1 / 1

I NTRODUCTION

Emotional Intelligence in a Physician Assistant Student Cohort from Interview through Graduation. Raymond Eifel, MS, PA-C, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, AU & Amanda Welbourne, MSPAS, PA-C, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA. D ISCUSSION

ankti
Télécharger la présentation

I NTRODUCTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emotional Intelligence in a Physician Assistant Student Cohort from Interview through Graduation Raymond Eifel, MS, PA-C, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, AU & Amanda Welbourne, MSPAS, PA-C, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA DISCUSSION Although no correlations between application data and trait-based EI factors were identified, interview EI scores were the highest of those collected. Applicants make multiple investments in the interview process therefore treat it as they would any high-stakes situation. Although there may have been no deliberate attempt by the applicant to deceive; the persona of an applicant may be best at the time of interview. In light of this finding programs may want to reassess the intended outcomes and processes associated with their interview process. The changes associated with the end of didactic year may be attributed to the solitary activities generally associated with developing foundational knowledge. Creating situational didactic experiences may provide a path towards developing a students EI. Finally changes associated with the end of clinical year may be due to the increased interaction a student has with both preceptors and patients. REFERENCES 1. Stern DT. Measuring medical professionalism. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press; 2006. 2. Petrides KV. Psychometric Properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). In: Parker JD, Saklofske DH, Stough C. Eds. Assessing Emotional Intelligence. Springer; 2009: 85-101. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Mari Stoilova for her tireless effort in entering paper survey data for processing and Dr. K. V. Petrides for scoring the collected TEIQue data. Additional information on the TEIQue is available through the London Psychometric Laboratory at http://www.psychometriclab.com. INTRODUCTION Multiple data points are collected on future physician assistants (PA) from the time they begin the application process through their eventual graduation. Although many tangible items (i.e. GPA, GRE results) are available on applicants, few measures for the intangibles exist. Emotional intelligence (EI) may provide one potential gateway towards measuring for these intangibles. Trait-based EI consists of constructs which are compatible with the nature of emotions.1 The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire2 (TEIQue – pronounced TQ) assesses fifteen unique constructs that are grouped into four factors and finally into a single global measure. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was twofold. First, examine for correlations between the applicants application, interview data and trait-based EI factors. Second, to follow the matriculating class for changes in EI during the course of the program. METHODS The TEIQue was administered during time set aside at the student’s interview and at the end of both didactic and clinical years. Students were informed that participation was voluntary and that information gathered would not be used in any admissions or program-related decisions. The questionnaires were coded and identifiers were maintained by a third-party. Surveys were scored by a third-party. Analyses was performed using SPSS v. 20. RESULTS • No significant correlations existed between application information of gender, age, GPA (science or total), GRE, individual or group interview scores and any of the measured EI factors or Global EI at the time of interview. • Four EI factors and Global EI were highest at interview. • A significant difference (p < .05) occurred between interview and the end of didactic year in all measured EI factors and Global EI. • There were no significant differences in any measure between the end of didactic year and the end of clinical year. • The Cronbach's alpha reliability for interview, didactic year, and clinical year surveys were .92, .88, and .87, respectively. 2012 PAEA Educational Forum, Seattle, WA, Poster 1111

More Related