1 / 9

Political culture and Forest Programmes in Finland

Political culture and Forest Programmes in Finland. Pekka Ol l onqvist & Harri Hänninen Finnish Forest Research Institute. Political culture and Governance in Finland. Elements of Political Culture State and Local Governance Main features of power structures of political arena:

danyl
Télécharger la présentation

Political culture and Forest Programmes in Finland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Political culture and Forest Programmes in Finland Pekka Ollonqvist & Harri Hänninen Finnish Forest Research Institute

  2. Political culture and Governance in Finland • Elements of Political Culture • State and Local Governance • Main features of power structures of political arena: • dominance of president during 1956-1981 • steps to parliamentary democracy during 1982-1991 • adaptation to international communities from 1992- • Forest policy culture through decades

  3. The Concept of Political Culture • Political cultureCase: Parliamentary democracy • Concentration of public and private power and activities on policy arena • Legal base of institutions; extent and coverage • Levels of political arena • Legislative level - President/constitutional monarch - Parliament • Executive level - Government – NGOs • Political culture implement: • how to legitimate social institutions • the set of legitimate actions for: • Public power • NGOs on legislative(lobbying)/executive (corporatist networks) levels • set of candidate actions to modify or revise social institutions • set of candidate agendas to modify or revise social institutions

  4. State governance in Finland • Legislate level • president • common (currently direct) election, • a six-year term, • prior strong status dismantled for parliament • unicameral parliament • common (proportional) election • a four-year term • president can dissolve (for specified reasons) • Executive level • government • multi-party tradition • non-governmental organisations (NGOs) • strong advocacy colitions among labour unions and agriculture

  5. Local governance in Finland • provincial advocacy administration • only executive institutions on state power (parliament election, justice, defence, environment…) • strong municipal self-governance • 450 municipalities • common (proportional) election • access to taxation, educational and health institutions • Multicultural regionsin culture, language, religion and strong minority rights • Identification of citizenship on local and national state level

  6. President substituted Parliament and Government during 1956-81 Forest policy arena Intensive, expanding timber production Legislate level: • Unchanged STM Executive level: • Timber investment programs (MERA I-III, 1963-1975) • integrated part of macroeconomic planning • initiative from forest strong, closednetwork • top-down approach • technocrat planning Political arena Towards Scandinavian welfare state Legislate level: • president and elite dominates Executive level: • Governments • short lived • short run policy targets • freqent parliamentary minority • NGOs • increasing political power • single advocacy for organised interest • Economic Council • major arenaneo-corporatist actions

  7. Towards parliamentary democracy during 1982-92 Political arena Parliamentary state for individuals Legislate level: • new president initiated actions to strenghten parliamentary power Executive level: • Governments • multi- party majority • living parliamentary period • long run policy tragets • NGOs • multiple advocacies for organised interest • strong diversified political powerstrong • Economic Council • neo- corporatist actions extends to market prices and social policy • International dimension • associate contracts to international networks Forest policy arena Intensive, expanding timber production and use Legislate level: • Unchanged STM Executive level: Programsfor timber investments and use • Forest 2000 (1985) • Rev Forest 2000 (1992) • Economic Council initiator • forest network • dominating role • forest science society higly involved • extended representation of interest groups • first ENGO since 1991 • top-down approach

  8. Adaptation to international communities during 1992-2003 Political arena Internationalization & pluralism Legislate level: • strog parliament substitutes president into formal position by new constitution Executive level: • Government • multi-party parliamentary majority • living parliamentary period • detailed long run policy tragets • NGOs • multiple advocacies for organised interest • diversified arenas • pluralist participation • Market allocation • International dimension • restricting agreements & commitments • EU & EMU membership Forest policy arena Increasing timber use parallel with ecological biodiversity preservation Legislate level: • comprehensive revision of legislation for SFM Executive level: • Environmental Programme for Forestry (1994) • Finland’s NFP (1999) • formal status by government • forest network • forest science society in minor role • pluralist participation • many ENGOs involved • new participation channels • bottom-up approach • regional forest programmes

  9. Forest policy culture through decades • Policy initials: government substitute forest networks • Policy preparation: from mono-corporatism to pluralist-corporatism • Policy agenda: • from closed preparation to new channels providing access to participation • from top-down approach towards bottom-up approach • from technocratic planning towards participatory planning • Policy implementation: • from fixed compherensive plans towards iterative policy formulation

More Related