1 / 14

WEEK5: POLITICAL RESEARCH

WEEK5: POLITICAL RESEARCH. Office Hours. On Thursdays From 1.30pm to 2.30pm Or e-mail: Baris.Gulmez.2009@live.rhul.ac.uk. Validity vs. Reliability ( Case I). Xenophobia against Pakistani immigrants in the UK? - Are X’s research findings valid? Why?. Validity vs. Reliability ( Case II).

anissag
Télécharger la présentation

WEEK5: POLITICAL RESEARCH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WEEK5: POLITICAL RESEARCH

  2. Office Hours • On Thursdays • From 1.30pm to 2.30pm • Or e-mail: Baris.Gulmez.2009@live.rhul.ac.uk

  3. Validity vs. Reliability (Case I) • Xenophobia against Pakistani immigrants in the UK? • - Are X’s research findings valid? Why?

  4. Validity vs. Reliability (Case II) • American civil servants’ attitudes towards internet censorship. -Are Y’s findings reliable? Why? - Why did Z receive different answers, in your opinion?

  5. CONCEPTUALIZATION AND OPERATIONALIZATION In evaluating information about the social world about any particular topic X, it is helpful to keep 2 questions in mind: 1. "What is meant by X in this research?" (conceptual definition) 2. "How was X measured?" (operational definition)

  6. Case 3: measuring democracy • consider the UK, France, Tunisia, and Iran as democratic. • Do you agree with their measurement of democracy? Would you use additional indicators to measure democracy?

  7. Case 4: political dissatisfaction • the level of political dissatisfaction in the world. • Do you agree with their argument? Why?

  8. Group Work  Your Hypothesis: • Poorer countries are more likely to experience political violence • Select a country(ies) • Suggest different research methods to test whether your hypothesis is true or not. • Explain how your team will conduct the research (how long the research will take, the budget etc…)

  9. Essay Structure (Introduction and Conclusion!) • Proper introduction: define the keywords in the essay question and provides the essay outline. • Be concise  • Proper Conclusion summarizes and highlights your main argument/answer. • Be convincing 

  10. Essay writing • show your knowledge of the academic world: Refer to many academic articles and books! • show your familiarity with world politics: give a lot of real-world examples • Avoid long and ambiguous sentences!

  11. Quality of your essay • A good essay is critical and analytical (rather than descriptive): • questioning, evaluating, making judgements, finding connections and categorising (rather than simply summarizing what you read and heard) • Show that you are aware of the counter-arguments and try to refute them. • Acknowledge the limitations of your own argument.

  12. Referencing • Avoid plagiarism (intellectual theft) • Always give the name of the author, the year of publication, and the number of page. e.g. “Charts and graphs illustrate the results of the research.” (Bogdan and Biklen 1998:4). or According to Bogdan and Biklen (1998:4), “Charts and graphs illustrate the results of the research.”

  13. Bibliography • Article • Levy, J. S. and Thompson, W. R. (2005) ‘Hegemonic Threats and Great-Power Balancing in Europe, 1495-1999’, Security Studies 14 (1): 1-33.

  14. Next Week 

More Related