as a Design Problem • Lessons from design problems: • Consider the Uncertainties in the Situation • Ambiguities often underemphasized in professional ethics • Decisions to be made: • Whether to gather additional evidence • How to address the issues with others • How to elicit support for the moral concern • Determining possible solutions is separate from defining the problem and may require more information • Time Pressure is real and demands searching for multiple alternative solutions in parallel • The ethical situation may be dynamically changing; decisions should not be made on an old “snapshot” of the situation

More Related