1 / 15

Dalsone Kwarisiima MD, MPH

Outcomes of newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients referred to care after Provider Initiated HIV Counseling and Testing (PITC) in Uganda July 1 st 2013. Dalsone Kwarisiima MD, MPH F Semitala, J Ngabirwe, N Matsiko, S Muhumuza, J Namusobya, C Nawavvu and M R. Kamya

anja
Télécharger la présentation

Dalsone Kwarisiima MD, MPH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outcomes of newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients referred to care after Provider Initiated HIV Counseling and Testing (PITC) in UgandaJuly 1st 2013 Dalsone Kwarisiima MD, MPH F Semitala, J Ngabirwe, N Matsiko, S Muhumuza, J Namusobya, C Nawavvu and M R. Kamya Makerere University Joint AIDS Program

  2. Background • Successful HIV care requires; -early identification of HIV infected individuals -immediate linkage to care - long-term retention on potent ART • Less than 60% are assessed for ART eligibility within 3 months following a positive HIV test1 1Rosen , 2011

  3. Background continued • MJAP has provided PITC in large national referral and teaching hospitals since 2004 • Identified HIV-infected patients are referred to clinics of their choice • Outcome of referrals of newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients is largely unknown

  4. Objectives • Evaluate outcomes of referral of HIV-infected Patients identified through PITC • Evaluate access to CD4 testing and ART among patients linked to care.

  5. Methods • We reviewed PITC registers between Nov 2011 and March 2012 • A total of 19,794 patients received PITC • 2327 were HIV-infected • 867 were randomly selected • We interviewed the selected on phone • For unsuccessful initial phone call, two more attempts were made • We collected data on : • Patient’s vital status • Social demographics • Dates of HIV test and enrollment into HIV care • Reasons for non-linkage • Access to baseline CD4 testing • Access to ART • Used logistic regression to analyze for predictors of linkage

  6. Results • We ascertained outcomes for 70% (620/867) of interviewed • Successfully completed the calls for 81% (500/620) • Majority were females (55%) • Mean age was 31 years (SD,9.4)

  7. Outcomes of phone contacts made n=867

  8. Out comes of referralsN= 500 Linked to care 91%, (454/500) Not linked 9%, (46/500) Median time from diagnosis to linkage was 3 months, (IQR=2 - 5)

  9. Reasons for Non-linkage n=46

  10. Factors associated with Linkage to HIV care

  11. Access to CD4 testing and ART CD4 Testing(n=500) • Had a CD4 done = 441(88%) • Had Not yet had CD4 done = 19(4%) • Not sure if CD4 was done = 40(8%) ART(n=500) • On ART = 275(60%) • Not on ART=181(39%) • Unknown=5(1%)

  12. Limitations • Recall bias • A third of patients could not be reached, so their outcomes could not be ascertained • Our findings on linkage at a large national referral hospital may have limited generalizability.

  13. Conclusion • Majority of the patients successfully tracked were in care • Outcomes a third of newly diagnosed HIV patients was not ascertained • Being single and younger age were predictors of not being in care • Need to design Strategies for active linkage and follow up of identified HIV positive

  14. Acknowledgement • HIV patients who participated • MJAP PITC team • Mulago Hospital Staff • PEPFAR and CDC

More Related