1 / 25

Deformation & damage of lead-free solder joints

Deformation & damage of lead-free solder joints. COST 531 Final Meeting, 17th-18th May 2007, Vienna J. Cugnoni 1 , J. Botsis 1 , V. Sivasubramaniam 2 , J. Janczak-Rusch 2 1 Lab. Applied Mechanics & Reliability, EPFL, Switzerland 2 Füge- und Grenzflächentechnologie, EMPA, Switzerland.

anitra
Télécharger la présentation

Deformation & damage of lead-free solder joints

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deformation & damage of lead-free solder joints COST 531 Final Meeting, 17th-18th May 2007, Vienna J. Cugnoni1, J. Botsis1, V. Sivasubramaniam2, J. Janczak-Rusch2 1 Lab. Applied Mechanics & Reliability, EPFL, Switzerland 2 Füge- und Grenzflächentechnologie, EMPA, Switzerland

  2. Outline • Overview of the project: • Global goals & achievements • Methods & developments: • Experimental techniques • Modelling • Key results • Elasto-plastic characterization of SAC405 • Constraining & size effects • Ductile failure: effect of voids • Future • Bridging the length scales & the disciplines

  3. Nature of Irreversible Deformations Objectives Global Project Interface Micro Structure ConstitutiveEquations Thermo-mechanical History Size / ConstrainingEffects Manufacturing Deformation & damage of lead-free solder joints • Size & constraining effects • Tensile / shear joints • Effect of microstructure: • Effect of porosity content • Failure mechanisms: • Ductile fracture • Studied system: • SAC 405 / Cu substrates ?

  4. Designof Experiments Elasto-plastic characterization of SAC 405 Effects of voids on the reliability of joints Experimental OpticalStrainMeasurement Micro Structure Analysis Constitutive LawType Finite Element Model Modelling Effects of Constraints Investigations on Size Effects Inverse Num. / Exp.Identification Methods & developments: overview

  5. Nature of Irreversible Deformations Global Project Interface Micro Structure ConstitutiveEquations Thermo-mechanical History Size / ConstrainingEffects Manufacturing Key results: overview

  6. Thoughts about the future…. Short term: • Time / temperature dependent properties. • Interfacial failure: cohesive elements Mid-Long term: Bridging the length scales & disciplines Thermodynamics, phase diagrams Meso Solidification /diffusion simulation ? Diffusion, interfaces, solidification, microstructure Micro Homogenization Continuum mechanics, damage, fracture… Macro Need more transversal research !!

  7. 9.5 mm 8 mm 2 mm g 1 mm t 4 mm w L Tensile & shear specimens Tensile specimenL=120 mm, w=20 mm, t=1mm, g=[0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.2, 2.4] mm Solder cross section = 20x1 mm2 Shear specimenL=120mm, joint cross section=2x2 mm2 Optimized for stress uniformity & simple manufacturing thickness=2mm

  8. Digital Image Correlation Why optical strain measurements?? • non-invasive measurements at a small scale DIC algorithms developments: • Tensile joints: • Small strains, small translations • High accuracy is needed • Spatial Correlation with cubic spline resampling • Shear joints: • Extremely large strains, large displacement • Need excellent robustness • Incremental FFT-based correlation Advantages / Drawbacks + Versatile & simple to setup + Robust in most cases - Resolution limited by pixel size - Need a random pattern 4 mm

  9. ESPI measurements (STSM, D. Karalekas) Work done with Dr.Karalekas,Univ. Piraeus, Greece during a STSM at EPFL Advantages: • Sensitivity independant from magnification: excellent for global observations • Full field measurement Drawbacks: • Decorrelation • Problems with creep tests Application: • Evaluate boundary conditions • Full field displacement measurement on assemblies 20 mm

  10. Finite Element modelling Modelling? why?? • Models have the power of generalization of knowledge FE models Advantages: • Versatility: Complex geometries, multi-components, multi-physics • Ability to extrapolate knowledge gained on simple test cases to much more complex designs & geometries !! • Multi-scale modelling (homogenization) Drawback: • Requires an extensive & reliable set of parameters => huge characterization task Combining Experiments & Numerical simulation is of prime importance

  11. Inverse num.-exp. identification In-situ characterization of constitutive parameters Experimental SpecimenProduction TensileTest (DIC) Experimental Load – Displacement / Stress-Strain response Global / local responseof the specimen Geometric &structural effects Identification Loop Optimization (Least Square Fitting) Modelling parameters:Constitutive law, failure model Geometry & BoundaryConditions FEM Simulated Load – Displacement / Stress-Strain response Numerical Simulations

  12. Constraining effects:Tensile & shear solder joints

  13. Rigid substrates: - impose lateral stresses at the interfaces - hydrostatic stresses => apparent hardening => constraining effects Plastic deformation of solder: - constant volume => solder shrinks in lateral directions Solder joint in tension: - stiff elastic substrates - plastic solder (n~=0.5) Constraints in tensile solder joints

  14. Parametric FE study: Results => Constraining effects are due to the the triaxiality (hydrostatic part) of the stress field in the solder induced by the substrate

  15. Parametric FE study: Results Constraining effects are inversely proportionnal to the gap to thickness ratio G in tensile joints

  16. Shear: constraining effects Parametric FE simulation of shear joint response Pure shear = isochoric deformation => no significant effects of constraints !!

  17. Shear: Gap – ultimate stress relationship Shear: No significant effect of solder gap on ultimate stress

  18. Size effects: Tensile & Shear solder joints

  19. Identified elasto-plastic law / size effects Tensile joints Mechanical properties decreasing for smaller joints: combination of scale effects & porosity Manufacturing process is also size dependant

  20. Identified elasto-plastic law / size effects Shear joints Size effect • Tensile / shear joints: • similar elasto-plastic behaviours • - similar size effects (manufacturing?)

  21. Deformation & damage mechanisms in lead-free solder joints

  22. 2.4mm 0.7mm 0.5mm (vacuum) Microstructure & Fractography Microstructure before testing Fractography • Pores: • created during manufacturing and grow with plastic deformation • introduces large scatter in experimental data => model void !! • If porosity cannot be eliminated • => Include it in models as a « random » variable

  23. Evolution of porosity Growth Nucleation Porous metal plasticity: Gurson-Tvergaard model Porosity content is an internal variable of the model: f= density ratio = 1- void_fraction Effect of voids Yield surface Hydrostatic pressure Yield function without pores

  24. Changes in initial porosity % Shear joint response & porous metal plasticity Plastic Yielding Void growth Void nucleation Ult. strain

  25. Ductile failure simulation Void growth Plastic Yielding Void nucleation Ult. strain • Porous metal plasticity model can • Predict the progressive ductile failure of metal up to rupture • Simulate shear band formation & localization • Introducing « random » initial porosity => statistical estimate of the failure strain in a given assembly

More Related